Literature DB >> 25361648

Development of a virtual reality robotic surgical curriculum using the da Vinci Si surgical system.

Pedro Pablo Gomez1, Ross E Willis, Kent R Van Sickle.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to develop a training curriculum to evaluate the basic robotic skills necessary to reach an 80 % preset proficiency score and correlate the level of surgical experience with the overall performance obtained using the da Vinci Surgical Skills simulator.
METHODS: Twenty-two participants (4 faculty, 4 senior, and 14 junior residents) were enrolled in a 4-week robotic training curriculum developed at our institution. A set of seven robotic skills were selected based on the manufacturer's exercise primary endpoint. During their pretesting session, participants completed one trial of each of the seven simulated exercises. In two individual sessions over a 2 week period, trainees practiced a different set of exercises that evaluated the same basic robotic skills assessed during pretesting with the objective of reaching an overall score of 80 % on two consecutive attempts. If proficiency was not achieved, then a maximum of six trials per exercise was allowed before advancing to the next skill. During their fourth week of training, participants completed a post-testing session with the same set of exercises used during pretesting. Participants' overall performance and various metrics were recorded in an online database for further analysis.
RESULTS: A significant skills gain from pre- to post-test was observed for each of the seven basic robotic skills regardless of participant's level of training (p < .001). Interestingly, participants only achieved an overall score of 80 % or more in only five of the seven exercises. No statistical difference in gain of skills was found between groups suggesting robotic skills development is independent of level of prior surgical expertise.
CONCLUSION: A dedicated virtual reality robotic training curriculum significantly improves the seven basic robotic surgical skills necessary to operate the da Vinci Si surgical console. Six training trials appear to be insufficient to reach proficiency levels on more advanced skills.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25361648     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3914-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  20 in total

1.  Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Gerald M Fried; Liane S Feldman; Melina C Vassiliou; Shannon A Fraser; Donna Stanbridge; Gabriela Ghitulescu; Christopher G Andrew
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Comparing three pedagogical approaches to psychomotor skills acquisition.

Authors:  Ross E Willis; Jacqueline Richa; Richard Oppeltz; Patrick Nguyen; Kelly Wagner; Kent R Van Sickle; Daniel L Dent
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Global evaluative assessment of robotic skills: validation of a clinical assessment tool to measure robotic surgical skills.

Authors:  Alvin C Goh; David W Goldfarb; James C Sander; Brian J Miles; Brian J Dunkin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Content and face validity of a comprehensive robotic skills training program for general surgery, urology, and gynecology.

Authors:  Genevieve Dulan; Robert V Rege; Deborah C Hogg; Kristine K Gilberg-Fisher; Seifu T Tesfay; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Current status of robotic surgery.

Authors:  Subhasis Giri; Diptendra K Sarkar
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 0.656

6.  Can we become better robot surgeons through simulator practice?

Authors:  Ankit Patel; Meghna Patel; Nathaniel Lytle; Juan P Toro; Rachel L Medbery; Sheryl Bluestein; Sebastian D Perez; John F Sweeney; S Scott Davis; Edward Lin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Robotic surgery.

Authors:  Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.741

8.  Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  A M Derossis; G M Fried; M Abrahamowicz; H H Sigman; J S Barkun; J L Meakins
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Developing a comprehensive, proficiency-based training program for robotic surgery.

Authors:  Genevieve Dulan; Robert V Rege; Deborah C Hogg; Kristine M Gilberg-Fisher; Nabeel A Arain; Seifu T Tesfay; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  da Vinci Skills Simulator construct validation study: correlation of prior robotic experience with overall score and time score simulator performance.

Authors:  Kyle T Finnegan; Anoop M Meraney; Ilene Staff; Steven J Shichman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Current state of virtual reality simulation in robotic surgery training: a review.

Authors:  Justin D Bric; Derek C Lumbard; Matthew J Frelich; Jon C Gould
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  An appraisal of the learning curve in robotic general surgery.

Authors:  Luise I M Pernar; Faith C Robertson; Ali Tavakkoli; Eric G Sheu; David C Brooks; Douglas S Smink
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Evaluation of different time schedules in training with the Da Vinci simulator.

Authors:  C Güldner; A Orth; P Dworschak; I Diogo; M Mandapathil; A Teymoortash; U Walliczek-Dworschak
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  The effect of different training exercises on the performance outcome on the da Vinci Skills Simulator.

Authors:  U Walliczek-Dworschak; M Schmitt; P Dworschak; I Diogo; A Ecke; M Mandapathil; A Teymoortash; C Güldner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  What happens while learning robotic lobectomy for lung cancer?

Authors:  Mehmet Oğuzhan Özyurtkan; Erkan Kaba; Alper Toker
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-03-10

6.  Robotic skills can be aided by laparoscopic training.

Authors:  Daniel G Davila; Melissa C Helm; Matthew J Frelich; Jon C Gould; Matthew I Goldblatt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  General surgery training and robotics: Are residents improving their skills?

Authors:  Brendan M Finnerty; Cheguevara Afaneh; Anna Aronova; Thomas J Fahey; Rasa Zarnegar
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Does previous open surgical experience have any influence on robotic surgery simulation exercises?

Authors:  Alin Adrian Cumpanas; Razvan Bardan; Ovidiu Catalin Ferician; Silviu Constantin Latcu; Ciprian Duta; Fulger Octavian Lazar
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 1.195

Review 9.  Systematic review of learning curves in robot-assisted surgery.

Authors:  N A Soomro; D A Hashimoto; A J Porteous; C J A Ridley; W J Marsh; R Ditto; S Roy
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2019-11-29

10.  Effective implementation and adaptation of structured robotic colorectal programme in a busy tertiary unit.

Authors:  A Thomas; K Altaf; D Sochorova; U Gur; A Parvaiz; Shakil Ahmed
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-11-03
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.