Literature DB >> 25361821

Attending to items in working memory: evidence that refreshing and memory search are closely related.

Evie Vergauwe1, Nelson Cowan.   

Abstract

Refreshing refers to the use of attention to reactivate items in working memory (WM). In the present study, we aimed to test the hypothesis that refreshing is closely related to memory search. The assumption is that refreshing and memory search both rely on a basic covert memory process that quickly retrieves the memory items into the focus of attention, thereby reactivating the information (Cowan, 1992; Vergauwe & Cowan, 2014). Consistent with the idea that people use their attention to prevent loss from WM, previous research has shown that increasing the proportion of time during which attention is occupied by concurrent processing, thereby preventing refreshing, results in poorer recall performance in complex span tasks (Barrouillet, Portrat, & Camos, Psychological Review, 118, 175-192, 2011). Here, we tested whether recall performance is differentially affected by prolonged attentional capture caused by memory search. If memory search and refreshing both rely on retrieval from WM, then prolonged attentional capture caused by memory search should not lead to forgetting, because memory items are assumed to be reactivated during memory search, in the same way that they would be if that period of time were used for refreshing. Consistent with this idea, prolonged attentional capture had a disruptive effect when it was caused by the need to retrieve knowledge from long-term memory, but not when it was caused by the need to search through the content of WM. The present results support the idea that refreshing operates through a process of retrieval of information into the focus of attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25361821      PMCID: PMC4417097          DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0755-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  17 in total

1.  Temporal-contextual processing in working memory: evidence from delayed cued recall and delayed free recall tests.

Authors:  Vanessa M Loaiza; David P McCabe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-02

2.  Do mental processes share a domain-general resource?

Authors:  Evie Vergauwe; Pierre Barrouillet; Valérie Camos
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-02-04

3.  The effects of processing time and processing rate on forgetting in working memory: testing four models of the complex span paradigm.

Authors:  Annekatrin Hudjetz; Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-10

4.  Time and cognitive load in working memory.

Authors:  Pierre Barrouillet; Sophie Bernardin; Sophie Portrat; Evie Vergauwe; Valérie Camos
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 5.  Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide.

Authors:  Andrew R A Conway; Michael J Kane; Michael F Bunting; D Zach Hambrick; Oliver Wilhelm; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-10

6.  Two separate verbal processing rates contributing to short-term memory span.

Authors:  N Cowan; N L Wood; P K Wood; T A Keller; L D Nugent; C V Keller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1998-06

7.  On the law relating processing to storage in working memory.

Authors:  Pierre Barrouillet; Sophie Portrat; Valérie Camos
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  How does processing affect storage in working memory tasks? Evidence for both domain-general and domain-specific effects.

Authors:  Christopher Jarrold; Helen Tam; Alan D Baddeley; Caroline E Harvey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  The impact of storage on processing: how is information maintained in working memory?

Authors:  Evie Vergauwe; Valérie Camos; Pierre Barrouillet
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  A common short-term memory retrieval rate may describe many cognitive procedures.

Authors:  Evie Vergauwe; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  15 in total

1.  The importance of working memory updating in the Prisoner's dilemma.

Authors:  Alexander Soutschek; Torsten Schubert
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-02-18

2.  What is the time course of working memory attentional refreshing?

Authors:  Benoît Lemaire; Aurore Pageot; Gaën Plancher; Sophie Portrat
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-02

3.  What happens to an individual visual working memory representation when it is interrupted?

Authors:  Gi-Yeul Bae; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2018-08-01

4.  Using effective connectivity analyses to understand processing architecture: Response to commentaries by Samuel, Spivey and McQueen, Eisner and Norris.

Authors:  David W Gow; Bruna B Olson
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 2.331

5.  On some of the main criticisms of the modal model: Reappraisal from a TBRS perspective.

Authors:  Gaën Plancher; Pierre Barrouillet
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-04

6.  What do people typically do between list items? The nature of attention-based mnemonic activities depends on task context.

Authors:  Evie Vergauwe; Timothy J Ricker; Naomi Langerock; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Searching for serial refreshing in working memory: Using response times to track the content of the focus of attention over time.

Authors:  Evie Vergauwe; Kyle O Hardman; Jeffrey N Rouder; Emily Roemer; Sara McAllaster; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-12

8.  Evidence for spontaneous serial refreshing in verbal working memory?

Authors:  Evie Vergauwe; Naomi Langerock; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-04

9.  Dissociating rehearsal and refreshing in the maintenance of verbal information in 8-year-old children.

Authors:  Gérome Mora; Valérie Camos
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-01-23

Review 10.  Attentional and non-attentional systems in the maintenance of verbal information in working memory: the executive and phonological loops.

Authors:  Valérie Camos; Pierre Barrouillet
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.