Literature DB >> 24016489

Embedding a randomized clinical trial into an ongoing registry infrastructure: unique opportunities for efficiency in design of the Study of Access site For Enhancement of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Women (SAFE-PCI for Women).

Connie N Hess1, Sunil V Rao, David F Kong, Laura H Aberle, Kevin J Anstrom, C Michael Gibson, Ian C Gilchrist, Alice K Jacobs, Sanjit S Jolly, Roxana Mehran, John C Messenger, L Kristin Newby, Ron Waksman, Mitchell W Krucoff.   

Abstract

Women are at higher risk than men for bleeding and vascular complications after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Compared with femoral access, radial access reduces these complications but may be more challenging in women because of higher rates of radial artery spasm, tortuosity, and occlusion as well as lower rates of procedure success. Whether the safety advantages of radial versus femoral access in women undergoing PCI are outweighed by reduced effectiveness has not been studied. The Study of Access site For Enhancement of PCI for Women is a prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing radial with femoral arterial access in women undergoing PCI. In conjunction with the US Food and Drug Administration's Critical Path Cardiac Safety Research Consortium, this study embeds the randomized clinical trial into the existing infrastructure of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry through the National Institute of Health's National Cardiovascular Research Infrastructure. The primary efficacy end point is a composite of bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium types 2, 3, or 5) or vascular complication requiring intervention occurring at 72 hours after PCI or by hospital discharge. The primary feasibility end point is procedure success. Secondary end points include procedure duration, contrast volume, radiation dose, quality of life, and a composite of 30-day death, vascular complication, or unplanned revascularization.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24016489      PMCID: PMC4169992          DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  21 in total

Review 1.  Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Sanjit S Jolly; Shoaib Amlani; Martial Hamon; Salim Yusuf; Shamir R Mehta
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  Radial approach: what about the learning curve?

Authors:  Y Louvard; T Lefevre; M C Morice
Journal:  Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn       Date:  1997-12

3.  A randomized study comparing same-day home discharge and abciximab bolus only to overnight hospitalization and abciximab bolus and infusion after transradial coronary stent implantation.

Authors:  Olivier F Bertrand; Robert De Larochellière; Josep Rodés-Cabau; Guy Proulx; Onil Gleeton; Can Manh Nguyen; Jean-Pierre Déry; Gérald Barbeau; Bernard Noël; Eric Larose; Paul Poirier; Louis Roy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Incidence, predictors, and prognostic implications of bleeding and blood transfusion following percutaneous coronary interventions.

Authors:  Timothy D Kinnaird; Eugenio Stabile; Gary S Mintz; Cheol Whan Lee; Daniel A Canos; Natalie Gevorkian; Ellen E Pinnow; Kenneth M Kent; Augusto D Pichard; Lowell F Satler; Neil J Weissman; Joseph Lindsay; Shmuel Fuchs
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Impact of major bleeding on 30-day mortality and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes: an analysis from the ACUITY Trial.

Authors:  Steven V Manoukian; Frederick Feit; Roxana Mehran; Michele D Voeltz; Ramin Ebrahimi; Martial Hamon; George D Dangas; A Michael Lincoff; Harvey D White; Jeffrey W Moses; Spencer B King; E Magnus Ohman; Gregg W Stone
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-03-09       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Association of the arterial access site at angioplasty with transfusion and mortality: the M.O.R.T.A.L study (Mortality benefit Of Reduced Transfusion after percutaneous coronary intervention via the Arm or Leg).

Authors:  A J Chase; E B Fretz; W P Warburton; W P Klinke; R G Carere; D Pi; B Berry; J D Hilton
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Adoption of radial access and comparison of outcomes to femoral access in percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated report from the national cardiovascular data registry (2007-2012).

Authors:  Dmitriy N Feldman; Rajesh V Swaminathan; Lisa A Kaltenbach; Dmitri V Baklanov; Luke K Kim; S Chiu Wong; Robert M Minutello; John C Messenger; Issam Moussa; Kirk N Garratt; Robert N Piana; William B Hillegass; Mauricio G Cohen; Ian C Gilchrist; Sunil V Rao
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Prevention of radial artery occlusion-patent hemostasis evaluation trial (PROPHET study): a randomized comparison of traditional versus patency documented hemostasis after transradial catheterization.

Authors:  Samir Pancholy; John Coppola; Tejas Patel; Marie Roke-Thomas
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Impact of female gender and transradial coronary stenting with maximal antiplatelet therapy on bleeding and ischemic outcomes.

Authors:  Helena Tizón-Marcos; Olivier F Bertrand; Josep Rodés-Cabau; Eric Larose; Valérie Gaudreault; Rodrigo Bagur; Onil Gleeton; Javier Courtis; Louis Roy; Paul Poirier; Olivier Costerousse; Robert De Larochellière
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2009-01-31       Impact factor: 4.749

10.  Major femoral bleeding complications after percutaneous coronary intervention: incidence, predictors, and impact on long-term survival among 17,901 patients treated at the Mayo Clinic from 1994 to 2005.

Authors:  Brendan J Doyle; Henry H Ting; Malcolm R Bell; Ryan J Lennon; Verghese Mathew; Mandeep Singh; David R Holmes; Charanjit S Rihal
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 11.195

View more
  27 in total

1.  Evaluating the generalizability of a large streamlined cardiovascular trial: comparing hospitals and patients in the dual antiplatelet therapy study versus the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.

Authors:  Robert W Yeh; Matthew J Czarny; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Dean J Kereiakes; David R Holmes; Ralph G Brindis; W Douglas Weaver; John S Rumsfeld; Matthew T Roe; Sunghee Kim; Priscilla Driscoll-Shempp; Laura Mauri
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2014-11-16

2.  Registry-based trials: a potential model for cost savings?

Authors:  Brett R Anderson; Evelyn G Gotlieb; Kevin Hill; Kimberly E McHugh; Mark A Scheurer; Carlos M Mery; Glenn J Pelletier; Jonathan R Kaltman; Owen J White; Felicia L Trachtenberg; Danielle Hollenbeck-Pringle; Brian W McCrindle; Donna M Sylvester; Aaron W Eckhauser; Sara K Pasquali; Jeffery B Anderson; Marcus S Schamberger; Subhadra Shashidharan; Jeffrey P Jacobs; Marshall L Jacobs; Marko Boskovski; Jane W Newburger; Meena Nathan
Journal:  Cardiol Young       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 1.093

3.  Site selection for heart failure clinical trials in the USA.

Authors:  Matthew E Harinstein; Javed Butler; Stephen J Greene; Gregg C Fonarow; Norman L Stockbridge; Christopher M O'Connor; Marc A Pfeffer; Mandeep R Mehra; Scott D Solomon; Clyde W Yancy; Mona Fiuzat; Robert J Mentz; Sean P Collins; John J V McMurray; Muthiah Vaduganathan; Preston M Dunnmon; Giuseppe M C Rosano; Wilfried Dinh; Frank Misselwitz; Robert O Bonow; Mihai Gheorghiade
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.214

4.  Designing effective drug and device development programs for hospitalized heart failure: a proposal for pretrial registries.

Authors:  Stephen J Greene; Ami N Shah; Javed Butler; Andrew P Ambrosy; Stefan D Anker; Ovidiu Chioncel; Sean P Collins; Wilfried Dinh; Preston M Dunnmon; Gregg C Fonarow; Carolyn S P Lam; Robert J Mentz; Burkert Pieske; Lothar Roessig; Giuseppe M C Rosano; Naoki Sato; Muthiah Vaduganathan; Mihai Gheorghiade
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 5.  Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia: Lessons learned from past clinical trials and implications for future clinical trials.

Authors:  Sean D Pokorney; Daniel J Friedman; Hugh Calkins; David J Callans; Emile G Daoud; Paolo Della-Bella; Kevin P Jackson; Kalyanam Shivkumar; Samir Saba; John Sapp; William G Stevenson; Sana M Al-Khatib
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 6.  Registry-based randomized clinical trials--a new clinical trial paradigm.

Authors:  Stefan James; Sunil V Rao; Christopher B Granger
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 7.  Good Clinical Practice Guidance and Pragmatic Clinical Trials: Balancing the Best of Both Worlds.

Authors:  Robert J Mentz; Adrian F Hernandez; Lisa G Berdan; Tyrus Rorick; Emily C O'Brien; Jenny C Ibarra; Lesley H Curtis; Eric D Peterson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Large simple trials: really, it can't be that simple!

Authors:  Robert M Califf
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 9.  Contemporary use of real-world data for clinical trial conduct in the United States: a scoping review.

Authors:  James R Rogers; Junghwan Lee; Ziheng Zhou; Ying Kuen Cheung; George Hripcsak; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Embedding clinical interventions into observational studies.

Authors:  Anne B Newman; M Larissa Avilés-Santa; Garnet Anderson; Gerardo Heiss; Wm James Howard; Mitchell Krucoff; Lewis H Kuller; Cora E Lewis; Jennifer G Robinson; Herman Taylor; Roberto P Treviño; William Weintraub
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 2.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.