Literature DB >> 34344179

Kin-mediated plasticity in alternative reproductive tactics.

Samuel J Lymbery1,2, Joseph L Tomkins2, Bruno A Buzatto2,3, David J Hosken1.   

Abstract

Conditional strategies occur when the relative fitness pay-off from expressing a given phenotype is contingent upon environmental circumstances. This conditional strategy model underlies cases of alternative reproductive tactics, in which individuals of one sex employ different means to obtain reproduction. How kin structure affects the expression of alternative reproductive tactics remains unexplored. We address this using the mite Rhizoglyphus echinopus, in which large males develop into aggressive 'fighters' and small males develop into non-aggressive 'scramblers.' Because only fighters kill their rivals, they should incur a greater indirect fitness cost when competing with their relatives, and thus fighter expression could be reduced in the presence of relatives. We raised mites in full-sibling or mixed-sibship groups and found that fighters were more common at higher body weights in full-sibling groups, not less common as we predicted (small individuals were almost exclusively scramblers in both treatments). This result could be explained if relatedness and cue variability are interpreted signals of population density, since fighters are more common at low densities in this species. Alternatively, our results may indicate that males compete more intensely with relatives in this species. We provide the first evidence of kin-mediated plasticity in the expression of alternative reproductive tactics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alternative reproductive tactics; conditional strategy; kin selection; phenotypic plasticity; population density; relatedness

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34344179      PMCID: PMC8334832          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.1069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.530


  41 in total

1.  Testing Hamilton's rule with competition between relatives.

Authors:  S A West; M G Murray; C A Machado; A S Griffin; E A Herre
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-01-25       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Male morph determination in Rhizoglyphus echinopus (Acaridae).

Authors:  J Radwan
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.132

3.  Does genetic diversity reduce sibling competition?

Authors:  J David Aguirre; Dustin J Marshall
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-08-13       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Male-derived cuticular hydrocarbons signal sperm competition intensity and affect ejaculate expenditure in crickets.

Authors:  Melissa L Thomas; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Alternative reproductive strategies and tactics: diversity within sexes.

Authors:  M R Gross
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  ON THE COEXISTENCE AND COEVOLUTION OF ASEXUAL AND SEXUAL COMPETITORS.

Authors:  Ted J Case; Mark L Taper
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Heritability of male attractiveness persists despite evidence for unreliable sexual signals in Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  F C Ingleby; J Hunt; D J Hosken
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 2.411

8.  Sib competition can favour sex in two ways.

Authors:  J P Young
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1981-02-21       Impact factor: 2.691

9.  Population density drives the local evolution of a threshold dimorphism.

Authors:  Joseph L Tomkins; Gordon S Brown
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-10-28       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Genetic variation underlying the expression of a polyphenism.

Authors:  Bruno A Buzatto; L W Simmons; J L Tomkins
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 2.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.