Literature DB >> 10944565

Enrollment of women in cardiovascular clinical trials funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

D J Harris1, P S Douglas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With the recognition that certain aspects of cardiovascular disease are specific to sex, the government has sought to ensure that federally funded clinical research yields adequate high-quality information about heart disease in women.
METHODS: We tabulated the numbers of men and women in cardiovascular clinical trials funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) between 1965 and 1998, recording both total numbers and the numbers for each type of cardiovascular disease. We analyzed the data according to the sex-specific prevalence of disease and assessed changes in enrollment over time. We performed a similar analysis after excluding all single-sex trials.
RESULTS: A total of 398,801 subjects (215,796 women and 183,005 men) were enrolled in NHLBI-funded studies of cardiovascular disease. The overall enrollment rate for women (54 percent) exceeded the prevalence of cardiovascular disease in women in the general population (49 percent) and increased over time (P=0.002). With single-sex trials excluded, the enrollment rate for women was 38 percent, which did not change significantly over time. In studies of coronary artery disease and hypertension the rates of enrollment of women were similar to or exceeded the prevalence of these disorders in women. The enrollment rate increased significantly over time in studies of coronary artery disease (P<0.001) but not in studies of hypertension or arrhythmia. Women were under-enrolled in studies of heart failure, and the rate of enrollment did not change significantly over time. When single-sex trials were excluded from the analysis of enrollment rates according to the prevalence of disease, the results were similar. There was no change in enrollment rates overtime for any category of disease.
CONCLUSIONS: Federal efforts to increase the representation of women in clinical trials have been moderately successful primarily because of the institution of a small number of large, single-sex trials involving coronary artery disease. There has been no change in the sex composition of cohorts in the majority of studies of cardiovascular disease.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10944565     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200008173430706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  56 in total

1.  Evaluating the generalizability of a large streamlined cardiovascular trial: comparing hospitals and patients in the dual antiplatelet therapy study versus the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.

Authors:  Robert W Yeh; Matthew J Czarny; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Dean J Kereiakes; David R Holmes; Ralph G Brindis; W Douglas Weaver; John S Rumsfeld; Matthew T Roe; Sunghee Kim; Priscilla Driscoll-Shempp; Laura Mauri
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2014-11-16

Review 2.  Recent clinical trial highlights in hypertension.

Authors:  F C Luft
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.369

3.  Sex bias in trials and treatment must end.

Authors:  Alison M Kim; Candace M Tingen; Teresa K Woodruff
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Sex/gender differences in cardiovascular disease prevention: what a difference a decade makes.

Authors:  Lori Mosca; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Nanette Kass Wenger
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Gender bias in research: how does it affect evidence based medicine?

Authors:  Anita Holdcroft
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Refusal to participate in heart failure studies: do age and gender matter?

Authors:  Jordan M Harrison; Miyeon Jung; Terry A Lennie; Debra K Moser; Dean G Smith; Sandra B Dunbar; David L Ronis; Todd M Koelling; Bruno Giordani; Penny L Riley; Susan J Pressler
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 3.036

Review 7.  Sex disparities in substance abuse research: Evaluating 23 years of structural neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Kimberly E Lind; Eric J Gutierrez; Dorothy J Yamamoto; Michael F Regner; Sherry A McKee; Jody Tanabe
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 4.492

8.  Gender balance in cardiovascular research: importance to women's health.

Authors:  Anne Hamilton Dougherty
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2011

9.  Beliefs of women's risk as research subjects: a four-city study examining differences by sex and by race/ethnicity.

Authors:  Stefanie L Russell; Ralph V Katz; Nancy R Kressin; B Lee Green; Min Qi Wang; Cristina Claudio; Krassimira Tzvetkova
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.681

10.  Sex-Stratified Trends in Enrollment, Patient Characteristics, Treatment, and Outcomes Among Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients: Insights From Clinical Trials Over 17 Years.

Authors:  Kristian Kragholm; Sharif A Halim; Qinghong Yang; Phillip J Schulte; Judith S Hochman; Chiara Melloni; Kenneth W Mahaffey; David J Moliterno; Robert A Harrington; Harvey D White; Paul W Armstrong; E Magnus Ohman; Frans Van de Werf; Pierluigi Tricoci; John H Alexander; Robert P Giugliano; L Kristin Newby
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2015-07-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.