Ying Lu1, Haixin Huang2, Hui Yang1, Xiaohua Hu3, Meilian Liu4, Changjie Huang5, Xianbin Feng6, Xishan Chen1, Zhou Jiang1. 1. Department of Oncology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, No.1 Liushi Road, Liuzhou, 545000, Guangxi, China. 2. Department of Oncology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, No.1 Liushi Road, Liuzhou, 545000, Guangxi, China. 13507726193@163.com. 3. Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530000, China. 4. Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical College, Guilin, 541000, China. 5. Department of Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530000, China. 6. Department of Oncology, Liuzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Liuzhou, 545000, China.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To explore the safety and role of tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil (S1) maintenance therapy (MT) in metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients after response to first-line chemotherapy and to assess outcome-associated biomarkers. METHODS: This was a multicentre, open-label, randomized controlled study involving metastatic NPC patients recruited (from May 2015 to May 2019) at five hospitals in China. The participants were randomized to S1-MT (receiving S1 MT until disease progression or intolerance) or non-MT (followed up until disease progression) groups. The primary endpoint was the progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were the overall survival (OS), the correlation between EBV-DNA, serum amyloid A (SAA) status, and outcomes after the first-line chemotherapy, and safety. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 24.3 months; 88 and 95 participants were evaluable in the S1-MT and non-MT groups, respectively. Compared with non-MT, S1-MT prolonged PFS (16.9 vs. 9.3 months, P < 0.001) and OS (33.6 vs. 20.6 months, P < 0.001). Regardless of their EBV-DNA status after first-line chemotherapy, participants were able to benefit from S1 MT, but EBV-DNA-positive participants benefited more significantly (PFS: HR = 0.600, 95% CI = 0.373-0.965, P = 0.035; OS: HR = 0.393, 95% CI = 0.227-0.681, P = 0.001). MT only improved PFS and OS in patients with an SAA decline after first-line chemotherapy (PFS: HR = 0.570, 95% CI = 0.350-0.919, P = 0.021; OS: HR = 0.404, 95% CI = 0.230-0.709, P = 0.002). The median S1 treatment was 23 cycles. Grade 1-2 skin pigmentation, oral mucositis, and hand and foot syndrome were the main adverse reactions. CONCLUSION: For metastatic NPC patients with first-line chemotherapy response, S1 MT can improve PFS and OS, with good tolerability. EBV-DNA and SAA can better help us identify patients who can benefit from MT after standard treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study protocol was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-IOR-16007939).
PURPOSE: To explore the safety and role of tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil (S1) maintenance therapy (MT) in metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients after response to first-line chemotherapy and to assess outcome-associated biomarkers. METHODS: This was a multicentre, open-label, randomized controlled study involving metastatic NPC patients recruited (from May 2015 to May 2019) at five hospitals in China. The participants were randomized to S1-MT (receiving S1 MT until disease progression or intolerance) or non-MT (followed up until disease progression) groups. The primary endpoint was the progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were the overall survival (OS), the correlation between EBV-DNA, serum amyloid A (SAA) status, and outcomes after the first-line chemotherapy, and safety. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 24.3 months; 88 and 95 participants were evaluable in the S1-MT and non-MT groups, respectively. Compared with non-MT, S1-MT prolonged PFS (16.9 vs. 9.3 months, P < 0.001) and OS (33.6 vs. 20.6 months, P < 0.001). Regardless of their EBV-DNA status after first-line chemotherapy, participants were able to benefit from S1 MT, but EBV-DNA-positive participants benefited more significantly (PFS: HR = 0.600, 95% CI = 0.373-0.965, P = 0.035; OS: HR = 0.393, 95% CI = 0.227-0.681, P = 0.001). MT only improved PFS and OS in patients with an SAA decline after first-line chemotherapy (PFS: HR = 0.570, 95% CI = 0.350-0.919, P = 0.021; OS: HR = 0.404, 95% CI = 0.230-0.709, P = 0.002). The median S1 treatment was 23 cycles. Grade 1-2 skin pigmentation, oral mucositis, and hand and foot syndrome were the main adverse reactions. CONCLUSION: For metastatic NPC patients with first-line chemotherapy response, S1 MT can improve PFS and OS, with good tolerability. EBV-DNA and SAA can better help us identify patients who can benefit from MT after standard treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study protocol was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-IOR-16007939).
Authors: Anthony T C Chan; Mow-Ming Hsu; Boon C Goh; Edwin P Hui; Tsang-Wu Liu; Michael J Millward; Ruey-Long Hong; Jacqueline Whang-Peng; Brigette B Y Ma; Ka F To; Matthias Mueser; Nadia Amellal; Xiao Lin; Alex Y Chang Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-04-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: K C Allen Chan; John K S Woo; Ann King; Benny C Y Zee; W K Jacky Lam; Stephen L Chan; Sam W I Chu; Constance Mak; Irene O L Tse; Samantha Y M Leung; Gloria Chan; Edwin P Hui; Brigette B Y Ma; Rossa W K Chiu; Sing-Fai Leung; Andrew C van Hasselt; Anthony T C Chan; Y M Dennis Lo Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-08-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: William C S Cho; Timothy T C Yip; Christine Yip; Victor Yip; Vanitha Thulasiraman; Roger K C Ngan; Tai-Tung Yip; Wai-Hon Lau; Joseph S K Au; Stephen C K Law; Wai-Wai Cheng; Victor W S Ma; Cadmon K P Lim Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2004-01-01 Impact factor: 12.531