Literature DB >> 24162952

Computed tomography-based novel prediction model for the stone-free rate of ureteroscopic lithotripsy.

Jong Wook Kim1, Ji Yun Chae, Jin Wook Kim, Mi Mi Oh, Hong Seok Park, Du Geon Moon, Cheol Yong Yoon.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether computed tomography (CT) parameters can predict the success of ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL) and establish a model for predicting the success rates of a single URSL procedure for the treatment of a single ureteral stone. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 237 patients who underwent URSL for ureteral stones diagnosed by CT between January 2009 and June 2012. Stone-free status was defined as the absence of stones or residual stone fragments <2 mm by ureteroscopy and plain abdominal radiography. We analyzed the correlations between the outcome of URSL and the patients' sex, age, height, body weight, body mass index, and history of ureteral stone. Stone factors such as the diameter (D), stone height (H), volumetric stone burden (VSB; D(2) × H × 5 mm × π × 1/6), estimated stone location (ESL; number of axial cut images between the stone and uretero-vesical junction), tissue rim sign (RS; 0-3), perinephric edema (0-3), hydronephrosis (0-3), and Hounsfield unit (HU) were also analyzed. We then developed a model to predict the probability of successful URSL by applying a logistic model to our data. The success rate of URSL was 85.7% (203/237). Univariate analysis found that stone diameter, length, VSB, ESL, HU and RS significantly affected the stone-free rate. Multivariate analysis indicated that stone diameter, ESL and RS independently influenced the stone-free rate. The logistic model indicated that success rates = 1/[1 + exp{-6.146 + 0.071(D) + 0.153(ESL) + 1.534(RS)}] with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.825. Stone diameter, ESL, and RS were independent predictors of the outcome of a single URSL for a single ureteral stone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24162952     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-013-0609-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  17 in total

Review 1.  Ureteropyeloscopic treatment of ureteral and intrarenal calculi.

Authors:  M Grasso
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.241

Review 2.  Treatment selection and outcomes: ureteral calculi.

Authors:  J Stuart Wolf
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.241

Review 3.  Prospective comparison of unenhanced spiral computed tomography and intravenous urogram in the evaluation of acute flank pain.

Authors:  O F Miller; S K Rineer; S R Reichard; R G Buckley; M S Donovan; I R Graham; W B Goff; C J Kane
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Ureteroscopy with pediatric cystoscope in adults.

Authors:  T M Goodman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Acute ureteral obstruction: value of secondary signs of helical unenhanced CT.

Authors:  R C Smith; M Verga; N Dalrymple; S McCarthy; A T Rosenfield
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  A new scoring system for predicting stone-free rate after retrograde intrarenal surgery: the "resorlu-unsal stone score".

Authors:  Berkan Resorlu; Ali Unsal; Handan Gulec; Derya Oztuna
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Acute ureterolithiasis: incidence of secondary signs on unenhanced helical CT and influence on patient management.

Authors:  G Ege; H Akman; K Kuzucu; S Yildiz
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.350

8.  Transurethral ureteroscopy in women: a ready addition to the urological armamentarium.

Authors:  E S Lyon; J S Kyker; H W Schoenberg
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 9.  Unenhanced helical computed tomography vs intravenous urography in patients with acute flank pain: accuracy and economic impact in a randomized prospective trial.

Authors:  S A Pfister; A Deckart; S Laschke; S Dellas; U Otto; C Buitrago; J Roth; W Wiesner; G Bongartz; T C Gasser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-07-24       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Statistics review 14: Logistic regression.

Authors:  Viv Bewick; Liz Cheek; Jonathan Ball
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2005-01-13       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Usefulness of hounsfield unit and density in the assessment and treatment of urinary stones.

Authors:  Adnan Gücük; Uğur Uyetürk
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2014-11-06

2.  Study of ureteral and renal morphometry on the outcome of ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy: The critical role of maximum ureteral wall thickness at the site of ureteral stone impaction.

Authors:  Amit Kumar Mishra; Santosh Kumar; Lalgudi Narayan Dorairajan; Ramanitharan Manikandan; G Ramkumar; K S Sreerag; Jayesh Kumar Mittal
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2020-06-10

3.  Presentation of a method at the Exploration Stage according to IDEAL: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under local infiltrative anesthesia is a feasible and effective method - retrospective analysis of 439 patients.

Authors:  Thorsten H Ecke; Dimitri Barski; Guido Weingart; Carsten Lange; Steffen Hallmann; Jürgen Ruttloff; Friedhelm Wawroschek; Holger Gerullis
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2017-02-25       Impact factor: 3.738

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.