Literature DB >> 25320537

S-1 plus gemcitabine chemotherapy followed by concurrent radiotherapy and maintenance therapy with S-1 for unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Qing-Hua Ke1, Shi-Qiong Zhou1, Ji-Yuan Yang1, Wei Du1, Gai Liang1, Yong Lei1, Fei Luo1.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the feasibility and efficacy of the combination of S-1 with gemcitabine followed by oral S-1 with concurrent radiotherapy (intensity modulated radiotherapy, IMRT) and maintenance therapy with S-1 for locally advanced pancreatic cancer.
METHODS: Subjects selected in the study were patients who had unresectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer without distant metastases, adequate organ and marrow functions, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 and no prior anticancer therapy. Initially the subjects received two cycles of chemotherapy, oral administration of S-1 40 mg/m(2) twice daily from day 1 to day 14 of a 21-d cycle, with 30-min intravenous infusions of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on day 1 and day 8. Two weeks after the completion of chemotherapy, S-1 was administered orally with concurrent IMRT. Oral S-1 was administered at a dose of 80 mg/m(2) per day twice daily from day 1 to day 14 and from day 22 to day 35. Radiation was concurrently delivered at a dose of 50.4 Gy (1.8 Gy/d, 5 times per week, 28 fractions). One month after the completion of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, S-1 was administered orally at a dose of 80 mg/m(2) per day twice daily for 14 d, followed by a 14-d rest period. This cycle was repeated as maintenance therapy, until unacceptable toxicity occurred or the disease worsened. Thirty-two patients were involved in this study. The median follow-up was 15.6 mo (range: 8.6-32.3 mo).
RESULTS: Thirty-two patients completed the scheduled course of chemotherapy, while 30 patients (93.8%) received chemoradiotherapy with two patients ceasing to continue with radiotherapy. The major toxic effects were nausea and leukopenia. There was no grade 4 toxicity or treatment-related death. According to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria, the objective tumor response was partial response in 17 (53.1%) patients, stable disease in 9 (28.1%), and progressive disease in 6 (18.8%). The median overall survival and median progression-free survival were 15.2 mo and 9.3 mo, respectively. The survival rates at 1 year and 2 years were 75% and 34.4%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The combination of S-1 with gemcitabine followed by oral S-1 with IMRT and maintenance therapy with S-1 alone in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer may be considered a well-tolerated, promising treatment regimen.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CA19-9; Chemoradiotherapy; Pancreatic cancer; Radiosensitizer; S-1

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25320537      PMCID: PMC4194583          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i38.13987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  34 in total

1.  Neo-adjuvant chemoradiation therapy using S-1 followed by surgical resection in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Sohei Satoi; Hideyoshi Toyokawa; Hiroaki Yanagimoto; Tomohisa Yamamoto; Minoru Kamata; Chisato Ohe; Noriko Sakaida; Yoshiko Uemura; Hiroaki Kitade; Noboru Tanigawa; Kentaro Inoue; Yoichi Matsui; A-Hon Kwon
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Randomized phase II study of gemcitabine and S-1 combination versus gemcitabine alone in the treatment of unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer (Japan Clinical Cancer Research Organization PC-01 study).

Authors:  Masato Ozaka; Yuji Matsumura; Hiroshi Ishii; Yasushi Omuro; Takao Itoi; Hisatsugu Mouri; Keiji Hanada; Yasutoshi Kimura; Iruru Maetani; Yoshinobu Okabe; Masaji Tani; Takaaki Ikeda; Susumu Hijioka; Ryouhei Watanabe; Shinya Ohoka; Yuki Hirose; Masafumi Suyama; Naoto Egawa; Atsushi Sofuni; Takaaki Ikari; Toshifusa Nakajima
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 3.  The promise and pitfalls of positron emission tomography and single-photon emission computed tomography molecular imaging-guided radiation therapy.

Authors:  Richard L Wahl; Joseph M Herman; Eric Ford
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.934

4.  Potential for dose-escalation and reduction of risk in pancreatic cancer using IMRT optimization with lexicographic ordering and gEUD-based cost functions.

Authors:  Aaron C Spalding; Kyung-Wook Jee; Karen Vineberg; Marla Jablonowski; Benedick A Fraass; Charlie C Pan; Theodore S Lawrence; Randall K Ten Haken; Edgar Ben-Josef
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin compared with single-agent gemcitabine as first-line treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: the GIP-1 study.

Authors:  Giuseppe Colucci; Roberto Labianca; Francesco Di Costanzo; Vittorio Gebbia; Giacomo Cartenì; Bruno Massidda; Elisa Dapretto; Luigi Manzione; Elena Piazza; Mirella Sannicolò; Marco Ciaparrone; Luigi Cavanna; Francesco Giuliani; Evaristo Maiello; Antonio Testa; Paolo Pederzoli; Massimo Falconi; Ciro Gallo; Massimo Di Maio; Francesco Perrone
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Phase III study comparing gemcitabine plus cetuximab versus gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Southwest Oncology Group-directed intergroup trial S0205.

Authors:  Philip A Philip; Jacqueline Benedetti; Christopher L Corless; Ralph Wong; Eileen M O'Reilly; Patrick J Flynn; Kendrith M Rowland; James N Atkins; Barry C Mirtsching; Saul E Rivkin; Alok A Khorana; Bryan Goldman; Cecilia M Fenoglio-Preiser; James L Abbruzzese; Charles D Blanke
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Impact of chemoradiotherapy after disease control with chemotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma in GERCOR phase II and III studies.

Authors:  Florence Huguet; Thierry André; Pascal Hammel; Pascal Artru; Jacques Balosso; Frédéric Selle; Elisabeth Deniaud-Alexandre; Philippe Ruszniewski; Emmanuel Touboul; Roberto Labianca; Aimery de Gramont; Christophe Louvet
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-01-20       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  A phase I study of erlotinib in combination with gemcitabine and radiation in locally advanced, non-operable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  A Duffy; J Kortmansky; G K Schwartz; M Capanu; S Puleio; B Minsky; L Saltz; D P Kelsen; E M O'Reilly
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Phase II study of bevacizumab with concurrent capecitabine and radiation followed by maintenance gemcitabine and bevacizumab for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group RTOG 0411.

Authors:  Christopher H Crane; Kathryn Winter; William F Regine; Howard Safran; Tyvin A Rich; Walter Curran; Robert A Wolff; Christopher G Willett
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  A phase II study of fixed-dose rate gemcitabine plus low-dose cisplatin followed by consolidative chemoradiation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Andrew H Ko; Jeanne M Quivey; Alan P Venook; Emily K Bergsland; Elizabeth Dito; Brian Schillinger; Margaret A Tempero
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Current status and progress of pancreatic cancer in China.

Authors:  Quan-Jun Lin; Feng Yang; Chen Jin; De-Liang Fu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer achieves a high rate of R0 resection.

Authors:  Florence Huguet; Carla Hajj; Corrine B Winston; Weiji Shi; Zhigang Zhang; Abraham J Wu; Eileen M O'Reilly; Diane L Reidy; Peter Allen; Karyn A Goodman
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 4.089

3.  Maintenance therapy improves the survival outcomes of patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma responding to first-line chemotherapy: a multicentre, randomized controlled clinical study.

Authors:  Ying Lu; Haixin Huang; Hui Yang; Xiaohua Hu; Meilian Liu; Changjie Huang; Xianbin Feng; Xishan Chen; Zhou Jiang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 4.322

Review 4.  The Role of Consolidation Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Chang; Yen-Feng Chiu; Jih-Chang Yu; Li-Tzong Chen; Hui-Ju Ch'ang
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 4.679

5.  Maintenance chemotherapy using S-1 following definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with N3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Jingfeng Zong; Hanchuan Xu; Bijuan Chen; Qiaojuan Guo; Yun Xu; Chuanben Chen; Youliang Weng; Wei Zheng; Jianji Pan; Shaojun Lin
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Modeling Combined Chemotherapy and Particle Therapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Marco Durante; Francesco Tommasino; Shigeru Yamada
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Effects of oral maintenance chemotherapy and predictive value of circulating EBV DNA in metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Han Zhou; Tianzhu Lu; Qiaojuan Guo; Yan Chen; Mengwei Chen; Yansong Chen; Yingying Lin; Chuanben Chen; Liqin Ma; Yun Xu; Shaojun Lin; Jianji Pan
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-02-23       Impact factor: 4.452

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.