| Literature DB >> 22806612 |
Lauren M Kunz1, Robert W Yeh, Sharon-Lise T Normand.
Abstract
In this commentary, we argue that although randomization has many benefits, not all questions we seek to answer fit into a randomized setting. Our argument utilizes the clinical setting of carotid atherosclerosis management where specific clinical questions are answered by using a variety of comparative effectiveness designs. Observational studies should not be ruled out when designing studies to address questions of comparative effectiveness.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22806612 PMCID: PMC5048192 DOI: 10.1002/sim.5482
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stat Med ISSN: 0277-6715 Impact factor: 2.373