Literature DB >> 25373724

Pain reduction in myofascial pain syndrome by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation combined with standard treatment: a randomized controlled study.

Piyaraid Sakrajai1, Taweesak Janyacharoen, Mark P Jensen, Kittisak Sawanyawisuth, Narong Auvichayapat, Orathai Tunkamnerdthai, Keattichai Keeratitanont, Paradee Auvichayapat.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) in the shoulder is among the most prevalent pain problems in the middle-aged population worldwide. Evidence suggests that peripheral and central sensitization may play an important role in the development and maintenance of shoulder MPS. Given previous research supporting the potential efficacy of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for modulating pain-related brain activity in individuals with refractory central pain, we hypothesized that anodal tDCS when applied over the primary motor cortex (M1) combined with standard treatment will be more effective for reducing pain in patients with MPS than standard treatment alone. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Study participants were randomized to receive either (1) standard treatment with 5 consecutive days of 1 mA anodal tDCS over M1 for 20 minutes; or (2) standard treatment plus sham tDCS. Measures of pain intensity, shoulder passive range of motion (PROM), analgesic medication use, and self-reported physical functioning were administered before treatment and again at posttreatment and 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-week follow-up.
RESULTS: Thirty-one patients with MPS were enrolled. Participants assigned to the active tDCS condition reported significantly more pretreatment to posttreatment reductions in pain intensity that were maintained at 1-week posttreatment, and significant improvement in shoulder adduction PROM at 1-week follow-up than participants assigned to the sham tDCS condition.
CONCLUSIONS: Five consecutive days of anodal tDCS over M1 combined with standard treatment appears to reduce pain intensity and may improve PROM, faster than standard treatment alone. Further tests on the efficacy and duration of effects of tDCS in the treatment of MPS are warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25373724      PMCID: PMC4224017          DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Pain        ISSN: 0749-8047            Impact factor:   3.442


  41 in total

1.  INTRACELLULAR ACTIVITIES AND EVOKED POTENTIAL CHANGES DURING POLARIZATION OF MOTOR CORTEX.

Authors:  D P PURPURA; J G MCMURTRY
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Modulating parameters of excitability during and after transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Michael A Nitsche; Antje Seeber; Kai Frommann; Cornelia Carmen Klein; Christian Rochford; Maren S Nitsche; Kristina Fricke; David Liebetanz; Nicolas Lang; Andrea Antal; Walter Paulus; Frithjof Tergau
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the challenge of coil placement: a comparison of conventional and stereotaxic neuronavigational strategies.

Authors:  Roland Sparing; Dorothee Buelte; Ingo G Meister; Tomás Paus; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex ameliorates chronic pain and reduces short intracortical inhibition.

Authors:  Andrea Antal; Daniella Terney; Stefanie Kühnl; Walter Paulus
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.612

Review 5.  Research design considerations for confirmatory chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations.

Authors:  Robert H Dworkin; Dennis C Turk; Sarah Peirce-Sandner; Ralf Baron; Nicholas Bellamy; Laurie B Burke; Amy Chappell; Kevin Chartier; Charles S Cleeland; Ann Costello; Penney Cowan; Rozalina Dimitrova; Susan Ellenberg; John T Farrar; Jacqueline A French; Ian Gilron; Sharon Hertz; Alejandro R Jadad; Gary W Jay; Jarkko Kalliomäki; Nathaniel P Katz; Robert D Kerns; Donald C Manning; Michael P McDermott; Patrick J McGrath; Arvind Narayana; Linda Porter; Steve Quessy; Bob A Rappaport; Christine Rauschkolb; Bryce B Reeve; Thomas Rhodes; Cristina Sampaio; David M Simpson; Joseph W Stauffer; Gerold Stucki; Jeffrey Tobias; Richard E White; James Witter
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  Electrical stimulation of motor cortex for pain control: a combined PET-scan and electrophysiological study.

Authors:  L García-Larrea; R Peyron; P Mertens; M C Gregoire; F Lavenne; D Le Bars; P Convers; F Mauguière; M Sindou; B Laurent
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  Safety aspects of transcranial direct current stimulation concerning healthy subjects and patients.

Authors:  Csaba Poreisz; Klára Boros; Andrea Antal; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 4.077

8.  Transcranial DC stimulation coupled with TENS for the treatment of chronic pain: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Paulo S Boggio; Edson J Amancio; Claudio F Correa; Sofia Cecilio; Claudia Valasek; Zahid Bajwa; Steven D Freedman; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Dylan J Edwards; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.442

9.  Validation of the Brief Pain Inventory for chronic nonmalignant pain.

Authors:  Gabriel Tan; Mark P Jensen; John I Thornby; Bilal F Shanti
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.820

10.  Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the thalamus in patients with chronic neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Pradip M Pattany; Robert P Yezierski; Eva G Widerström-Noga; Brian C Bowen; Alberto Martinez-Arizala; Bernardo R Garcia; Robert M Quencer
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as a Therapeutic Tool for Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Camila Bonin Pinto; Beatriz Teixeira Costa; Dante Duarte; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  J ECT       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.635

2.  Noninvasive brain stimulation combined with exercise in chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alejandra Cardenas-Rojas; Kevin Pacheco-Barrios; Stefano Giannoni-Luza; Oscar Rivera-Torrejon; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Expert Rev Neurother       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 4.618

Review 3.  Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain.

Authors:  Neil E O'Connell; Louise Marston; Sally Spencer; Lorraine H DeSouza; Benedict M Wand
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-04-13

4.  Combined neuromodulatory interventions in acute experimental pain: assessment of melatonin and non-invasive brain stimulation.

Authors:  Nádia Regina Jardim da Silva; Gabriela Laste; Alícia Deitos; Luciana Cadore Stefani; Gustavo Cambraia-Canto; Iraci L S Torres; Andre R Brunoni; Felipe Fregni; Wolnei Caumo
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.558

5.  Understanding Negative Results in tDCS Research: The Importance of Neural Targeting and Cortical Engagement.

Authors:  Aurore Thibaut; Ross Zafonte; Leslie R Morse; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Does Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined with Peripheral Electrical Stimulation Have an Additive Effect in the Control of Hip Joint Osteonecrosis Pain Associated with Sickle Cell Disease? A Protocol for a One-Session Double Blind, Block-Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Tiago da Silva Lopes; Wellington Dos Santos Silva; Sânzia B Ribeiro; Camila A Figueiredo; Fernanda Q Campbell; Gildasio de Cerqueira Daltro; Antônio Valenzuela; Pedro Montoya; Rita de C S Lucena; Abrahão F Baptista
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 7.  Methods and strategies of tDCS for the treatment of pain: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Kevin Pacheco-Barrios; Alejandra Cardenas-Rojas; Aurore Thibaut; Beatriz Costa; Isadora Ferreira; Wolnei Caumo; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 3.166

8.  Evidence-Based Guidelines and Secondary Meta-Analysis for the Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders.

Authors:  Felipe Fregni; Mirret M El-Hagrassy; Kevin Pacheco-Barrios; Sandra Carvalho; Jorge Leite; Marcel Simis; Jerome Brunelin; Ester Miyuki Nakamura-Palacios; Paola Marangolo; Ganesan Venkatasubramanian; Daniel San-Juan; Wolnei Caumo; Marom Bikson; André R Brunoni
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 5.176

Review 9.  Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain.

Authors:  Neil E O'Connell; Louise Marston; Sally Spencer; Lorraine H DeSouza; Benedict M Wand
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-03-16

10.  Neuroplastic Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Painful Symptoms Reduction in Chronic Hepatitis C: A Phase II Randomized, Double Blind, Sham Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Aline P Brietzke; Joanna R Rozisky; Jairo A Dussan-Sarria; Alicia Deitos; Gabriela Laste; Priscila F T Hoppe; Suzana Muller; Iraci L S Torres; Mário R Alvares-da-Silva; Rivadavio F B de Amorim; Felipe Fregni; Wolnei Caumo
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.