Literature DB >> 16002441

Modulating parameters of excitability during and after transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex.

Michael A Nitsche1, Antje Seeber, Kai Frommann, Cornelia Carmen Klein, Christian Rochford, Maren S Nitsche, Kristina Fricke, David Liebetanz, Nicolas Lang, Andrea Antal, Walter Paulus, Frithjof Tergau.   

Abstract

Weak transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the human motor cortex results in excitability shifts which occur during and after stimulation. These excitability shifts are polarity-specific with anodal tDCS enhancing excitability, and cathodal reducing it. To explore the origin of this excitability modulation in more detail, we measured the input-output curve and motor thresholds as global parameters of cortico-spinal excitability, and determined intracortical inhibition and facilitation, as well as facilitatory indirect wave (I-wave) interactions. Measurements were performed during short-term tDCS, which elicits no after-effects, and during other tDCS protocols which do elicit short- and long-lasting after-effects. Resting and active motor thresholds remained stable during and after tDCS. The slope of the input-output curve was increased by anodal tDCS and decreased by cathodal tDCS. Anodal tDCS of the primary motor cortex reduced intracortical inhibition and enhanced facilitation after tDCS but not during tDCS. Cathodal tDCS reduced facilitation during, and additionally increased inhibition after its administration. During tDCS, I-wave facilitation was not influenced but, for the after-effects, anodal tDCS increased I-wave facilitation, while cathodal tDCS had only minor effects. These results suggest that the effect of tDCS on cortico-spinal excitability during a short period of stimulation (which does not induce after-effects) primarily depends on subthreshold resting membrane potential changes, which are able to modulate the input-output curve, but not motor thresholds. In contrast, the after-effects of tDCS are due to shifts in intracortical inhibition and facilitation, and at least partly also to facilitatory I-wave interaction, which is controlled by synaptic activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16002441      PMCID: PMC1474757          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.092429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  27 in total

1.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  M A Nitsche; W Paulus
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Level of action of cathodal DC polarisation induced inhibition of the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Michael A Nitsche; Maren S Nitsche; Cornelia C Klein; Frithjof Tergau; John C Rothwell; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 3.  Clinical and research methods for evaluating cortical excitability.

Authors:  Giovanni Abbruzzese; Carlo Trompetto
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.177

4.  Mechanisms of enhancement of human motor cortex excitability induced by interventional paired associative stimulation.

Authors:  Katja Stefan; Erwin Kunesch; Reiner Benecke; Leonardo G Cohen; Joseph Classen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans.

Authors:  M A Nitsche; W Paulus
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-11-27       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 6.  Studies of human motor physiology with transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  R Chen
Journal:  Muscle Nerve Suppl       Date:  2000

7.  Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke.

Authors:  Friedhelm Hummel; Pablo Celnik; Pascal Giraux; Agnes Floel; Wan-Hsun Wu; Christian Gerloff; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2005-01-05       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  High-dose ketamine hydrochloride maintains somatosensory and magnetic motor evoked potentials in primates.

Authors:  R F Ghaly; J H Ham; J J Lee
Journal:  Neurol Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.448

9.  Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability.

Authors:  David Liebetanz; Michael A Nitsche; Frithjof Tergau; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Ketamine increases human motor cortex excitability to transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  V Di Lazzaro; A Oliviero; P Profice; M A Pennisi; F Pilato; G Zito; M Dileone; R Nicoletti; P Pasqualetti; P A Tonali
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-01-17       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  216 in total

1.  Contralesional hemisphere control of the proximal paretic upper limb following stroke.

Authors:  Lynley V Bradnam; Cathy M Stinear; P Alan Barber; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  What are we measuring with GABA magnetic resonance spectroscopy?

Authors:  Charlotte J Stagg; Velicia Bachtiar; Heidi Johansen-Berg
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2011-09-01

3.  Transcranial direct-current stimulation modulates synaptic mechanisms involved in associative learning in behaving rabbits.

Authors:  Javier Márquez-Ruiz; Rocío Leal-Campanario; Raudel Sánchez-Campusano; Behnam Molaee-Ardekani; Fabrice Wendling; Pedro C Miranda; Giulio Ruffini; Agnès Gruart; José María Delgado-García
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The role of the right parietal lobe in the perception of causality: a tDCS study.

Authors:  Benjamin Straube; David Wolk; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Brain stimulation for the treatment of pain: A review of costs, clinical effects, and mechanisms of treatment for three different central neuromodulatory approaches.

Authors:  Soroush Zaghi; Nikolas Heine; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  J Pain Manag       Date:  2009-08

6.  Efficacy of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for the treatment of fibromyalgia: results of a randomized, sham-controlled longitudinal clinical trial.

Authors:  Angela Valle; Suely Roizenblatt; Sueli Botte; Soroush Zaghi; Marcelo Riberto; Sergio Tufik; Paulo S Boggio; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  J Pain Manag       Date:  2009

Review 7.  Neuromodulation interventions for addictive disorders: challenges, promise, and roadmap for future research.

Authors:  Primavera A Spagnolo; David Goldman
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on the auditory mismatch negativity response and working memory performance in schizophrenia: a pilot study.

Authors:  Danielle Impey; Ashley Baddeley; Renee Nelson; Alain Labelle; Verner Knott
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.575

9.  Brain-machine interfaces and transcranial stimulation: future implications for directing functional movement and improving function after spinal injury in humans.

Authors:  Jose M Carmena; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2012

10.  Bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation enhances effector-independent representations of motor synergy and sequence learning.

Authors:  Sheena Waters-Metenier; Masud Husain; Tobias Wiestler; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.