Literature DB >> 25389109

Inclusive fitness and sexual conflict: how population structure can modulate the battle of the sexes.

Tommaso Pizzari1, Jay M Biernaskie, Pau Carazo.   

Abstract

Competition over reproductive opportunities among members of one sex often harms the opposite sex, creating a conflict of interest between individual males and females. Recently, this battle of the sexes has become a paradigm in the study of intersexual coevolution. Here, we review recent theoretical and empirical advances suggesting that - as in any scenario of intraspecific competition - selfishness (competitiveness) can be influenced by the genetic relatedness of competitors. When competitors are positively related (e.g. siblings), an individual may refrain from harming its competitor(s) and their mate(s) because this can improve the focal individual's inclusive fitness. These findings reveal that population genetic structure might be of paramount importance when studying the battle of the sexes. We conclude by identifying some new lines of research at the interface of sexual selection and social evolution.
© 2015 The Authors. Bioessays published by WILEY Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cooperation; kin selection; sexual conflict; sexual selection; social evolution; tragedy of the commons

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25389109     DOI: 10.1002/bies.201400130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioessays        ISSN: 0265-9247            Impact factor:   4.345


  19 in total

1.  Are flies kind to kin? The role of intra- and inter-sexual relatedness in mediating reproductive conflict.

Authors:  Emily S Martin; Tristan A F Long
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Differential female sociality is linked with the fine-scale structure of sexual interactions in replicate groups of red junglefowl, Gallus gallus.

Authors:  Grant C McDonald; Lewis G Spurgin; Eleanor A Fairfield; David S Richardson; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Males harm females less when competing with familiar relatives.

Authors:  Samuel J Lymbery; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Synchronized emergence under diatom sperm competition.

Authors:  Yuka Shirokawa; Masakazu Shimada
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Does kin selection moderate sexual conflict in Drosophila?

Authors:  Adam K Chippindale; Meredith Berggren; Joshua H M Alpern; Robert Montgomerie
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Kin-mediated plasticity in alternative reproductive tactics.

Authors:  Samuel J Lymbery; Joseph L Tomkins; Bruno A Buzatto; David J Hosken
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 5.530

7.  The evolution of sex peptide: sexual conflict, cooperation, and coevolution.

Authors:  Ben R Hopkins; Jennifer C Perry
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2022-03-06

8.  Male relatedness and familiarity are required to modulate male-induced harm to females in Drosophila.

Authors:  Sally Le Page; Irem Sepil; Ewan Flintham; Tommaso Pizzari; Pau Carazo; Stuart Wigby
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Related male Drosophila melanogaster reared together as larvae fight less and sire longer lived daughters.

Authors:  Pau Carazo; Jennifer C Perry; Fern Johnson; Tommaso Pizzari; Stuart Wigby
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Feed-backs among inbreeding, inbreeding depression in sperm traits, and sperm competition can drive evolution of costly polyandry.

Authors:  Greta Bocedi; Jane M Reid
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 3.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.