Literature DB >> 16119254

Sound quality measures for speech in noise through a commercial hearing aid implementing digital noise reduction.

Todd A Ricketts1, Benjamin W Y Hornsby.   

Abstract

This brief report discusses the affect of digital noise reduction (DNR) processing on aided speech recognition and sound quality measures in 14 adults fitted with a commercial hearing aid. Measures of speech recognition and sound quality were obtained in two different speech-in-noise conditions (71 dBA speech, +6 dB SNR and 75 dBA speech, +1 dB SNR). The results revealed that the presence or absence of DNR processing did not impact speech recognition in noise (either positively or negatively). Paired comparisons of sound quality for the same speech in noise signals, however, revealed a strong preference for DNR processing. These data suggest that at least one implementation of DNR processing is capable of providing improved sound quality, for speech in noise, in the absence of improved speech recognition.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16119254     DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.16.5.2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  24 in total

1.  The effects of digital noise reduction on the acceptance of background noise.

Authors:  H Gustav Mueller; Jennifer Weber; Benjamin W Y Hornsby
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-06

Review 2.  Digital noise reduction: an overview.

Authors:  Ruth Bentler; Li-Kuei Chiou
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-06

3.  Age-related hearing loss increases full-brain connectivity while reversing directed signaling within the dorsal-ventral pathway for speech.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Md Sultan Mahmud; Mohammed Yeasin; Dawei Shen; Stephen R Arnott; Claude Alain
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 3.270

4.  The EarLens system: new sound transduction methods.

Authors:  Rodney Perkins; Jonathan P Fay; Paul Rucker; Micha Rosen; Lisa Olson; Sunil Puria
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Amplification with digital noise reduction and the perception of annoying and aversive sounds.

Authors:  Catherine V Palmer; Ruth Bentler; H Gustav Mueller
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-06

6.  Interactions Between Digital Noise Reduction and Reverberation: Acoustic and Behavioral Effects.

Authors:  Paul Reinhart; Pavel Zahorik; Pamela Souza
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  Effects of digital noise reduction on speech perception for children with hearing loss.

Authors:  Patricia Stelmachowicz; Dawna Lewis; Brenda Hoover; Kanae Nishi; Ryan McCreery; William Woods
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Effects of expansion on consonant recognition and consonant audibility.

Authors:  Marc Brennan; Pamela Souza
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  Listening effort and perceived clarity for normal-hearing children with the use of digital noise reduction.

Authors:  Samantha Gustafson; Ryan McCreery; Brenda Hoover; Judy G Kopun; Pat Stelmachowicz
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 10.  An evidence-based systematic review of directional microphones and digital noise reduction hearing aids in school-age children with hearing loss.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Rebecca A Venediktov; Jaumeiko J Coleman; Hillary M Leech
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 1.493

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.