Literature DB >> 25350182

A double mobility acetabular implant for primary hip arthroplasty in patients at high risk of dislocation.

N L Vasukutty1, R G Middleton, P Young, C Uzoigwe, B Barkham, S Yusoff, T H A Minhas.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Dislocation following total hip replacement continues to be a problem for which no completely satisfactory solution has been found. Several methods have been proposed to reduce the incidence of hip dislocations with varying degrees of success, including elevated rim liners, constrained liners and large diameter bearings. We present our experience with the double mobility acetabular component in patients at high risk of instability.
METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 65 primary total hip arthroplasties in 55 patients (15 men, 40 women), performed between October 2005 and November 2009. The majority (80%) of patients had at least two and 26% had at least three risk factors for instability. The mean age was 76 years (range: 44-92 years). The patients were followed up for a mean duration of 60 months (range: 36-85 months).
RESULTS: Fourteen patients died and one was lost to follow-up, leaving fifty hips for final assessment. Until the final follow-up appointment, no patients had dislocation and none required revision surgery. The mean Oxford hip score improved from 45.0 to 26.5 (p<0.0001). The mean Merle d'Aubigné pain score improved from 1.4 to 4.9 (p<0.0001), the walking score from 2.3 to 3.1 (p<0.07) and the absolute hip function score from 5.4 to 10.8 (p<0.0001). There were no clinical or radiographic signs of loosening.
CONCLUSIONS: The double mobility acetabular component was successful at preventing dislocation during early to medium-term follow-up. However, as data are still lacking with regard to polyethylene wear rates at the additional bearing surface, it would be prudent to restrict the use of this implant to selected patients at high risk of instability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25350182      PMCID: PMC4474101          DOI: 10.1308/003588414X14055925058391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  42 in total

1.  Prevention of dislocation after hip arthroplasty: lessons from long-term followup.

Authors:  J J Callaghan; B E Heithoff; D D Goetz; P M Sullivan; D R Pedersen; R C Johnston
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Unstable total hip arthroplasty: detailed overview.

Authors:  D J Berry
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2001

3.  The double-mobility acetabular component in revision total hip replacement: the United Kingdom experience.

Authors:  N L Vasukutty; R G Middleton; E C Matthews; P S Young; C E Uzoigwe; T H A Minhas
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2012-05

4.  The use of a cemented dual mobility socket to treat recurrent dislocation.

Authors:  Moussa Hamadouche; David J Biau; Denis Huten; Thierry Musset; François Gaucher
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Do large heads enhance stability and restore native anatomy in primary total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  Adolph V Lombardi; Michael D Skeels; Keith R Berend; Joanne B Adams; Orlando J Franchi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Primary total hip arthroplasty with dual mobility socket to prevent dislocation: a 22-year follow-up of 240 hips.

Authors:  Bertrand Boyer; Rémi Philippot; Jean Geringer; Frédéric Farizon
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Failed internal fixation of femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  Sigurd Erik Hoelsbrekken; Jan-Henrik Opsahl; Morten Stiris; Øyvind Paulsrud; Knut Strømsøe
Journal:  Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen       Date:  2012-06-12

8.  Internal fixation versus total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures: a prospective randomized study of 100 hips.

Authors:  T Johansson; S A Jacobsson; I Ivarsson; A Knutsson; O Wahlström
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2000-12

9.  Fixation of intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck in young patients: risk factors for failure.

Authors:  A D Duckworth; S J Bennet; J Aderinto; J F Keating
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-06

10.  The dislocator, early and late: the role of large heads.

Authors:  Michael D Skeels; Keith R Berend; Adolph V Lombardi
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  5 in total

1.  Dual mobility cups provide biomechanical advantages in situations at risk for dislocation: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Alexandre Terrier; Adeliya Latypova; Maika Guillemin; Valérie Parvex; Olivier Guyen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Early intraprosthetic dislocation in dual-mobility implants: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ivan De Martino; Rocco D'Apolito; Bradford S Waddell; Alexander S McLawhorn; Peter K Sculco; Thomas P Sculco
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2017-02-05

3.  Advances in hip arthroplasty surgery: what is justified?

Authors:  Luigi Zagra
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2017-05-11

4.  Constrained liners, dual mobility or large diameter heads to avoid dislocation in THA.

Authors:  Olivier Guyen
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2017-03-13

5.  The Saturne cementless dual-mobility cup grants satisfactory long-term survival.

Authors:  Thierry Gaillard; Sonia Ramos-Pascual; Mo Saffarini; Jean-Pierre Piton
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2022-10-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.