Literature DB >> 18974204

Time-frequency masking for speech separation and its potential for hearing aid design.

.   

Abstract

A new approach to the separation of speech from speech-in-noise mixtures is the use of time-frequency (T-F) masking. Originated in the field of computational auditory scene analysis, T-F masking performs separation in the time-frequency domain. This article introduces the T-F masking concept and reviews T-F masking algorithms that separate target speech from either monaural or binaural mixtures, as well as microphone-array recordings. The review emphasizes techniques that are promising for hearing aid design. This article also surveys recent studies that evaluate the perceptual effects of T-F masking techniques, particularly their effectiveness in improving human speech recognition in noise. An assessment is made of the potential benefits of T-F masking methods for the hearing impaired in light of the processing constraints of hearing aids. Finally, several issues pertinent to T-F masking are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18974204      PMCID: PMC4111459          DOI: 10.1177/1084713808326455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Amplif        ISSN: 1084-7138


  22 in total

1.  A speech corpus for multitalker communications research.

Authors:  R S Bolia; W T Nelson; M A Ericson; B D Simpson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Anthropometric manikin for acoustic research.

Authors:  M D Burkhard; R M Sachs
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Design, optimization and evaluation of a Danish sentence test in noise.

Authors:  Kirsten Wagener; Jane Lignel Josvassen; Regitze Ardenkjaer
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Speech segregation based on sound localization.

Authors:  Nicoleta Roman; DeLiang Wang; Guy J Brown
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Factors influencing intelligibility of ideal binary-masked speech: implications for noise reduction.

Authors:  Ning Li; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Separation of speech from interfering sounds based on oscillatory correlation.

Authors:  D L Wang; G J Brown
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Netw       Date:  1999

7.  Speech perception of noise with binary gains.

Authors:  DeLiang Wang; Ulrik Kjems; Michael S Pedersen; Jesper B Boldt; Thomas Lunner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Segregation of unvoiced speech from nonspeech interference.

Authors:  Guoning Hu; DeLiang Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking.

Authors:  DeLiang Wang; Ulrik Kjems; Michael S Pedersen; Jesper B Boldt; Thomas Lunner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  14 in total

1.  Perceptual weighting of the envelope and fine structure across frequency bands for sentence intelligibility: effect of interruption at the syllabic-rate and periodic-rate of speech.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  An ideal quantized mask to increase intelligibility and quality of speech in noise.

Authors:  Eric W Healy; Jordan L Vasko
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Perceptual learning for speech in noise after application of binary time-frequency masks.

Authors:  Mahnaz Ahmadi; Vauna L Gross; Donal G Sinex
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Recognition of speech in noise after application of time-frequency masks: dependence on frequency and threshold parameters.

Authors:  Donal G Sinex
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Reconstruction techniques for improving the perceptual quality of binary masked speech.

Authors:  Donald S Williamson; Yuxuan Wang; DeLiang Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Cognitive hearing science: the legacy of Stuart Gatehouse.

Authors:  Jerker Rönnberg; Mary Rudner; Thomas Lunner
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2011-05-22

7.  Dynamic relation between working memory capacity and speech recognition in noise during the first 6 months of hearing aid use.

Authors:  Elaine H N Ng; Elisabet Classon; Birgitta Larsby; Stig Arlinger; Thomas Lunner; Mary Rudner; Jerker Rönnberg
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2014-11-23       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  Effects of noise reduction on speech intelligibility, perceived listening effort, and personal preference in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Inge Brons; Rolph Houben; Wouter A Dreschler
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Hearing impairment, cognition and speech understanding: exploratory factor analyses of a comprehensive test battery for a group of hearing aid users, the n200 study.

Authors:  Jerker Rönnberg; Thomas Lunner; Elaine Hoi Ning Ng; Björn Lidestam; Adriana Agatha Zekveld; Patrik Sörqvist; Björn Lyxell; Ulf Träff; Wycliffe Yumba; Elisabet Classon; Mathias Hällgren; Birgitta Larsby; Carine Signoret; M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Mary Rudner; Henrik Danielsson; Stefan Stenfelt
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 10.  Working Memory and Hearing Aid Processing: Literature Findings, Future Directions, and Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Kathryn Arehart; Tobias Neher
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-12-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.