Literature DB >> 18790158

Robotic surgery.

Dmitry Oleynikov1.   

Abstract

This article discusses the developments that led up to robotic surgical systems as well as what is on the horizon for new robotic technology. Topics include how robotics is enabling new types of procedures, including natural orifice endoscopic translumenal surgery in which one cannot reach by hand under any circumstances, and how these developments will drive the next generation of robots.

Mesh：

Year:  2008        PMID： 18790158     DOI： 10.1016/j.suc.2008.05.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Clin North Am        ISSN： 0039-6109            Impact factor:   2.741


  15 in total

1.  Development of a virtual reality robotic surgical curriculum using the da Vinci Si surgical system.

Authors:  Pedro Pablo Gomez; Ross E Willis; Kent R Van Sickle
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  In vivo miniature robots for natural orifice surgery: State of the art and future perspectives.

Authors:  Manish M Tiwari; Jason F Reynoso; Amy C Lehman; Albert W Tsang; Shane M Farritor; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-06-27

3.  A multitasking platform for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): a benchtop comparison of a new device for flexible endoscopic surgery and a standard dual-channel endoscope.

Authors:  Georg O Spaun; Bin Zheng; Lee L Swanström
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Initial trial of a stereoscopic, insertable, remotely controlled camera for minimal access surgery.

Authors:  Dennis L Fowler; Tie Hu; Tejas Nadkarni; Peter K Allen; Nancy J Hogle
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Miniature in vivo robot for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery.

Authors:  Oleg Dolghi; Kyle W Strabala; Tyler D Wortman; Matthew R Goede; Shane M Farritor; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Natural orifice transgastric endoscopic wedge hepatic resection in an experimental model using an intuitively controlled master and slave transluminal endoscopic robot (MASTER).

Authors:  S J Phee; K Y Ho; D Lomanto; S C Low; V A Huynh; A P Kencana; K Yang; Z L Sun; S C Sydney Chung
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  A comparison of early learning curves for complex bimanual coordination with open, laparoscopic, and flexible endoscopic instrumentation.

Authors:  Georg O Spaun; Bin Zheng; Daniel V Martinec; Brittany N Arnold; Lee L Swanström
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison of short-term surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Weisong Shen; Hongqing Xi; Bo Wei; Jianxin Cui; Shibo Bian; Kecheng Zhang; Ning Wang; Xiaohui Huang; Lin Chen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  A meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Wei-Song Shen; Hong-Qing Xi; Lin Chen; Bo Wei
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Review of emerging surgical robotic technology.

Authors:  Brian S Peters; Priscila R Armijo; Crystal Krause; Songita A Choudhury; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 4.584
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.