Literature DB >> 20207481

Research design considerations for confirmatory chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations.

Robert H Dworkin1, Dennis C Turk, Sarah Peirce-Sandner, Ralf Baron, Nicholas Bellamy, Laurie B Burke, Amy Chappell, Kevin Chartier, Charles S Cleeland, Ann Costello, Penney Cowan, Rozalina Dimitrova, Susan Ellenberg, John T Farrar, Jacqueline A French, Ian Gilron, Sharon Hertz, Alejandro R Jadad, Gary W Jay, Jarkko Kalliomäki, Nathaniel P Katz, Robert D Kerns, Donald C Manning, Michael P McDermott, Patrick J McGrath, Arvind Narayana, Linda Porter, Steve Quessy, Bob A Rappaport, Christine Rauschkolb, Bryce B Reeve, Thomas Rhodes, Cristina Sampaio, David M Simpson, Joseph W Stauffer, Gerold Stucki, Jeffrey Tobias, Richard E White, James Witter.   

Abstract

There has been an increase in the number of chronic pain clinical trials in which the treatments being evaluated did not differ significantly from placebo in the primary efficacy analyses despite previous research suggesting that efficacy could be expected. These findings could reflect a true lack of efficacy or methodological and other aspects of these trials that compromise the demonstration of efficacy. There is substantial variability among chronic pain clinical trials with respect to important research design considerations, and identifying and addressing any methodological weaknesses would enhance the likelihood of demonstrating the analgesic effects of new interventions. An IMMPACT consensus meeting was therefore convened to identify the critical research design considerations for confirmatory chronic pain trials and to make recommendations for their conduct. We present recommendations for the major components of confirmatory chronic pain clinical trials, including participant selection, trial phases and duration, treatment groups and dosing regimens, and types of trials. Increased attention to and research on the methodological aspects of confirmatory chronic pain clinical trials has the potential to enhance their assay sensitivity and ultimately provide more meaningful evaluations of treatments for chronic pain. Copyright 2010 International Association for the Study of Pain. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20207481     DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.02.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  106 in total

Review 1.  Combination pharmacotherapy for the treatment of neuropathic pain in adults.

Authors:  Luis Enrique Chaparro; Philip J Wiffen; R Andrew Moore; Ian Gilron
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-07-11

2.  Overcoming obstacles to developing new analgesics.

Authors:  Clifford J Woolf
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 3.  Chronic pain assessment from bench to bedside: lessons along the translation continuum.

Authors:  Bryan Jensen
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 4.  A review of the evidence regarding associations between attachment theory and experimentally induced pain.

Authors:  Pamela Joy Meredith
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2013-04

5.  IMPROVE trial: a randomized controlled trial of patient-controlled analgesia for sickle cell painful episodes: rationale, design challenges, initial experience, and recommendations for future studies.

Authors:  Carlton D Dampier; Wally R Smith; Carrie G Wager; Hae-Young Kim; Margaret C Bell; Scott T Miller; Debra L Weiner; Caterina P Minniti; Lakshmanan Krishnamurti; Kenneth I Ataga; James R Eckman; Lewis L Hsu; Donna McClish; Sonja M McKinlay; Robert Molokie; Ifeyinwa Osunkwo; Kim Smith-Whitley; Marilyn J Telen
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 6.  Medical and psychological risks and consequences of long-term opioid therapy in women.

Authors:  Beth D Darnall; Brett R Stacey; Roger Chou
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 3.750

7.  Treating intractable phantom limb pain with ambulatory continuous peripheral nerve blocks: a pilot study.

Authors:  Brian M Ilfeld; Tobias Moeller-Bertram; Steven R Hanling; Kyle Tokarz; Edward R Mariano; Vanessa J Loland; Sarah J Madison; Eliza J Ferguson; Anya C Morgan; Mark S Wallace
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 3.750

8.  Pregabalin for Neuropathic Pain: Why Benefits Could Be Expected for Multiple Pain Conditions.

Authors:  Setsuro Ogawa; Akio Arakawa; Kazuhiro Hayakawa; Tamotsu Yoshiyama
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 9.  Clinical experience with duloxetine in the management of chronic musculoskeletal pain. A focus on osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  Jacques P Brown; Luc J Boulay
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.346

Review 10.  Local anaesthetic sympathetic blockade for complex regional pain syndrome.

Authors:  Neil E O'Connell; Benedict M Wand; William Gibson; Daniel B Carr; Frank Birklein; Tasha R Stanton
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-07-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.