Literature DB >> 25339065

Guanine to inosine substitution leads to large increases in the population of a transient G·C Hoogsteen base pair.

Evgenia N Nikolova1, Frederick Stull, Hashim M Al-Hashimi.   

Abstract

We recently showed that Watson-Crick base pairs in canonical duplex DNA exist in dynamic equilibrium with G(syn)·C+ and A(syn)·T Hoogsteen base pairs that have minute populations of ∼1%. Here, using nuclear magnetic resonance R1ρ relaxation dispersion, we show that substitution of guanine with the naturally occurring base inosine results in an ∼17-fold increase in the population of transient Hoogsteen base pairs, which can be rationalized by the loss of a Watson-Crick hydrogen bond. These results provide further support for transient Hoogsteen base pairs and demonstrate that their population can increase significantly upon damage or chemical modification of the base.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25339065      PMCID: PMC4245982          DOI: 10.1021/bi5011909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


We recently provided evidence[1−4] based on nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) R1ρ relaxation dispersion (RD)[5−7] and single-atom substitution experiments that G·C and A·T Watson–Crick (WC) base pairs (bps) transiently form Hoogsteen (HG) bps[8] with populations of ∼0.4 and 0.7% and lifetimes of 1.7 and 0.3 ms at pH ∼5.4 (Figure 1A). HG bps form through a 180° rotation of the purine base around the glycosidic bond from an anti to a syn conformation (Figure 1A). By modifying the structural and chemical presentation of DNA and modulating nucleobase accessibility, HG bps can play unique roles (reviewed in ref (9)) in DNA–protein recognition,[10−13] DNA damage induction[14] and repair,[15,16] and replication.[17,18]
Figure 1

WC–HG equilibrium in canonical G·C and inosine-substituted I·C base pairs. Shown are the relative populations (pA and pB) and transient state lifetimes (τB) obtained from 13C NMR RD at 26 °C and pH 5.4.

We provided evidence of transient HG bps based on analysis of R1ρ RD experiments, which quantify the degree of line broadening due to chemical exchange with a transient low-population species.[7] A two-state analysis of the RD data measured on a variety of G·C and A·T Watson–Crick bps in canonical duplex DNA was consistent with the existence of a transient species that features downfield-shifted purine base C8 and sugar C1′ chemical shifts. These chemical shifts are a hallmark of syn purine, where the base flips 180° about the glycosidic bond. Such a syn purine can be paired with pyrimidine via HG pairing. By using chemical modification, including N1-methyladenine (N1-Me-A) and N1-methylguanine (N1-Me-G), which are naturally occurring damaged forms of purine bases, we successfully trapped HG bps in duplex DNA and showed that they have the characteristic downfield-shifted carbon chemical shifts.[1] As further support for the assignment of HG bps for the observed transient state, we subsequently showed that the single-atom substitution, 7-deazaguanine and 7-deazaadenine, which specifically knocks out an HG H-bond between guanine N7 and cytosine N3 (N7···H–+N3) without affecting WC H-bonds, destabilizes the transient state, such that it can no longer be detected by NMR RD.[2] Here, we sought to shift the WC–HG equilibrium in the other direction, toward the HG state. In G·C bps, a transition toward HG bps preserves the O6···H–N4 H-bond present in WC pairing but leads to the loss of the N1–H···N3 and N2–H···O2 H-bonds, which are replaced with a single N7···H–+N3 H-bond that further requires protonation of cytosine N3 (Figure 1). Therefore, one would expect that, in inosine, the loss of the exocyclic amino group at position C2 of guanine would lead to the loss of a WC H-bond without affecting HG pairing and, consequently, lead to an increase in the population of the transient state observed using NMR RD. To examine the impact that replacement of guanine in the CA step with inosine would have on the WC–HG equilibrium, we prepared an A6-DNA duplex (A6-DNAI10) (Figure 2A), in which G10 was replaced with I10. We previously reported detailed NMR characterization of transient HG bps in A6-DNA as well as variants that bear chemical modifications and mutations at the same position.[1−3] Because of difficulties in preparing isotopically 13C/15N-labeled oligonucleotides with a modified inosine base that are required for obtaining high-quality off-resonance RD data, the strand complementary to the inosine-containing strand was 13C- and 15N-labeled. The two-dimensional 13C–1H heteronuclear single-quantum coherence NMR spectra of this selectively labeled strand were in very good agreement with spectra of A6-DNA indicating formation of a WC-like I·C bp that does not impact neighboring bps (Figure S1 of the Supporting Information). Because I10 could not be isotopically enriched and the unlabeled strand concentration was not high enough (∼0.5 mM), making it difficult to measure reliable R1ρ RD data at natural abundance, the complementary labeled C15 residue was used to probe chemical exchange at the I·C bp. In particular, formation of a G·C+ HG bp is accompanied by a significant downfield shift of the C-C6 chemical shift due to protonation of C-N3, and this can be used to probe the WC–HG equilibrium.[3] Here, replacement of G10 with I10 resulted in a measurable downfield chemical shift change toward the transient HG state as well as significant line broadening at C15-C6, consistent with increased WC–HG exchange at the I·C bp.
Figure 2

Increased level of R1ρ RD and HG bp formation at I·C. (A) A6-DNA highlighting the A·T or G·C bp substituted with inosine at the purine base. (B) On-resonance 13C R1ρ RD profiles comparing chemical exchange in G·C, I·C, and I·T bps (pH 5.2 for G·C C-C6 and pH 5.4 for all others). Solid lines represent best global fits to eq S1 of the Supporting Information. (C) Correlation between ΔG⧧WC-HG and ΔGWC-HG for WC bps[4] (data for the I·C bp colored blue). Shown are the best-fit line and corresponding Pearson coefficient (R) with (---) or without (—) inclusion of the I·C bp.

WC–HG equilibrium in canonical G·C and inosine-substituted I·C base pairs. Shown are the relative populations (pA and pB) and transient state lifetimes (τB) obtained from 13C NMR RD at 26 °C and pH 5.4. To quantify transient HG bp formation, we collected on- and off-resonance 13C RD dispersion on C15-C6 in A6-DNAI10. We observed substantially larger RD for C-C6 in the I·C bp than for C-C6 or G-C8 in the G·C bp under similar conditions (Figure 2B).[1] A two-state analysis of the RD data allowed for determination of all chemical exchange parameters, including the transient state chemical shift [ΔωAB(C6) = ωB(C6) – ωA(C6)], population (pB), and lifetime (τB = 1/k2) (Figure S2 and Table 2 of the Supporting Information). The transient state chemical shift for C15-C6 is ∼2.3 ppm downfield-shifted relative to the GS, consistent with formation of a HG bp, and is in excellent agreement with the downfield shift (∼2.3 ppm) obtained when the G10·C15 bp in A6-DNA is changed to a HG bp using guanine N1-methylation.[1] The magnitude of the C15-C6 downfield chemical shift is similar to that previously seen in C-C6 (∼2.2 ppm) or G-C8 (∼3.7 ppm) in transient G·C HG bps[1] and cannot explain the RD observed in the I·C bp being much larger than that in the G·C bp. Rather, the larger RD arises primarily from a substantial 17-fold increase in the population of HG bps in I·C (pB ∼ 11.8%) as compared to G·C (pB ∼ 0.7%). This is in accord with our expectations based on the loss of WC H-bonds without significantly affecting HG H-bonds. In particular, the relative stability of the WC bp is decreased by ∼1.8 kcal/mol in I·C compared to that in G·C. This is consistent with previous studies showing an ∼2 kcal/mol loss of B-DNA stability from a single G·C to I·C substitution[19,20] and could be explained by the loss of a single N–H···O bond or replacement of the N–H···O bond with a weaker C–H···O bond.[21] The increase in the HG population is accompanied by an increase in chemical exchange rate kex (kex = k1 + k2 increases ∼6-fold from ∼600 s–1 in G·C to 3500 s–1 in I·C), which corresponds to an ∼100-fold increase in the forward rate constant k1 and a much smaller ∼5-fold increase in the reverse rate constant k2. This translates into a simultaneous decrease in the free energy difference between WC and HG states (ΔGWC-HG) and the free energy required to reach the transition state (ΔG⧧WC-HG), which is in turn consistent with selective destabilization of WC due to the inosine substitution. We recently reported a similar trend based on ϕ value analysis of WC-to-HG transitions measured across diverse DNA sequence and position contexts, where k1 increased in sequences with more abundant HG bps and k2 exhibited a much weaker sequence dependence.[4] These results implied that the variations in the relative energetic stabilities of HG bps are dominated by variations in the stabilities of WC bps, as demonstrated by a direct correlation between ΔGWC-HG and ΔG⧧WC-HG.[4] Importantly, the observed correlation of sequence-dependent ΔG values for WC bps extrapolates to the ΔG values for the modified I·C bp (Figure 2C) and strongly supports our earlier proposal that WC bp stabilities, unlike HG bp stabilities, are highly sequence-dependent. The 5-fold increase in k2 could arise from destabilization of the HG bp, possibly because of the loss of H-bonding with solvent[11,22] or, alternatively, stabilization of the TS due to removal of the bulky amine group and more facile rotation of the purine base within the helix. While the structure of the TS remains unknown, most crystal structures of HG bps display H-bonds between G-NH2 and the backbone phosphate or water molecules. The loss of the NH2 group in inosine could contribute to the small (<1 kcal/mol) decrease in the stability of the transient HG I·C+ versus G·C+ state. As a control, we conducted on-resonance 13C R1ρ RD experiments at natural abundance on inosine C8 in an I·T bp, which should not be capable of stably forming HG bps. This is because only one H-bond can form in the I·T HG bp without additional tautomerization and/or protonation. Indeed, we observed no evidence of chemical exchange at I-C8 (Figure 2B), supporting the idea that the observed transient state results from specific pairing of inosine with an appropriate HG pairing partner. The results presented here provide additional evidence in support of transient HG bps in a canonical duplex and also show that HG bps can exist in much greater abundance in I·C bps. Inosine is a rare form of mutagenic damage that is recognized and excised by conserved repair enzymes such as DNA glycosylases and endonuclease V.[23] It is conceivable that the HG-type bps participate more broadly in damage recognition and repair, as could be the case for G·G, A·A, and A·C mispairs where the partially exposed HG face of the syn-purine is specifically recognized by the DNA mismatch repair enzyme MutS[15] or for the common oxidative damage 8-oxoguanine, which can form a stable HG-type bp with adenine.[24] HG-type bps involving inosine have already been implicated as the source of mutagenic substitutions, most frequently from A-T to G-C.[25] For example, syn-inosine has been observed to form an HG-type bp with protonated adenine at near-neutral pH,[26] which affords a possible mode of recognition for I·A+ mispairs. The observation of more abundant HG bps in I·C also raises the possibility that other forms of damage and chemical modifications may increase the abundance of these bps in genomes where they can potentially conduct unique biological functions. Increased level of R1ρ RD and HG bp formation at I·C. (A) A6-DNA highlighting the A·T or G·C bp substituted with inosine at the purine base. (B) On-resonance 13C R1ρ RD profiles comparing chemical exchange in G·C, I·C, and I·T bps (pH 5.2 for G·C C-C6 and pH 5.4 for all others). Solid lines represent best global fits to eq S1 of the Supporting Information. (C) Correlation between ΔG⧧WC-HG and ΔGWC-HG for WC bps[4] (data for the I·C bp colored blue). Shown are the best-fit line and corresponding Pearson coefficient (R) with (---) or without (—) inclusion of the I·C bp.
  25 in total

1.  A Hoogsteen base pair embedded in undistorted B-DNA.

Authors:  Jun Aishima; Rossitza K Gitti; Joyce E Noah; Hin Hark Gan; Tamar Schlick; Cynthia Wolberger
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  NMR R1 rho rotating-frame relaxation with weak radio frequency fields.

Authors:  Francesca Massi; Eric Johnson; Chunyu Wang; Mark Rance; Arthur G Palmer
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2004-02-25       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Crystal structure of an IHF-DNA complex: a protein-induced DNA U-turn.

Authors:  P A Rice; S Yang; K Mizuuchi; H A Nash
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-12-27       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Widespread transient Hoogsteen base pairs in canonical duplex DNA with variable energetics.

Authors:  Heidi S Alvey; Federico L Gottardo; Evgenia N Nikolova; Hashim M Al-Hashimi
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  TATA element recognition by the TATA box-binding protein has been conserved throughout evolution.

Authors:  G A Patikoglou; J L Kim; L Sun; S H Yang; T Kodadek; S K Burley
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  Replication by human DNA polymerase-iota occurs by Hoogsteen base-pairing.

Authors:  Deepak T Nair; Robert E Johnson; Satya Prakash; Louise Prakash; Aneel K Aggarwal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Error-prone replication of oxidatively damaged DNA by a high-fidelity DNA polymerase.

Authors:  Gerald W Hsu; Matthias Ober; Thomas Carell; Lorena S Beese
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-08-22       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The conformational variability of an adenosine.inosine base-pair in a synthetic DNA dodecamer.

Authors:  G A Leonard; E D Booth; W N Hunter; T Brown
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1992-09-25       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Inosine induced mutations.

Authors:  P L Nordmann; J C Makris; W S Reznikoff
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1988-09

10.  Structures of Escherichia coli DNA mismatch repair enzyme MutS in complex with different mismatches: a common recognition mode for diverse substrates.

Authors:  Ganesh Natrajan; Meindert H Lamers; Jacqueline H Enzlin; Herrie H K Winterwerp; Anastassis Perrakis; Titia K Sixma
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  5 in total

1.  Robust IR-based detection of stable and fractionally populated G-C+ and A-T Hoogsteen base pairs in duplex DNA.

Authors:  Allison L Stelling; Yu Xu; Huiqing Zhou; Seung H Choi; Mary C Clay; Dawn K Merriman; Hashim M Al-Hashimi
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 4.124

Review 2.  New insights into Hoogsteen base pairs in DNA duplexes from a structure-based survey.

Authors:  Huiqing Zhou; Bradley J Hintze; Isaac J Kimsey; Bharathwaj Sathyamoorthy; Shan Yang; Jane S Richardson; Hashim M Al-Hashimi
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Atomic structures of excited state A-T Hoogsteen base pairs in duplex DNA by combining NMR relaxation dispersion, mutagenesis, and chemical shift calculations.

Authors:  Honglue Shi; Mary C Clay; Atul Rangadurai; Bharathwaj Sathyamoorthy; David A Case; Hashim M Al-Hashimi
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 2.835

4.  Dependence of Fluorescence Quenching of CY3 Oligonucleotide Conjugates on the Oxidation Potential of the Stacking Base Pair.

Authors:  Jens Sobek; Ralph Schlapbach
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 4.411

5.  An intricate balance of hydrogen bonding, ion atmosphere and dynamics facilitates a seamless uracil to cytosine substitution in the U-turn of the neomycin-sensing riboswitch.

Authors:  Miroslav Krepl; Jennifer Vögele; Holger Kruse; Elke Duchardt-Ferner; Jens Wöhnert; Jiri Sponer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 16.971

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.