Literature DB >> 21146655

Rationale and design of the dual antiplatelet therapy study, a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial to assess the effectiveness and safety of 12 versus 30 months of dual antiplatelet therapy in subjects undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with either drug-eluting stent or bare metal stent placement for the treatment of coronary artery lesions.

Laura Mauri1, Dean J Kereiakes, Sharon-Lise T Normand, Stephen D Wiviott, David J Cohen, David R Holmes, Sripal Bangalore, Donald E Cutlip, Michael Pencina, Joseph M Massaro.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and thienopyridines (clopidogrel or prasugrel) is required after placement of coronary stents to prevent thrombotic complications. Although current clinical practice guidelines recommend 12-month treatment after drug-eluting stent placement, even longer durations may prevent thrombotic events. STUDY
DESIGN: The Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) Study is comparing the benefits and risks of 12 versus 30 months of dual antiplatelet therapy in preventing stent thrombosis or major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in subjects undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the treatment of coronary artery obstructive lesions. The DAPT Study is a multicenter, international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that will enroll 15,245 subjects treated with drug-eluting stent (DES) and 5,400 subjects treated with bare-metal stents (BMS). All subjects will receive 12 months of open-label thienopyridine treatment in addition to aspirin. After 12 months, subjects who are free from death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (MACCE), repeat revascularization, and GUSTO (Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries) moderate or severe bleeding events will be randomized to receive either 18 additional months of thienopyridine (clopidogrel or prasugrel) (30 month DAPT arm) or placebo (12 month DAPT arm) plus aspirin. Coprimary end points are MACCE and stent thrombosis. The primary safety end point is GUSTO moderate or severe bleeding.
CONCLUSIONS: This randomized trial is designed to define the relative safety and effectiveness of 12 versus 30 months of dual antiplatelet therapy across the broad spectrum of patients receiving coronary stents.
Copyright © 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21146655     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.07.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  40 in total

1.  Twelve or 30 months of dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stents.

Authors:  Laura Mauri; Dean J Kereiakes; Robert W Yeh; Priscilla Driscoll-Shempp; Donald E Cutlip; P Gabriel Steg; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Eugene Braunwald; Stephen D Wiviott; David J Cohen; David R Holmes; Mitchell W Krucoff; James Hermiller; Harold L Dauerman; Daniel I Simon; David E Kandzari; Kirk N Garratt; David P Lee; Thomas K Pow; Peter Ver Lee; Michael J Rinaldi; Joseph M Massaro
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-11-16       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Evaluating the generalizability of a large streamlined cardiovascular trial: comparing hospitals and patients in the dual antiplatelet therapy study versus the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.

Authors:  Robert W Yeh; Matthew J Czarny; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Dean J Kereiakes; David R Holmes; Ralph G Brindis; W Douglas Weaver; John S Rumsfeld; Matthew T Roe; Sunghee Kim; Priscilla Driscoll-Shempp; Laura Mauri
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2014-11-16

Review 3.  The importance of the endothelium in atherothrombosis and coronary stenting.

Authors:  Fumiyuki Otsuka; Aloke V Finn; Saami K Yazdani; Masataka Nakano; Frank D Kolodgie; Renu Virmani
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 4.  Recent advances in antithrombotic therapy after acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Alexis Matteau; Deepak L Bhatt
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Balancing the risks of bleeding and stent thrombosis: a decision analytic model to compare durations of dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stents.

Authors:  Pallav Garg; Benjamin Z Galper; David J Cohen; Robert W Yeh; Laura Mauri
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 4.749

6.  Long-term follow-up of Chinese herbal medicines combined with conventional treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Pei-Li Wang; Lei Zhang; Shao-Li Wang; Qiao-Ning Yang; Zhu-Ye Gao; Jian-Peng Du; Da-Wu Zhang; Chang-Geng Fu; Feng Gu; Hao Xu; Li-Zhi Li; Cheng-Long Wang; Da-Zhuo Shi
Journal:  Chin J Integr Med       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 1.978

7.  Healing the injured vessel wall using microRNA-facilitated gene delivery.

Authors:  Mark W Feinberg
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Impact of Optimal Medical Therapy in the Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Study.

Authors:  Charles D Resor; Ashwin Nathan; Dean J Kereiakes; Robert W Yeh; Joseph M Massaro; Donald E Cutlip; P Gabriel Steg; Wen-Hua Hsieh; Laura Mauri
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  TransRadial Education and Therapeutics (TREAT): shifting the balance of safety and efficacy of antithrombotic agents in percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the Cardiac Safety Research Consortium.

Authors:  Connie N Hess; Sunil V Rao; David F Kong; Julie M Miller; Kevin J Anstrom; Olivier F Bertrand; Jean-Philippe Collet; Mark B Effron; Benjamin C Eloff; Emmanuel O Fadiran; Andrew Farb; Ian C Gilchrist; David R Holmes; Alice K Jacobs; Prashant Kaul; L Kristin Newby; David R Rutledge; Dale R Tavris; Thomas T Tsai; Roseann M White; Eric D Peterson; Mitchell W Krucoff
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 10.  Another view of personalized medicine: optimizing stent selection on the basis of predicted benefit in percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Neil J Wimmer; Robert W Yeh
Journal:  Trends Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 6.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.