| Literature DB >> 29404788 |
Amy G Fiedler1, George Tolis2.
Abstract
Valvular heart disease (VHD) affects a large number of patients annually. From a surgical standpoint, there are two primary options for valve replacement: mechanical or bioprosthetic. While there are clear advantages and disadvantages to either option, and recent literature does challenge some of the prior dictums of valve choice, a handful of absolutes remain true. Mechanical valves provide superior durability and freedom from re-operation when compared to their bioprosthetic counterparts, at the expense of bleeding or thrombotic complications associated with the need for lifelong oral anticoagulation. Unless a clear contraindication to oral anticoagulation exists, we recommend implanting mechanical valves for patients less than 60 years old and those who are older than 65 but maintained on anticoagulation for reasons other than their valvular disease. Bioprosthetic valves should be placed in patients who are greater than 65 years old or those patients who have a postoperative life expectancy of less than 10 years. Valve choice in patients between the ages of 60 to 70 is not dictated by guidelines and is less clear, with patient preference playing a larger role than their age range.Entities:
Keywords: Aortic valve replacement; Bioprosthetic heart valves; Mechanical heart valves; Mitral valve replacement; Valvular heart disease
Year: 2018 PMID: 29404788 DOI: 10.1007/s11936-018-0601-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 1092-8464