Literature DB >> 24564542

The impact of storage on processing: how is information maintained in working memory?

Evie Vergauwe1, Valérie Camos2, Pierre Barrouillet3.   

Abstract

Working memory is typically defined as a system devoted to the simultaneous maintenance and processing of information. However, the interplay between these 2 functions is still a matter of debate in the literature, with views ranging from complete independence to complete dependence. The time-based resource-sharing model assumes that a central bottleneck constrains the 2 functions to alternate in such a way that maintenance activities postpone concurrent processing, with each additional piece of information to be maintained resulting in an additional postponement. Using different kinds of memoranda, we examined in a series of 7 experiments the effect of increasing memory load on different processing tasks. The results reveal that, insofar as attention is needed for maintenance, processing times linearly increase at a rate of about 50 ms per verbal or visuospatial memory item, suggesting a very fast refresh rate in working memory. Our results also show an asymmetry between verbal and spatial information, in that spatial information can solely rely on attention for its maintenance while verbal information can also rely on a domain-specific maintenance mechanism independent from attention. The implications for the functioning of working memory are discussed, with a specific focus on how information is maintained in working memory. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24564542     DOI: 10.1037/a0035779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  32 in total

1.  Attending to items in working memory: evidence that refreshing and memory search are closely related.

Authors:  Evie Vergauwe; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-08

2.  What is the time course of working memory attentional refreshing?

Authors:  Benoît Lemaire; Aurore Pageot; Gaën Plancher; Sophie Portrat
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-02

3.  Do familiar memory items decay?

Authors:  Timothy J Ricker; Joshua Sandry; Evie Vergauwe; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Central and peripheral components of working memory storage.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan; J Scott Saults; Christopher L Blume
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2014-05-26

5.  Categorical working memory representations are used in delayed estimation of continuous colors.

Authors:  Kyle O Hardman; Evie Vergauwe; Timothy J Ricker
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  On some of the main criticisms of the modal model: Reappraisal from a TBRS perspective.

Authors:  Gaën Plancher; Pierre Barrouillet
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-04

7.  What do people typically do between list items? The nature of attention-based mnemonic activities depends on task context.

Authors:  Evie Vergauwe; Timothy J Ricker; Naomi Langerock; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Development of the ability to combine visual and acoustic information in working memory.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan; Yu Li; Bret A Glass; J Scott Saults
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2017-11-08

9.  Searching for serial refreshing in working memory: Using response times to track the content of the focus of attention over time.

Authors:  Evie Vergauwe; Kyle O Hardman; Jeffrey N Rouder; Emily Roemer; Sara McAllaster; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-12

10.  Working memory still needs verbal rehearsal.

Authors:  Annalisa Lucidi; Naomi Langerock; Violette Hoareau; Benoît Lemaire; Valérie Camos; Pierre Barrouillet
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.