Literature DB >> 25385490

Impact of gender on success and complication rates after ureteroscopy.

M Özsoy1, Ö Acar, K Sarica, Z Saratlija-Novakovic, H Fajkovic, D Librenjak, T Esen, N Scheffbuch, C Seitz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of gender differences on treatment success, intraoperative and postoperative complications in patients undergoing ureteroscopy (URS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospectively maintained database of 927 consecutively performed ureteroscopies on solitary ureteral stones in four different centers was retrospectively analyzed. Stones were detected with preoperative computed tomography scans or intravenous urography imaging. Patients received intravenous antibiotics as perioperative prophylaxis. Patients with symptomatic urinary tract infections (UTI) prior to surgery were excluded. Follow-up was up to 2 weeks after URS or stent removal.
RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty-six women and 641 men were included in this study. Mean stone size was 9 mm (range 2-35 mm). A double-J stent was placed in 240 (83 %) women and 527 (82 %) men at the end of surgery (p = 0.075). There was no significant gender difference in terms of stent dislocation (p = 0.239). Two hundred and fifty-one women (87 %) and 564 men (87 %) were stone-free after the first procedure (p = 0.917). Intraoperative complications were observed in 14 (4.8 %) women and 37 (5.9 %) men (p = 0.313). Severe UTI presenting with fever (>38 °C) and requiring prolonged hospitalization with parenteral antibiotics were observed in 11 (3 %) women and 8 (1 %) men postoperatively. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.025).
CONCLUSION: No significant differences between female and male patients harboring ureteral stones with respect to intraoperative complications were detected. Although stone characteristics were comparable between groups, a small number of women had significantly more severe UTI's postoperatively. Our current therapy regimen for URS seems to be efficient and safe both for females and males.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25385490     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-014-1435-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  15 in total

Review 1.  Ureteropyeloscopic treatment of ureteral and intrarenal calculi.

Authors:  M Grasso
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.241

2.  Results with 7.5F versus 10F rigid ureteroscopes in treatment of ureteral calculi.

Authors:  Ozgur Yaycioglu; Sezgin Guvel; Ferhat Kilinc; Tulga Egilmez; Hakan Ozkardes
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy in the treatment of ureteral calculi: a prospective study.

Authors:  W L Strohmaier; G Schubert; T Rosenkranz; A Weigl
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  A nomogram predicting severe adverse events after ureteroscopic lithotripsy: 12  372 patients in a Japanese national series.

Authors:  Toru Sugihara; Hideo Yasunaga; Hiromasa Horiguchi; Hiroaki Nishimatsu; Haruki Kume; Kazuhiko Ohe; Shinya Matsuda; Kiyohide Fushimi; Yukio Homma
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 5.  Management of ureteric stones.

Authors:  Theodore Anagnostou; David Tolley
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Ureteroscopic management of lower ureteric calculi: a 15-year single-centre experience.

Authors:  Osama M Elashry; Abdelnaser K Elgamasy; Magdy A Sabaa; Mohamed Abo-Elenien; Mohamed Adel Omar; Hassan H Eltatawy; Shawky A El-Abd
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Clavien classification of semirigid ureteroscopy complications: a prospective study.

Authors:  Swarnendu Mandal; Apul Goel; Manish Kumar Singh; Rohit Kathpalia; Deepak S Nagathan; Satya N Sankhwar; Vishwajeet Singh; Bhupender P Singh; Rahul J Sinha; Divakar Dalela
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Assessment of stricture formation with the ureteral access sheath.

Authors:  Fernando C Delvecchio; Brian K Auge; Ricardo M Brizuela; Alon Z Weizer; Ari D Silverstein; Costas D Lallas; Paul K Pietrow; David M Albala; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 9.  Epidemiological gender-specific aspects in urolithiasis.

Authors:  Christian Seitz; Harun Fajkovic
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Clinical outcome of ureteroscopic lithotripsy for 2,129 patients with ureteral stones.

Authors:  Toshifumi Kurahashi; Hideaki Miyake; Nobutoshi Oka; Masashi Shinozaki; Atsushi Takenaka; Isao Hara; Masato Fujisawa
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2007-04-24
View more
  5 in total

1.  Study of ureteral and renal morphometry on the outcome of ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy: The critical role of maximum ureteral wall thickness at the site of ureteral stone impaction.

Authors:  Amit Kumar Mishra; Santosh Kumar; Lalgudi Narayan Dorairajan; Ramanitharan Manikandan; G Ramkumar; K S Sreerag; Jayesh Kumar Mittal
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2020-06-10

2.  Identification of factors associated with postoperative febrile urinary tract infection after ureteroscopy for urinary stones.

Authors:  Koji Mitsuzuka; Osamu Nakano; Norio Takahashi; Makoto Satoh
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 3.  Predictors of Urinary Infections and Urosepsis After Ureteroscopy for Stone Disease: a Systematic Review from EAU Section of Urolithiasis (EULIS).

Authors:  Shreya Chugh; Amelia Pietropaolo; Emanuele Montanari; Kemal Sarica; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Gender Differences in Kidney Stone Disease (KSD): Findings from a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kathryn Gillams; Patrick Juliebø-Jones; Siri Øvereng Juliebø; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Secondary signs on preoperative CT as predictive factors for febrile urinary tract infection after ureteroscopic lithotripsy.

Authors:  Jin Woo Kim; You Jin Lee; Yun-Sok Ha; Jun Nyung Lee; Hyun Tae Kim; So Young Chun; Bum Soo Kim
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 2.264

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.