Literature DB >> 21319919

How does processing affect storage in working memory tasks? Evidence for both domain-general and domain-specific effects.

Christopher Jarrold1, Helen Tam, Alan D Baddeley, Caroline E Harvey.   

Abstract

Two studies that examine whether the forgetting caused by the processing demands of working memory tasks is domain-general or domain-specific are presented. In each, separate groups of adult participants were asked to carry out either verbal or nonverbal operations on exactly the same processing materials while maintaining verbal storage items. The imposition of verbal processing tended to produce greater forgetting even though verbal processing operations took no longer to complete than did nonverbal processing operations. However, nonverbal processing did cause forgetting relative to baseline control conditions, and evidence from the timing of individuals' processing responses suggests that individuals in both processing groups slowed their responses in order to "refresh" the memoranda. Taken together the data suggest that processing has a domain-general effect on working memory performance by impeding refreshment of memoranda but can also cause effects that appear domain-specific and that result from either blocking of rehearsal or interference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21319919     DOI: 10.1037/a0022527

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  15 in total

1.  Attending to items in working memory: evidence that refreshing and memory search are closely related.

Authors:  Evie Vergauwe; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-08

Review 2.  Modeling working memory: an interference model of complex span.

Authors:  Klaus Oberauer; Stephan Lewandowsky; Simon Farrell; Christopher Jarrold; Martin Greaves
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

3.  What is the time course of working memory attentional refreshing?

Authors:  Benoît Lemaire; Aurore Pageot; Gaën Plancher; Sophie Portrat
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-02

4.  Boundary conditions for observing cognitive load effects in visual working memory.

Authors:  Timothy J Ricker; Evie Vergauwe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-05-03

5.  Visual short-term memory always requires general attention.

Authors:  Candice C Morey; Malte Bieler
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-02

6.  The effects of environmental support and secondary tasks on visuospatial working memory.

Authors:  Lindsey Lilienthal; Sandra Hale; Joel Myerson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-10

7.  Storage and processing in working memory: Assessing dual-task performance and task prioritization across the adult lifespan.

Authors:  Stephen Rhodes; Agnieszka J Jaroslawska; Jason M Doherty; Clément Belletier; Moshe Naveh-Benjamin; Nelson Cowan; Valérie Camos; Pierre Barrouillet; Robert H Logie
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2019-01-21

Review 8.  Can we distinguish three maintenance processes in working memory?

Authors:  Candice C Morey; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  The development of memory maintenance strategies: training cumulative rehearsal and interactive imagery in children aged between 5 and 9.

Authors:  Sadie Miller; Samantha McCulloch; Christopher Jarrold
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-01

10.  A common short-term memory retrieval rate may describe many cognitive procedures.

Authors:  Evie Vergauwe; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.