M Stattin1, C Zehetner, N E Bechrakis, L Speicher. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Österreich, martin.stattin@uki.at.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The choice of a suitable intraocular lens (IOL) and the calculation of postoperative refractive error is one of the most intriguing challenges of modern cataract surgery. This clinical trial compared the accuracy of two laser-assisted optical biometers, the IOL-Master 500 (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany) and the Lenstar LS900 (Haag-Streit, Bern, Switzerland) without taking the postoperative results into consideration. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Artificial lenses (Alcon Pharma) for 114 eyes of 67 patients were measured using both biometric instruments. The deviation of the presumed refractive error from the desired preoperative refractive target was calculated with different formulae (i.e. SRK/T, HofferQ, Haigis and SRKII) based on the intraoperatively chosen IOL. The differences between both instruments were compared using Student's t-test. RESULTS: Using the SRKII formula a mean difference between the IOL-Master and the Lenstar of 0.07 D (p = 0.002) was calculated for 95 eyes, SRK/T used on 47 eyes showed a difference of 0.04 D (p = 0.27), HofferQ measured 0.09 D (p = 0.0001) between both instruments for 88 eyes and the Haigis formula also showed a mean difference of 0.09 D (p = 0.001) based on the calculations of 106 eyes. CONCLUSION: Both instruments gave reproducible and accurate results with only a small deviation from the desired target refraction and can therefore be considered as comparable for the calculation of IOLs. Statistically significant differences in the results were found when using the SRKII, HofferQ and Haigis formulae but these were too low to have any influence on the choice of IOL to be implanted.
BACKGROUND: The choice of a suitable intraocular lens (IOL) and the calculation of postoperative refractive error is one of the most intriguing challenges of modern cataract surgery. This clinical trial compared the accuracy of two laser-assisted optical biometers, the IOL-Master 500 (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany) and the Lenstar LS900 (Haag-Streit, Bern, Switzerland) without taking the postoperative results into consideration. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Artificial lenses (Alcon Pharma) for 114 eyes of 67 patients were measured using both biometric instruments. The deviation of the presumed refractive error from the desired preoperative refractive target was calculated with different formulae (i.e. SRK/T, HofferQ, Haigis and SRKII) based on the intraoperatively chosen IOL. The differences between both instruments were compared using Student's t-test. RESULTS: Using the SRKII formula a mean difference between the IOL-Master and the Lenstar of 0.07 D (p = 0.002) was calculated for 95 eyes, SRK/T used on 47 eyes showed a difference of 0.04 D (p = 0.27), HofferQ measured 0.09 D (p = 0.0001) between both instruments for 88 eyes and the Haigis formula also showed a mean difference of 0.09 D (p = 0.001) based on the calculations of 106 eyes. CONCLUSION: Both instruments gave reproducible and accurate results with only a small deviation from the desired target refraction and can therefore be considered as comparable for the calculation of IOLs. Statistically significant differences in the results were found when using the SRKII, HofferQ and Haigis formulae but these were too low to have any influence on the choice of IOL to be implanted.
Authors: Barbara Kiss; Oliver Findl; Rupert Menapace; Matthias Wirtitsch; Wolfgang Drexler; Christoph K Hitzenberger; Adolf F Fercher Journal: J Cataract Refract Surg Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 3.351