Literature DB >> 10534598

Electrical stimulation of motor cortex for pain control: a combined PET-scan and electrophysiological study.

L García-Larrea1, R Peyron, P Mertens, M C Gregoire, F Lavenne, D Le Bars, P Convers, F Mauguière, M Sindou, B Laurent.   

Abstract

Although electrical stimulation of the precentral gyrus (MCS) is emerging as a promising technique for pain control, its mechanisms of action remain obscure, and its application largely empirical. Using positron emission tomography (PET) we studied regional changes in cerebral flood flow (rCBF) in 10 patients undergoing motor cortex stimulation for pain control, seven of whom also underwent somatosensory evoked potentials and nociceptive spinal reflex recordings. The most significant MCS-related increase in rCBF concerned the ventral-lateral thalamus, probably reflecting cortico-thalamic connections from motor areas. CBF increases were also observed in medial thalamus, anterior cingulate/orbitofrontal cortex, anterior insula and upper brainstem; conversely, no significant CBF changes appeared in motor areas beneath the stimulating electrode. Somatosensory evoked potentials from SI remained stable during MCS, and no rCBF changes were observed in somatosensory cortex during the procedure. Our results suggest that descending axons, rather than apical dendrites, are primarily activated by MCS, and highlight the thalamus as the key structure mediating functional MCS effects. A model of MCS action is proposed, whereby activation of thalamic nuclei directly connected with motor and premotor cortices would entail a cascade of synaptic events in pain-related structures receiving afferents from these nuclei, including the medial thalamus, anterior cingulate and upper brainstem. MCS could influence the affective-emotional component of chronic pain by way of cingulate/orbitofrontal activation, and lead to descending inhibition of pain impulses by activation of the brainstem, also suggested by attenuation of spinal flexion reflexes. In contrast, the hypothesis of somatosensory cortex activation by MCS could not be confirmed by our results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10534598     DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00114-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  95 in total

1.  In vivo microstimulation with cathodic and anodic asymmetric waveforms modulates spatiotemporal calcium dynamics in cortical neuropil and pyramidal neurons of male mice.

Authors:  Kevin C Stieger; James R Eles; Kip A Ludwig; Takashi D Y Kozai
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 4.164

Review 2.  Invasive brain stimulation for the treatment of neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Nguyen; Julien Nizard; Yves Keravel; Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 3.  Developing an optimized strategy with transcranial direct current stimulation to enhance the endogenous pain control system in fibromyalgia.

Authors:  Dante Duarte; Luis Eduardo Coutinho Castelo-Branco; Elif Uygur Kucukseymen; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.166

4.  Functional interaction between medial thalamus and rostral anterior cingulate cortex in the suppression of pain affect.

Authors:  S E Harte; C A Spuz; G S Borszcz
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  Modelling motor cortex stimulation for chronic pain control: electrical potential field, activating functions and responses of simple nerve fibre models.

Authors:  L Manola; B H Roelofsen; J Holsheimer; E Marani; J Geelen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Treatment of cancer pain with noninvasive brain stimulation.

Authors:  Gisele Silva; Rebecca Miksad; Steven D Freedman; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Sanjay Jain; Daniela L Gomes; Edson J Amancio; Paulo S Boggio; Claudio F Correa; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.612

Review 7.  Motor Cortex Stimulation for Deafferentation Pain.

Authors:  Ahmed E Hussein; Darian R Esfahani; Galina I Moisak; Jamil A Rzaev; Konstantin V Slavin
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2018-05-23

8.  Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Astrocytes Proliferation and nNOS Expression in Neuropathic Pain Rats.

Authors:  Lu Yang; Sai-Hua Wang; Yan Hu; Yan-Fang Sui; Tao Peng; Tie-Cheng Guo
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2018-06-22

Review 9.  Invasive and non-invasive brain stimulation for treatment of neuropathic pain in patients with spinal cord injury: a review.

Authors:  Raffaele Nardone; Yvonne Höller; Stefan Leis; Peter Höller; Natasha Thon; Aljoscha Thomschewski; Stefan Golaszewski; Francesco Brigo; Eugen Trinka
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 1.985

10.  Motor cortex stimulation suppresses cortical responses to noxious hindpaw stimulation after spinal cord lesion in rats.

Authors:  Li Jiang; Yadong Ji; Pamela J Voulalas; Michael Keaser; Su Xu; Rao P Gullapalli; Joel Greenspan; Radi Masri
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 8.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.