Literature DB >> 26269501

Does kin selection moderate sexual conflict in Drosophila?

Adam K Chippindale1, Meredith Berggren2, Joshua H M Alpern2, Robert Montgomerie2.   

Abstract

Two recent studies provide provocative experimental findings about the potential influence of kin recognition and cooperation on the level of sexual conflict in Drosophila melanogaster. In both studies, male fruit flies apparently curbed their mate-harming behaviours in the presence of a few familiar or related males, suggesting some form of cooperation mediated by kin selection. In one study, the reduction in agonistic behaviour by brothers apparently rendered them vulnerable to dramatic loss of paternity share when competing with an unrelated male. If these results are robust and generalizable, fruit flies could be a major new focus for the experimental study of kin selection and social evolution. In our opinion, however, the restrictive conditions required for male cooperation to be adaptive in this species make it unlikely to evolve. We investigated these phenomena in two different populations of D. melanogaster using protocols very similar to those in the two previous studies. Our experiments show no evidence for a reduction in mate harm based upon either relatedness or familiarity between males, and no reduction in male reproductive success when two brothers are in the presence of an unfamiliar, unrelated, 'foreign' male. Thus, the reduction of sexual conflict owing to male cooperation does not appear to be a general feature of the species, at least under domestication, and these contrasting results call for further investigation: in new populations, in the field and in the laboratory populations in which these phenomena have been reported.
© 2015 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drosophila; cooperation; familiarity; kin selection; mate harm; sexual conflict

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26269501      PMCID: PMC4632634          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.1417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  19 in total

1.  Breakdown in correlations during laboratory evolution. I. Comparative analyses of Drosophila populations.

Authors:  John P Phelan; Margaret A Archer; Kelly A Beckman; Adam K Chippindale; Theodore J Nusbaum; Michael R Rose
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Drosophila melanogaster's history as a human commensal.

Authors:  Andreas Keller
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Highly structured Asian Drosophila melanogaster populations: a new tool for hitchhiking mapping?

Authors:  Christian Schlötterer; Hannah Neumeier; Carla Sousa; Viola Nolte
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Inclusive fitness and sexual conflict: how population structure can modulate the battle of the sexes.

Authors:  Tommaso Pizzari; Jay M Biernaskie; Pau Carazo
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 4.345

5.  Gut microbiota and kin recognition.

Authors:  Anne Lizé; Raegan McKay; Zenobia Lewis
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I.

Authors:  W D Hamilton
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 2.691

7.  Selection on stress resistance increases longevity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M R Rose; L N Vu; S U Park; J L Graves
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.032

8.  Multiple mating in wild Drosophila melanogaster revisited by microsatellite analysis.

Authors:  M Imhof; B Harr; G Brem; C Schlötterer
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 6.185

9.  Mating experience and food deprivation modulate odor preference and dispersal in Drosophila melanogaster males.

Authors:  Shu-Ping Wang; Wei-Yan Guo; Shahid Arain Muhammad; Rui-Rui Chen; Li-Li Mu; Guo-Qing Li
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.857

10.  Within-group male relatedness reduces harm to females in Drosophila.

Authors:  Pau Carazo; Cedric K W Tan; Felicity Allen; Stuart Wigby; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  11 in total

1.  Are flies kind to kin? The role of intra- and inter-sexual relatedness in mediating reproductive conflict.

Authors:  Emily S Martin; Tristan A F Long
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Males harm females less when competing with familiar relatives.

Authors:  Samuel J Lymbery; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Males optimally balance selfish and kin-selected strategies of sexual competition in the guppy.

Authors:  Mitchel J Daniel; Robert J Williamson
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 15.460

4.  Inbreeding parents should invest more resources in fewer offspring.

Authors:  A Bradley Duthie; Aline M Lee; Jane M Reid
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Male relatedness and familiarity are required to modulate male-induced harm to females in Drosophila.

Authors:  Sally Le Page; Irem Sepil; Ewan Flintham; Tommaso Pizzari; Pau Carazo; Stuart Wigby
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Kin selection promotes female productivity and cooperation between the sexes.

Authors:  Aleksandra Łukasiewicz; Agnieszka Szubert-Kruszyńska; Jacek Radwan
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 14.136

7.  Sexual selection modulates genetic conflicts and patterns of genomic imprinting.

Authors:  Gonçalo S Faria; Susana A M Varela; Andy Gardner
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Sex-biased demography modulates male harm across the genome.

Authors:  Thomas J Hitchcock; Andy Gardner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  The contrasting role of male relatedness in different mechanisms of sexual selection in red junglefowl.

Authors:  Cedric Kai Wei Tan; Philippa Doyle; Emma Bagshaw; David S Richardson; Stuart Wigby; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Kin but less than kind: within-group male relatedness does not increase female fitness in seed beetles.

Authors:  Elena C Berg; Martin I Lind; Shannon Monahan; Sophie Bricout; Alexei A Maklakov
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.