Literature DB >> 25344962

Management of malfunctioning and recalled pacemaker and defibrillator leads: results of the European Heart Rhythm Association survey.

Maria Grazia Bongiorni1, Nikolaos Dagres2, Heidi Estner3, Laurent Pison4, Derick Todd5, Carina Blomstrom-Lundqvist6.   

Abstract

The aim of this survey was to describe the different strategies regarding the management of malfunctioning and recalled pacemaker and defibrillator leads across Europe. A questionnaire has been designed to assess the current practice and physician's approach to the management of leads which are faulty, unnecessary, and/or recalled. Responses to the questionnaire were received from 34 hospitals-members of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) electrophysiology (EP) research network. The survey involved both very high and low volume implanting centres, with 85% of the responding centres performing lead extraction. The survey provides a panoramic view of operator's decision making in the field of malfunctioning, recalled, and redundant leads and outlines a common point of view on lead abandonment and factors influencing the decision about lead extraction. The main factors strongly influencing the decision making were patient's age (59%), the presence of the damaged leads (44%), and the lead dwelling time (44%). Regarding the lead abandonment, the main concern (61%) was the potential greater difficulty associated with lead extraction in the future. High volume extracting centres showed a greater propensity to removing the malfunctioning or recalled leads compared with low volume or non-extracting centres. This EP Wire survey gives a snapshot of the operators' approaches and options regarding redundant, malfunctioning, and recalled lead management and may form the basis for future prospective research on this topic. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2014. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abandonment; Cardiac implantable electronic devices; EHRA survey; EP wire; Extraction; Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator; Leads; Malfunction; Pacemaker; Recall

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25344962     DOI: 10.1093/europace/euu302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  8 in total

Review 1.  Considerations for cardiac device lead extraction.

Authors:  Oussama Wazni; Bruce L Wilkoff
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 2.  Keeping up appearances: the radiographic evolution of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices.

Authors:  Benedict M Wiles; Caroline A Illingworth; John R Paisey; Paul R Roberts; Stephen P Harden
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Cardiac implantable electronic device lead extraction using the lead-locking device system: keeping it simple, safe, and inexpensive with mechanical tools and local anesthesia.

Authors:  Antonis S Manolis; Georgios Georgiopoulos; Sofia Metaxa; Spyridon Koulouris; Dimitris Tsiachris
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 1.596

4.  Treating an infected transcatheter pacemaker system via percutaneous extraction.

Authors:  Alan Koay; Surinder Khelae; Koh Kok Wei; Zulkeflee Muhammad; Rosli Mohd Ali; Razali Omar
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2016-05-10

5.  Retrieval of a transcatheter pacemaker in sheep after a mid-term implantation time.

Authors:  Maria Grazia Bongiorni; Luca Segreti; Andrea Di Cori; Matthew Bonner; Michael Eggen; Pamela Omdahl
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2015-10-23

6.  Perspectives in managing recalls of cardiac implantable electronic devices.

Authors:  Niraj Varma
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2016-12-14

7.  Editorial: Trapped pacemaker lead extraction: Necessity, challenge, and beyond.

Authors:  Toru Maruyama; Keita Odashiro
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2015-12-29

8.  Proposed treatment algorithm for cardiac device-related subclavian vein stenosis: a case series.

Authors:  Wei-Da Lu; Ju-Yi Chen
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2020-01-20
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.