Literature DB >> 18698521

Digital noise reduction: outcomes from laboratory and field studies.

Ruth Bentler1, Yu-Hsiang Wu, Jerrica Kettel, Richard Hurtig.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of a digital noise reduction (DNR) scheme implemented in a current commercial hearing aid. In a double-blinded design, three conditions of onset time (4, 8, 16 seconds) were randomly assigned to the 25 subjects, plus one condition wherein the noise-reduction feature was disengaged. Subsequently, a fifth trial/condition, wherein the subject had access to three memories in which the different onsets were programmed, was carried out. For each of the five conditions, the subjects had an at-home trial, prior to obtaining self-report measures. Laboratory measures of speech perception showed no effect of the DNR, with or without the provision of visual cues. Laboratory-based ratings of ease of listening showed DNR-on (all onset times) to be rated significantly better than DNR-off; for ratings of listening comfort, the 4-second onset time was rated significantly lower (poorer) than the 8-second onset or the DNR-off condition; for ratings of sound quality, DNR-on or -off had no differential effect. Self-report measures indicated significantly higher aversiveness in the DNR-off condition compared to the pre-test scores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18698521     DOI: 10.1080/14992020802033091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  38 in total

1.  The effects of selective consonant amplification on sentence recognition in noise by hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Rithika Saripella; Philipos C Loizou; Linda Thibodeau; Jennifer A Alford
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Channel selection in the modulation domain for improved speech intelligibility in noise.

Authors:  Kamil K Wójcicki; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Innovative technology in hearing instruments: matching needs in the developing world.

Authors:  Bradley McPherson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2011-11-07

4.  Spatial separation benefit for unaided and aided listening.

Authors:  Jayne B Ahlstrom; Amy R Horwitz; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Reasons why current speech-enhancement algorithms do not improve speech intelligibility and suggested solutions.

Authors:  Philipos C Loizou; Gibak Kim
Journal:  IEEE Trans Audio Speech Lang Process       Date:  2011

6.  Extending the articulation index to account for non-linear distortions introduced by noise-suppression algorithms.

Authors:  Philipos C Loizou; Jianfen Ma
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Gain-induced speech distortions and the absence of intelligibility benefit with existing noise-reduction algorithms.

Authors:  Gibak Kim; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Talking points: A modulating circle reduces listening effort without improving speech recognition.

Authors:  Julia F Strand; Violet A Brown; Dennis L Barbour
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

9.  Is the Device-Oriented Subjective Outcome (DOSO) Independent of Personality?

Authors:  Yu-Hsiang Wu; Kelsey Dumanch; Elizabeth Stangl; Christi Miller; Kelly Tremblay; Ruth Bentler
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  Effects of digital noise reduction on speech perception for children with hearing loss.

Authors:  Patricia Stelmachowicz; Dawna Lewis; Brenda Hoover; Kanae Nishi; Ryan McCreery; William Woods
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.