Literature DB >> 17470006

Time and cognitive load in working memory.

Pierre Barrouillet1, Sophie Bernardin, Sophie Portrat, Evie Vergauwe, Valérie Camos.   

Abstract

According to the time-based resource-sharing model (P. Barrouillet, S. Bernardin, & V. Camos, 2004), the cognitive load a given task involves is a function of the proportion of time during which it captures attention, thus impeding other attention-demanding processes. Accordingly, the present study demonstrates that the disruptive effect on concurrent maintenance of memory retrievals and response selections increases with their duration. Moreover, the effect on recall performance of concurrent activities does not go beyond their duration insofar as the processes are attention demanding. Finally, these effects are not modality specific, as spatial processing was found to disrupt verbal maintenance. These results suggest a sequential and time-based function of working memory in which processing and storage rely on a single and general purpose attentional resource needed to run executive processes devoted to constructing, maintaining, and modifying ephemeral representations.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17470006     DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  98 in total

1.  Attending to items in working memory: evidence that refreshing and memory search are closely related.

Authors:  Evie Vergauwe; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-08

Review 2.  The focus of attention as observed in visual working memory tasks: making sense of competing claims.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Time causes forgetting from working memory.

Authors:  Pierre Barrouillet; Annick De Paepe; Naomi Langerock
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-02

4.  Temporal-contextual processing in working memory: evidence from delayed cued recall and delayed free recall tests.

Authors:  Vanessa M Loaiza; David P McCabe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-02

Review 5.  Modeling working memory: an interference model of complex span.

Authors:  Klaus Oberauer; Stephan Lewandowsky; Simon Farrell; Christopher Jarrold; Martin Greaves
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

6.  The nature and position of processing determines why forgetting occurs in working memory tasks.

Authors:  Christopher Jarrold; Helen Tam; Alan D Baddeley; Caroline E Harvey
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-12

7.  Early use of magnetic endoscopic imaging by novice colonoscopists: improved performance without increase in workload.

Authors:  Sylvain Coderre; John Anderson; Remy Rikers; Paul Dunckley; Karen Holbrook; Kevin McLaughlin
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.522

8.  Temporal isolation effects in recognition and serial recall.

Authors:  Caroline Morin; Gordon D A Brown; Stephan Lewandowsky
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-10

Review 9.  Multiple concurrent thoughts: The meaning and developmental neuropsychology of working memory.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.253

10.  Working memory in children with cochlear implants: problems are in storage, not processing.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Amanda Caldwell-Tarr; Joanna H Lowenstein
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 1.675

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.