Literature DB >> 25355912

Early structural valve deterioration of Mitroflow aortic bioprosthesis: mode, incidence, and impact on outcome in a large cohort of patients.

Thomas Sénage1, Thierry Le Tourneau1, Yohann Foucher1, Sabine Pattier1, Caroline Cueff1, Magali Michel1, Jean-Michel Serfaty1, Antoine Mugniot1, Christian Périgaud1, Hubert François Carton1, Ousama Al Habash1, Olivier Baron1, Jean Christian Roussel2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Structural valve deterioration (SVD) is a major flaw of bioprostheses. Early SVD has been suspected in the last models of Mitroflow bioprosthesis. We sought to assess the incidence, mode, and impact of SVD on outcome in a large series of Mitroflow aortic valve replacement. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Six hundred seventeen consecutive patients (aged 76.1±6.3 years) underwent aortic valve replacement with a Mitroflow prosthesis (models 12A/LX) between 2002 and 2007. By echocardiography, 39 patients developed early SVD (1.66% per patient-year), with stenosis as the main mode (n=36). Mean delay to SVD was only 3.8±1.4 years, and 5-year SVD-free survival was 91.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 88.7-94.7) for the whole cohort and 79.8% (95% CI, 71.2-89.4) and 94.0% (95% CI, 90.3-97.8) for 19- and 21-mm sizes, respectively. Among the 39 patients with SVD, 13 patients (33%) had an accelerated SVD once the mean gradient exceeded 30 mm Hg. Valve-related death was 46.2% in this SVD subgroup. Five-year overall survival was 69.6% (95% CI, 65.7-73.9). In multivariable analysis, SVD was the strongest correlate of overall mortality (hazard ratio=7.7; 95% CI, 4.4-13.6).
CONCLUSIONS: Early SVD is frequent in Mitroflow bioprosthesis (models 12A/LX), especially for small sizes (19 and 21 mm), and reduces overall survival. An unpredictable accelerated pattern of SVD constitutes a life-threatening condition. In view of the large number of Mitroflow valves implanted worldwide, one can expect an epidemic of SVD and valve-related deaths, which represents a major public health issue, especially in the elderly. Hence, a close follow-up with yearly echocardiography after Mitroflow implantation is advisable. An urgent reoperation should be discussed in patients with severe SVD even though they are still asymptomatic.
© 2014 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic stenosis; bioprosthesis; cardiac valves; echocardiography; survival analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25355912     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.010400

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  25 in total

Review 1.  Surgical Treatment of Valvular Heart Disease: Overview of Mechanical and Tissue Prostheses, Advantages, Disadvantages, and Implications for Clinical Use.

Authors:  Amy G Fiedler; George Tolis
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-02-05

2.  Early structural degeneration of Mitroflow aortic valve: another issue in addition to the mismatch?

Authors:  Giovanni Ruvolo; Calogera Pisano; Carmela Rita Balistreri; Emiliano Maresi; Oreste Fabio Triolo; Vincenzo Argano; Carlo Bassano; Sara Rita Vacirca; Paolo Nardi; Augusto Orlandi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Tissue Valve Degeneration and Mechanical Valve Failure.

Authors:  Andrew C W Baldwin; George Tolis
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2019-06-14

Review 4.  Biological aortic valve replacement: advantages and optimal indications of stentless compared to stented valve substitutes. A review.

Authors:  Reza Tavakoli; Pichoy Danial; Ahmed Hamid Oudjana; Peiman Jamshidi; Max Gassmann; Pascal Leprince; Guillaume Lebreton
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-01-10

5.  10-Year Impact of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Leaflet Design (Intra- Versus Supra-Annular) in Mortality and Hemodynamic Performance.

Authors:  Andrea Scotti; Luca Nai Fovino; Augustin Coisne; Tommaso Fabris; Francesco Cardaioli; Mauro Massussi; Giulio Rodinò; Alberto Barolo; Mauro Boiago; Saverio Continisio; Carolina Montonati; Tommaso Sciarretta; Vittorio Zuccarelli; Valentina Bernardini; Giulia Masiero; Massimo Napodano; Chiara Fraccaro; Alfredo Marchese; Giovanni Esposito; Juan F Granada; Azeem Latib; Sabino Iliceto; Giuseppe Tarantini
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-06-08

Review 6.  Mechanisms and Drug Therapies of Bioprosthetic Heart Valve Calcification.

Authors:  Shuyu Wen; Ying Zhou; Wai Yen Yim; Shijie Wang; Li Xu; Jiawei Shi; Weihua Qiao; Nianguo Dong
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 5.988

7.  Stent and leaflet stresses across generations of balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valves.

Authors:  Yue Xuan; Danny Dvir; Zhongjie Wang; Jian Ye; Julius M Guccione; Liang Ge; Elaine E Tseng
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2020-06-01

8.  Sudden cardiac arrest during emergency caesarean delivery in a 31-year-old woman, due to accelerated structural valve degeneration of an aortic valve bioprosthesis.

Authors:  Crochan John O'Sullivan; Eva Bühlmann Lerjen; Daniela Pellegrini; Franz Robert Eberli
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-11-13

9.  Structural valve deterioration after aortic valve replacement with the Trifecta valve.

Authors:  Paul Werner; Jasmin Gritsch; Sabine Scherzer; Christoph Gross; Marco Russo; Iuliana Coti; Alfred Kocher; Guenther Laufer; Martin Andreas
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-01-01

10.  Severe Aortic Regurgitation of Early Degenerated Mitroflow Bioprosthesis: From Echocardiographic Diagnosis to Treatment with Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Authors:  Matteo Pernigo; Marco Triggiani; Marianna Adamo; Gian Franco Pasini
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Echogr       Date:  2021-05-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.