Literature DB >> 12564514

Evaluation of the noise reduction system in a commercial digital hearing aid.

José L Alcántara1, Brian C J Moore, Volker Kühnel, Stefan Launer.   

Abstract

We evaluated the effectiveness of a noise reduction system implemented in a commercial digital multichannel compression hearing aid. Eight experienced hearing aid wearers with moderate sensorineural hearing loss were fitted bilaterally according to the manufacturer's fitting guidelines. After a 3-month period of regular use of two programs, one with and one without the noise reduction system, speech recognition thresholds (SRTs) were measured in four types of background noise, including steady noise, and noises with spectral and/or temporal dips. SRTs were very similar with and without the noise reduction system; in both cases, SRTs were markedly lower than for unaided listening. SRTs were lower for the noises with dips than for the steady noise, especially for the aided conditions, indicating that amplification can help to 'listen in the dips'. Ratings of sound quality and listening comfort in the aided conditions were uniformly high and very similar with and without the noise reduction system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12564514     DOI: 10.3109/14992020309056083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  22 in total

Review 1.  Challenges and recent developments in hearing aids. Part I. Speech understanding in noise, microphone technologies and noise reduction algorithms.

Authors:  King Chung
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004

2.  The effects of digital noise reduction on the acceptance of background noise.

Authors:  H Gustav Mueller; Jennifer Weber; Benjamin W Y Hornsby
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-06

Review 3.  Digital noise reduction: an overview.

Authors:  Ruth Bentler; Li-Kuei Chiou
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-06

4.  Gain-induced speech distortions and the absence of intelligibility benefit with existing noise-reduction algorithms.

Authors:  Gibak Kim; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Measuring time-frequency importance functions of speech with bubble noise.

Authors:  Michael I Mandel; Sarah E Yoho; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Amplification with digital noise reduction and the perception of annoying and aversive sounds.

Authors:  Catherine V Palmer; Ruth Bentler; H Gustav Mueller
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-06

7.  Effects of digital noise reduction on speech perception for children with hearing loss.

Authors:  Patricia Stelmachowicz; Dawna Lewis; Brenda Hoover; Kanae Nishi; Ryan McCreery; William Woods
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Benefit From Directional Microphone Hearing Aids: Objective and Subjective Evaluations.

Authors:  Hee-Sung Park; Il Joon Moon; Sun Hwa Jin; Ji Eun Choi; Yang-Sun Cho; Sung Hwa Hong
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.372

9.  Short-term word-learning rate in children with normal hearing and children with hearing loss in limited and extended high-frequency bandwidths.

Authors:  Andrea L Pittman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Listening effort and perceived clarity for normal-hearing children with the use of digital noise reduction.

Authors:  Samantha Gustafson; Ryan McCreery; Brenda Hoover; Judy G Kopun; Pat Stelmachowicz
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.