Literature DB >> 30024250

What do people typically do between list items? The nature of attention-based mnemonic activities depends on task context.

Evie Vergauwe1, Timothy J Ricker2, Naomi Langerock1, Nelson Cowan3.   

Abstract

It is commonly assumed that attention-demanding postencoding processes take place during the free time immediately following encoding of each memory item in a list. These processes are thought to prevent loss of information from working memory (WM). We tested whether interitem pauses during presentation of a list are used to focus attention (a) on the last-presented memory item or (b) on all items currently in WM, and (c) whether this changes over time. Here, we presented black probe letters between to-be-remembered red letters. Participants judged whether each probe letter corresponded to the last-presented memory item (last-item match group) or to any of the memory items presented up to that point in the list (any-item match group). To examine mnemonic processing as a function of time, the delay between the to-be-remembered letter and the following probe was manipulated in three experiments. When preprobe delays and interitem intervals were relatively short (Experiment 1), recall performance was observed to be better in the last-item match group and this did not change as a function of the duration of the delay before the probe. When preprobe delays and interitem intervals were longer however (Experiment 2), this disruptive effect of Any-item match instructions was no longer observed. This pattern was found again in Experiment 3 and suggests that the nature of the attention-demanding postencoding processes taking place in between memory items depends on task context in a systematic manner. The results are discussed in terms of previously proposed attention-demanding processes; specifically, consolidation and refreshing. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30024250      PMCID: PMC6339608          DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  33 in total

1.  Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: a latent-variable approach.

Authors:  Randall W Engle; Stephen W Tuholski; James E Laughlin; Andrew R A Conway
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1999-09

2.  Do mental processes share a domain-general resource?

Authors:  Evie Vergauwe; Pierre Barrouillet; Valérie Camos
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-02-04

3.  Refreshing one of several active representations: behavioral and functional magnetic resonance imaging differences between young and older adults.

Authors:  Carol L Raye; Karen J Mitchell; John A Reeder; Erich J Greene; Marcia K Johnson
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Too much control can hurt: a threaded cognition model of the attentional blink.

Authors:  Niels A Taatgen; Ion Juvina; Marc Schipper; Jelmer P Borst; Sander Martens
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Forgetting in immediate serial recall: decay, temporal distinctiveness, or interference?

Authors:  Klaus Oberauer; Stephan Lewandowsky
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Interference: unique source of forgetting in working memory?

Authors:  Pierre Barrouillet; Valérie Camos
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Neuroimaging a single thought: dorsolateral PFC activity associated with refreshing just-activated information.

Authors:  Carol L Raye; Marcia K Johnson; Karen J Mitchell; John A Reeder; Erich J Greene
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Loss of visual working memory within seconds: the combined use of refreshable and non-refreshable features.

Authors:  Timothy J Ricker; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  The consequence of refreshing for access to nonselected items in young and older adults.

Authors:  Julie A Higgins; Marcia K Johnson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-03

10.  How verbal memory loads consume attention.

Authors:  Zhijian Chen; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.