Literature DB >> 18485033

Ureteroscopic management of lower ureteric calculi: a 15-year single-centre experience.

Osama M Elashry1, Abdelnaser K Elgamasy, Magdy A Sabaa, Mohamed Abo-Elenien, Mohamed Adel Omar, Hassan H Eltatawy, Shawky A El-Abd.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review our 15-year experience with ureteroscopic treatment of distal ureteric calculi and to determine the impact of improved technology and techniques on the efficacy, success and complications of the procedure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 4512 patients who underwent 5133 ureteroscopic procedures for the treatment of distal ureteric calculi at our institution from January 1991 to December 2005. The patient and stone characteristics, treatment variables and clinical outcomes were assessed. Factors such as type of ureteroscope, procedure duration, procedure success, complication rate and hospital stay were evaluated. Data obtained from a cohort of patients that underwent the procedure from 1991 to 1995 (group 1) were statistical compared with those obtained from a cohort of patients from 1996 to 2005 (group 2). Logistic regression analysis was used to identify associated factors with the major complications of ureteroscopy.
RESULTS: Overall, the stone-free rate after the procedure was 94.6%, the mean (sd; range) operative duration was 43 (15.0; 25-120) min, the intraoperative complication rate was 6.67%, the postoperative complication rate was 9.9%, and the mean (sd) hospital stay was 1.7 (1.1) days. The clinical and radiological follow-up (mean 36.8 months) for 71.3% of eligible patients detected only 12 ureteric strictures (0.23%). On comparing group 1 with group 2, the overall success of ureteroscopic stone extraction improved from 85.7% to 97.3% (P < 0.001), significant ureteric perforation decreased from 3.3% to 0.5% (P = 0.05), ureteric avulsion decreased from 1.3 to 0.1% (P < 0.05), ureteric stricture decreased from 0.7% to 0.1% (P < 0.007), the mean (sd) procedure time significantly decreased from 75 (42.9) min to 36.5 (12.5) min (P < 0.001), and the mean hospital stay significantly decreased from 2.5 (1.6) days to 0.5 (1.2) days, with a trend toward outpatient treatment. Logistic regression analysis showed a significant association of the major ureteroscopic complications with increased operative duration, type of ureteroscope used, stone impaction, stone size and surgeon experience.
CONCLUSION: The present series shows the high success rate, with minor complications, that can be achieved with ureteroscopic treatment of distal ureteric calculi. Improvements in ureteroscope design, accessories, technique and experience have led to a significant increase in the success rate and decrease in the complication rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18485033     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07747.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  31 in total

1.  Xenx (Xenolith): preliminary considerations of a new "all-in-one" ureteral guidewire and anti-repulsion device.

Authors:  Emanuele Montanari; Fabrizio Longo; Nicola Macchione; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Emergency ureteroscopic lithotripsy in acute renal colic caused by ureteral calculi: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Mohammed A Al-Ghazo; Ibrahim Fathi Ghalayini; Rami S Al-Azab; Osamah Bani Hani; Ibrahim Bani-Hani; Mohammad Abuharfil; Yazan Haddad
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2011-04-17

3.  Does previous failed ESWL have a negative impact of on the outcome of ureterorenoscopy? A matched pair analysis.

Authors:  Prodromos Philippou; David Payne; Kim Davenport; Anthony G Timoney; Francis X Keeley
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Full-length ureteral avulsion caused by ureteroscopy: report of one case cured by pyeloureterostomy, greater omentum investment, and ureterovesical anastomosis.

Authors:  Peng Gao; Jin Zhu; Yibin Zhou; Yuxi Shan
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 5.  [Management of ureteral stones].

Authors:  M Straub; M Bader; F Strittmatter
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  [Influence of ureter stenting before ureterorenoscopic treatment of ureteral calculi].

Authors:  J Mueller; N Riechert-Mühe; A J Schrader; A Leitenberger; J Steinestel; M A Kuczyk; S Steffens; R Hofmann; J Sotelino
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 7.  Correlation of Operative Time with Outcomes of Ureteroscopy and Stone Treatment: a Systematic Review of Literature.

Authors:  Jenni Lane; Lily Whitehurst; B M Zeeshan Hameed; Theodoros Tokas; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 3.092

8.  Impact of gender on success and complication rates after ureteroscopy.

Authors:  M Özsoy; Ö Acar; K Sarica; Z Saratlija-Novakovic; H Fajkovic; D Librenjak; T Esen; N Scheffbuch; C Seitz
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Efficacy and safety of emergency ureteroscopic management of ureteral calculi.

Authors:  Jun Ho Youn; Sung Soo Kim; Ji Hyeong Yu; Luck Hee Sung; Choong Hee Noh; Jae Yong Chung
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2012-09-19

Review 10.  Ureteroscopy for the management of stone disease.

Authors:  Brian H Eisner; Michael P Kurtz; Stephen P Dretler
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.