Literature DB >> 25315377

Effects of noise reduction on speech intelligibility, perceived listening effort, and personal preference in hearing-impaired listeners.

Inge Brons1, Rolph Houben2, Wouter A Dreschler2.   

Abstract

This study evaluates the perceptual effects of single-microphone noise reduction in hearing aids. Twenty subjects with moderate sensorineural hearing loss listened to speech in babble noise processed via noise reduction from three different linearly fitted hearing aids. Subjects performed (a) speech-intelligibility tests, (b) listening-effort ratings, and (c) paired-comparison ratings on noise annoyance, speech naturalness, and overall preference. The perceptual effects of noise reduction differ between hearing aids. The results agree well with those of normal-hearing listeners in a previous study. None of the noise-reduction algorithms improved speech intelligibility, but all reduced the annoyance of noise. The noise reduction that scored best with respect to noise annoyance and preference had the worst intelligibility scores. The trade-off between intelligibility and listening comfort shows that preference measurements might be useful in addition to intelligibility measurements in the selection of noise reduction. Additionally, this trade-off should be taken into consideration to create realistic expectations in hearing-aid users.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hearing aids; intelligibility; noise reduction; perceived listening effort; preference

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25315377      PMCID: PMC4227664          DOI: 10.1177/2331216514553924

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Hear        ISSN: 2331-2165            Impact factor:   3.293


  24 in total

1.  Evaluation of the noise reduction system in a commercial digital hearing aid.

Authors:  José L Alcántara; Brian C J Moore; Volker Kühnel; Stefan Launer
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Effects of noise suppression on intelligibility: dependency on signal-to-noise ratios.

Authors:  Gaston Hilkhuysen; Nikolay Gaubitch; Mike Brookes; Mark Huckvale
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Sound quality measures for speech in noise through a commercial hearing aid implementing digital noise reduction.

Authors:  Todd A Ricketts; Benjamin W Y Hornsby
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Comparison of performance on the hearing in noise test using directional microphones and digital noise reduction algorithms.

Authors:  Stacie Nordrum; Susan Erler; Dean Garstecki; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.493

Review 5.  Time-frequency masking for speech separation and its potential for hearing aid design.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-10-30

6.  Digital noise reduction: outcomes from laboratory and field studies.

Authors:  Ruth Bentler; Yu-Hsiang Wu; Jerrica Kettel; Richard Hurtig
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 7.  Cognition and hearing aids.

Authors:  Thomas Lunner; Mary Rudner; Jerker Rönnberg
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  2009-10

8.  A "rationalized" arcsine transform.

Authors:  G A Studebaker
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1985-09

9.  Perceptual consequences of different signal changes due to binaural noise reduction: do hearing loss and working memory capacity play a role?

Authors:  Tobias Neher; Giso Grimm; Volker Hohmann
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  The effect of hearing aid noise reduction on listening effort in hearing-impaired adults.

Authors:  Jamie L Desjardins; Karen A Doherty
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  8 in total

1.  Classification of Hearing Aids Into Feature Profiles Using Hierarchical Latent Class Analysis Applied to a Large Dataset of Hearing Aids.

Authors:  Simon Lansbergen; Wouter A Dreschler
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 2.  Why Do Hearing Aids Fail to Restore Normal Auditory Perception?

Authors:  Nicholas A Lesica
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 13.837

3.  Interactions Between Digital Noise Reduction and Reverberation: Acoustic and Behavioral Effects.

Authors:  Paul Reinhart; Pavel Zahorik; Pamela Souza
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Benefit From Directional Microphone Hearing Aids: Objective and Subjective Evaluations.

Authors:  Hee-Sung Park; Il Joon Moon; Sun Hwa Jin; Ji Eun Choi; Yang-Sun Cho; Sung Hwa Hong
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.372

Review 5.  Effects of Hearing Impairment and Hearing Aid Amplification on Listening Effort: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Barbara Ohlenforst; Adriana A Zekveld; Elise P Jansma; Yang Wang; Graham Naylor; Artur Lorens; Thomas Lunner; Sophia E Kramer
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Efficacy of a Hearing Aid Noise Reduction Function.

Authors:  Lena L N Wong; Yuan Chen; Qianran Wang; Volker Kuehnel
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  Evaluation of Noise Reduction Algorithms in Hearing Aids for Multiple Signals From Equal or Different Directions.

Authors:  Hendrik Husstedt; Alfred Mertins; Marlitt Frenz
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  Influence of Three Auditory Profiles on Aided Speech Perception in Different Noise Scenarios.

Authors:  Mengfan Wu; Oscar M Cañete; Jesper Hvass Schmidt; Michal Fereczkowski; Tobias Neher
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.