Literature DB >> 23107393

Clavien classification of semirigid ureteroscopy complications: a prospective study.

Swarnendu Mandal1, Apul Goel, Manish Kumar Singh, Rohit Kathpalia, Deepak S Nagathan, Satya N Sankhwar, Vishwajeet Singh, Bhupender P Singh, Rahul J Sinha, Divakar Dalela.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively report and grade the perioperative complications of ureteroscopy (URS) for stone removal using a semirigid ureteroscope with the modified Clavien classification system and to identify the determinants of the complications.
METHODS: From August 2010 to November 2011, the prospective data from 120 consecutive patients (71 men and 49 women) who had undergone primary unstented URS at a resident training center were analyzed. Patients with renal failure, pyonephrosis, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and congenital ureteral abnormalities were excluded (n = 29). The data recorded included patient demographics, stone size and location, and complications according to the modified Clavien classification system.
RESULTS: Of the 120 patients, 36 (30%) experienced 79 complications. The stone size was ≤ 10 mm in 56 and >10 mm in 64 patients. The stone location was the lower, mid-, and upper ureter in 62, 58, and 3 patients, respectively. The latter 3 were excluded because of the small sample size. Grade 1, 2, 3a, 3b, 4a, and 4b complications were encountered in 46 (38.3%), 18 (15%), 3 (2.5%), 10 (8.3%), 1 (0.8%), and 1 (0.8%) patient, respectively. The incidence of complications was greater for stones >10 mm, a mid- versus distal ureteral location, impacted stones, and surgery performed by a resident. The incidence was not affected by patient sex, stone laterality, or lithotripter type. The patients with complications had a longer operative time (75 vs 46.5 minutes), longer hospitalization (4.8 vs 1.5 days), and lower stone-free rate (64% vs 97%).
CONCLUSION: Most complications were grade 1-3 (98%), and grade 4 complications were rare (<2%) with URS. The present study is probably the first to prospectively study the complications of URS using the modified Clavien classification system.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23107393     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.05.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  22 in total

1.  Ureteroscopy in proximal ureteral stones after shock wave lithotripsy failure: Is it safe and efficient or dangerous?

Authors:  Muhammet Fatih Kilinc; Omer Gokhan Doluoglu; Tolga Karakan; Ayhan Dalkilic; Nurettin Cem Sonmez; Yasin Aydogmus; Berkan Resorlu
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Simultaneous percutaneous nephrolithotomy and early endoscopic ureteric realignment for iatrogenic ureteropelvic junction avulsion during ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Marawan El Tayeb; Matthew J Mellon; James E Lingeman
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  [Calyceal stones].

Authors:  C Netsch; A J Gross
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  [Effect of the body mass index on outcomes of ureterorenoscopy for renal stones].

Authors:  F Schott; S Knipper; A K Orywal; A J Gross; C Netsch
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  The effect of ureteroscope size in the treatment of ureteral stone: 15-year experience of an endoscopist.

Authors:  Muhammet Fatih Kılınç; Ömer Gökhan Doluoğlu; Tolga Karakan; Ayhan Dalkılıç; Nurettin Cem Sönmez; Cem Nedim Yücetürk; Berkan Reşorlu
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2016-06

6.  Comparison of the clinical efficacy and safety of retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy and ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy in the treatment of obstructive upper ureteral calculi with concurrent urinary tract infections.

Authors:  Jun-Tao Jiang; Wei-Guo Li; Yi-Ping Zhu; Wen-Lan Sun; Wei Zhao; Yuan Ruan; Chen Zhong; Kristofer Wood; Hai-Bin Wei; Shu-Jie Xia; Xiao-Wen Sun
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.161

7.  Retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in comparison with ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the management of impacted upper ureteral stones larger than 12 mm.

Authors:  Yuan Shao; Da-wei Wang; Guo-liang Lu; Zhou-jun Shen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Grading complications after transurethral resection of prostate using modified Clavien classification system and predicting complications using the Charlson comorbidity index.

Authors:  Swarnendu Mandal; Satya N Sankhwar; Rohit Kathpalia; Manish Kumar Singh; Manoj Kumar; Apul Goel; Vishwajeet Singh; Rahul Janak Sinha; Bhupender Pal Singh; Divakar Dalela
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-02-16       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  Impact of gender on success and complication rates after ureteroscopy.

Authors:  M Özsoy; Ö Acar; K Sarica; Z Saratlija-Novakovic; H Fajkovic; D Librenjak; T Esen; N Scheffbuch; C Seitz
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Infective complications after retrograde intrarenal surgery: a new standardized classification system.

Authors:  Francesco Berardinelli; Piergustavo De Francesco; Michele Marchioni; Nicoletta Cera; Silvia Proietti; Derek Hennessey; Orietta Dalpiaz; Cecilia Cracco; Cesare Scoffone; Luigi Schips; Guido Giusti; Luca Cindolo
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 2.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.