Literature DB >> 27038165

Pupillary correlates of lapses of sustained attention.

Nash Unsworth1, Matthew K Robison2.   

Abstract

The current study examined the extent to which pupillary responses (both pretrial baseline and phasic responses) would accurately track lapses of attention as predicted by theories of locus coeruleus norepinephrine (LC-NE) functioning. Participants performed a sustained attention task while pupil responses were continuously recorded. Periodically during the task, participants were presented with thought probes to determine if they were on or off task. The results suggested the pupillary responses accurately distinguished on from off-task states. Importantly, pretrial baseline pupil responses distinguished different types of lapses of attention, with inattentive and mind-wandering states being associated with small pretrial baseline pupil diameters on average and distracted states being associated with larger pretrial baseline pupil diameters on average compared to focused states. These results support the notion that pupil diameter is sensitive to different types of lapses of attention which may be associated with different LC-NE modes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Cognitive control; Norephinephrine

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27038165     DOI: 10.3758/s13415-016-0417-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  41 in total

1.  Working memory capacity and the antisaccade task: individual differences in voluntary saccade control.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Josef C Schrock; Randall W Engle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 2.  An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance.

Authors:  Gary Aston-Jones; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 12.449

3.  Pupil Size in Relation to Mental Activity during Simple Problem-Solving.

Authors:  E H Hess; J M Polt
Journal:  Science       Date:  1964-03-13       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Detecting phasic lapses in alertness using pupillometric measures.

Authors:  Sean D Kristjansson; John A Stern; Timothy B Brown; John W Rohrbaugh
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.661

5.  Individual differences in the allocation of attention to items in working memory: Evidence from pupillometry.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Matthew K Robison
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-06

6.  Similarities and differences between mind-wandering and external distraction: a latent variable analysis of lapses of attention and their relation to cognitive abilities.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Brittany D McMillan
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2014-05-08

7.  ADHD subjects fail to suppress eye blinks and microsaccades while anticipating visual stimuli but recover with medication.

Authors:  Moshe Fried; Eteri Tsitsiashvili; Yoram S Bonneh; Anna Sterkin; Tamara Wygnanski-Jaffe; Tamir Epstein; Uri Polat
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Pupillography as an objective indicator of fatigue.

Authors:  Y Morad; H Lemberg; N Yofe; Y Dagan
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.424

9.  Pupil diameter covaries with BOLD activity in human locus coeruleus.

Authors:  Peter R Murphy; Redmond G O'Connell; Michael O'Sullivan; Ian H Robertson; Joshua H Balsters
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Perspective: causes and functional significance of temporal variations in attention control.

Authors:  Agatha Lenartowicz; Gregory V Simpson; Mark S Cohen
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  57 in total

1.  Tracking arousal state and mind wandering with pupillometry.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Matthew K Robison
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Pupillary Dynamics Link Spontaneous and Task-Evoked Activations Recorded Directly from Human Insula.

Authors:  Aaron Kucyi; Josef Parvizi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  A locus coeruleus-norepinephrine account of individual differences in working memory capacity and attention control.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Matthew K Robison
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

4.  Individual differences in baseline oculometrics: Examining variation in baseline pupil diameter, spontaneous eye blink rate, and fixation stability.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Matthew K Robison; Ashley L Miller
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Pupil Sizes Scale with Attentional Load and Task Experience in a Multiple Object Tracking Task.

Authors:  Basil Wahn; Daniel P Ferris; W David Hairston; Peter König
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Coordinating long-latency stretch responses across the shoulder, elbow, and wrist during goal-directed reaching.

Authors:  Jeffrey Weiler; James Saravanamuttu; Paul L Gribble; J Andrew Pruszynski
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Captivated by thought: "Sticky" thinking leaves traces of perceptual decoupling in task-evoked pupil size.

Authors:  Stefan Huijser; Mathanja Verkaik; Marieke K van Vugt; Niels A Taatgen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  What did you have in mind? Examining the content of intentional and unintentional types of mind wandering.

Authors:  Paul Seli; Brandon C W Ralph; Mahiko Konishi; Daniel Smilek; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2017-03-31

9.  Ventromedial prefrontal damage reduces mind-wandering and biases its temporal focus.

Authors:  Elena Bertossi; Elisa Ciaramelli
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Age-related changes in the functional integrity of the phasic alerting system: a pupillometric investigation.

Authors:  Mingjian He; William C Heindel; Matthew R Nassar; Elizabeth M Siefert; Elena K Festa
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 4.673

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.