Literature DB >> 25312505

Advances on genetic rat models of epilepsy.

Tadao Serikawa1, Tomoji Mashimo, Takashi Kuramoro, Birger Voigt, Yukihiro Ohno, Masashi Sasa.   

Abstract

Considering the suitability of laboratory rats in epilepsy research, we and other groups have been developing genetic models of epilepsy in this species. After epileptic rats or seizure-susceptible rats were sporadically found in outbred stocks, the epileptic traits were usually genetically-fixed by selective breeding. So far, the absence seizure models GAERS and WAG/Rij, audiogenic seizure models GEPR-3 and GEPR-9, generalized tonic-clonic seizure models IER, NER and WER, and Canavan-disease related epileptic models TRM and SER have been established. Dissection of the genetic bases including causative genes in these epileptic rat models would be a significant step toward understanding epileptogenesis. N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) mutagenesis provides a systematic approach which allowed us to develop two novel epileptic rat models: heat-induced seizure susceptible (Hiss) rats with an Scn1a missense mutation and autosomal dominant lateral temporal epilepsy (ADLTE) model rats with an Lgi1 missense mutation. In addition, we have established episodic ataxia type 1 (EA1) model rats with a Kcna1 missense mutation derived from the ENU-induced rat mutant stock, and identified a Cacna1a missense mutation in a N-Methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU)-induced mutant rat strain GRY, resulting in the discovery of episodic ataxia type 2 (EA2) model rats. Thus, epileptic rat models have been established on the two paths: 'phenotype to gene' and 'gene to phenotype'. In the near future, development of novel epileptic rat models will be extensively promoted by the use of sophisticated genome editing technologies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25312505      PMCID: PMC4329510          DOI: 10.1538/expanim.14-0066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Anim        ISSN: 0007-5124


Introduction

Epilepsy is a brain disorder affecting approximately 1% of the worldwide population. The etiology of epilepsy would be fundamentally divided into two categories: idiopathic and symptomatic. Pre-clinical studies using animal models play a very important role in the evaluation of new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Simple models of acute seizures, such as the maximal electroshock seizure test and the subcutaneous pentylenetetrazole seizure test in mice and rats, were regarded to be the standard procedures for predicting the clinical anticonvulsant activity of drug candidates in former years. Next, kindling models and genetic models in the species were added to overcome the serious problems such as false-positive and false-negative evaluations of the drug candidates. Certainly, with the appropriate medication, seizures in the majority of patients can be well controlled. However, current medications still fail to control seizures in 20–30% of patients [63]. Uncontrollable seizures have a significant negative impact on patients’ quality of life, and can also interfere with memory and cognitive function. Positional cloning strategies in multigenerational families of Mendelian idiopathic epilepsies have successfully revealed gene mutations [15]. Since the introduction of the next generation sequencing, identification of causal gene mutations in epileptic patients has been speedily processed by using exome sequencing and dense microarray based comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH). Eighty-one representative epileptic syndromes and familial seizures, in which causal mutations were confirmed, are listed in the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) (see Table 1).
Table 1.

A list of 81 human epilepsy syndromes and familiar febrile seizuers confirmed causal gene mutations

OMIM-I.D.Epielpsy syndrome or familial seizuresHuman CytobandGene symbol
# 609056 AMISH INFANTILE EPILEPSY SYNDROME2p11.2 SIAT9
# 610003 CEROID LIPOFUSCINOSIS, NEURONAL, 8, NORTHERN EPILEPSY VARIANT8p23.3 CLN8
# 610042 CORTICAL DYSPLASIA-FOCAL EPILEPSY SYNDROME7q35–q36CNTNAP2
# 121200 EPILEPSY, BENIGN NEONATAL, 1, AND/OR MYOKYMIA20q13.33 KCNQ2
# 607681 EPILEPSY, CHILDHOOD ABSENCE, SUSCEPTIBILITY TO, 2; ECA25q34 GABRG2
# 612269 EPILEPSY, CHILDHOOD ABSENCE, SUSCEPTIBILITY TO, 5; ECA515q12 GABRB3
# 611942EPILEPSY, CHILDHOOD ABSENCE, SUSCEPTIBILITY TO, 6; ECA616p13.3CACNA1H
# 615400 EPILEPSY, FAMILIAL ADULT MYOCLONIC, 5; FAME51q32.1 CNTN2
# 604364 EPILEPSY, FAMILIAL FOCAL, WITH VARIABLE FOCI; FFEVF22q12.2–q12.3 DEPDC5
# 600512 EPILEPSY, FAMILIAL TEMPORAL LOBE, 1; ETL110q23.33 LGI1
# 614417 EPILEPSY, FAMILIAL TEMPORAL LOBE, 5; ETL58q13.2 CPA6
# 245570 EPILEPSY, FOCAL, WITH SPEECH DISORDER AND WITH OR WITHOUT MENTAL RETARDATION; FESD16p13.2 GRIN2A
# 613060 EPILEPSY, IDIOPATHIC GENERALIZED, SUSCEPTIBILITY TO, 10; EIG101p36.33 GABRD
# 607628 EPILEPSY, IDIOPATHIC GENERALIZED, SUSCEPTIBILITY TO, 11; EIG113q27.1 CLCN2
# 614847 EPILEPSY, IDIOPATHIC GENERALIZED, SUSCEPTIBILITY TO, 12; EIG121p34.2 SLC2A1
# 611136 EPILEPSY, IDIOPATHIC GENERALIZED, SUSCEPTIBILITY TO, 13; EIG135q34GABRA1
# 612899EPILEPSY, IDIOPATHIC GENERALIZED, SUSCEPTIBILITY TO, 8; EIG83q21.1 CASR
# 607682 EPILEPSY, IDIOPATHIC GENERALIZED, SUSCEPTIBILITY TO, 9; EIG92q23.3 CACNB4
# 607631EPILEPSY, JUVENILE ABSENCE, SUSCEPTIBILITY TO, 1; EJA16p12.2 EFHC1
# 611136 EPILEPSY, JUVENILE MYOCLONIC, SUSCEPTIBILITY TO, 55q34 GABRA1
# 607682 EPILEPSY, JUVENILE MYOCLONIC, SUSCEPTIBILITY TO, 62q23.3 CACNB4
# 607628 EPILEPSY, JUVENILE MYOCLONIC, SUSCEPTIBILITY TO, 8CLCN2
# 254770EPILEPSY, MYOCLONIC JUVENILE; EJM6p12.2EFHC1
# 600513 EPILEPSY, NOCTURNAL FRONTAL LOBE, 1; ENFL120q13.33CHRNA4
# 605375 EPILEPSY, NOCTURNAL FRONTAL LOBE, 3; ENFL31q21.3CHRNB2
# 610353 EPILEPSY, NOCTURNAL FRONTAL LOBE, 4; ENFL48p21.2 CHRNA2
# 615005EPILEPSY, NOCTURNAL FRONTAL LOBE, 5; ENFL59q34.3KCNT1
# 612437 EPILEPSY, PROGRESSIVE MYOCLONIC 1B; EPM1B12q12 PRICKLE1
# 254780 EPILEPSY, PROGRESSIVE MYOCLONIC 2A (LAFORA)6q24.3EPM2A
# 254780 EPILEPSY, PROGRESSIVE MYOCLONIC 2B (LAFORA)6p22.3 NHLRC1
# 611726 EPILEPSY, PROGRESSIVE MYOCLONIC 3, WITH OR WITHOUT INTRACELLULAR INCLUSIONS; EPM37q11.21KCTD7
# 254900EPILEPSY, PROGRESSIVE MYOCLONIC 4, WITH OR WITHOUT RENAL FAILURE; EPM44q21.1 SCARB2
# 613832 EPILEPSY, PROGRESSIVE MYOCLONIC 5; EPM53p14.1PRICKLE2
# 614018EPILEPSY, PROGRESSIVE MYOCLONIC 6; EPM617q21.32 GOSR2
# 266100 EPILEPSY, PYRIDOXINE-DEPENDENT; EPD5q23.2ALDH7A1
# 300491EPILEPSY, X-LINKED, WITH VARIABLE LEARNING DISABILITIES AND BEHAVIOR DISORDERSXp11.23 SYN1
# 615369 EPILEPTIC ENCEPHALOPATHY, CHILDHOOD-ONSET; EEOC15q26.1 CHD2
# 308350 EPILEPTIC ENCEPHALOPATHY, EARLY INFANTILE, 1; EIEE1Xp21.3 ARX
# 613402 EPILEPTIC ENCEPHALOPATHY, EARLY INFANTILE, 10; EIEE1019q13.33PNKP
# 613721 EPILEPTIC ENCEPHALOPATHY, EARLY INFANTILE, 11; EIEE112q24.3 SCN2A
# 613722 EPILEPTIC ENCEPHALOPATHY, EARLY INFANTILE, 12; EIEE1220p12.3PLCB1
# 614558 EPILEPTIC ENCEPHALOPATHY, EARLY INFANTILE, 13; EIEE1312q13.13 SCN8A
# 614959 EPILEPTIC ENCEPHALOPATHY, EARLY INFANTILE, 14; EIEE149q34.3 KCNT1
# 615006 EPILEPTIC ENCEPHALOPATHY, EARLY INFANTILE, 15; EIEE151p34.1 ST3GAL3
# 615338 EPILEPTIC ENCEPHALOPATHY, EARLY INFANTILE, 16; EIEE1616p13.3 TBC1D24
# 615473EPILEPTIC ENCEPHALOPATHY, EARLY INFANTILE, 17; EIEE1716q12.2 GNAO1
# 615476EPILEPTIC ENCEPHALOPATHY, EARLY INFANTILE, 18; EIEE181p34.2 SZT2
# 615744EPILEPTIC ENCEPHALOPATHY, EARLY INFANTILE, 19; EIEE195q34 GABRA1
# 300672 EPILEPTIC ENCEPHALOPATHY, EARLY INFANTILE, 2; EIEE2Xp22.13 CDKL5
# 615859 EPILEPTIC ENCEPHALOPATHY, EARLY INFANTILE, 23; EIEE231p31.3 DOCK7
# 609304 EPILEPTIC ENCEPHALOPATHY, EARLY INFANTILE, 3; EIEE311p15.5 SLC25A22
# 612164 EPILEPTIC ENCEPHALOPATHY, EARLY INFANTILE, 4; EIEE49q34.11STXBP1
# 613477 EPILEPTIC ENCEPHALOPATHY, EARLY INFANTILE, 5; EIEE59q34.11 SPTAN1
# 607208 EPILEPTIC ENCEPHALOPATHY, EARLY INFANTILE, 6; EIEE62q24.3SCN1A
# 607208 EPILEPTIC ENCEPHALOPATHY, EARLY INFANTILE, 6; EIEE62q24.3 SCN9A
# 613720 EPILEPTIC ENCEPHALOPATHY, EARLY INFANTILE, 7; EIEE720q13.33KCNQ2
# 300607 EPILEPTIC ENCEPHALOPATHY, EARLY INFANTILE, 8; EIEE8Xq11.1–q11.2 ARHGEF9
# 300088 EPILEPTIC ENCEPHALOPATHY, EARLY INFANTILE, 9; EIEE9Xq22.1 PCDH19
# 614418 FEBRILE SEIZURES, FAMILIAL, 11; FEB118q13.2 CPA6
# 613863FEBRILE SEIZURES, FAMILIAL, 3B2q24.3 SCN9A
# 604352 FEBRILE SEIZURES, FAMILIAL, 4; FEB45q14.3 GPR98
# 609446 GENERALIZED EPILEPSY AND PAROXYSMAL DYSKINESIA; GEPD10q22.3 KCNMA1
# 604233GENERALIZED EPILEPSY WITH FEBRILE SEIZURES PLUS, TYPE 1; GEFSP119q13.12 SCN1B
# 604403GENERALIZED EPILEPSY WITH FEBRILE SEIZURES PLUS, TYPE 2; GEFSP22q24.3 SCN1A
# 611277GENERALIZED EPILEPSY WITH FEBRILE SEIZURES PLUS, TYPE 3; GEFSP35q34 GABRG2
# 613060 GENERALIZED EPILEPSY WITH FEBRILE SEIZURES PLUS, TYPE 5, GEFSP51p36.33 GABRD
# 613863GENERALIZED EPILEPSY WITH FEBRILE SEIZURES PLUS, TYPE 7; GEFSP72q24.3 SCN9A
# 300419 MENTAL RETARDATION, X-LINKED, WITH OR WITHOUT SEIZURES, ARX-RELATED; MRXARXXp21.3 ARX
# 614231 MICROCEPHALY, EPILEPSY, AND DIABETES SYNDROME; MEDS18q21.1 IER3IP1
# 254800 MYOCLONIC EPILEPSY OF UNVERRICHT AND LUNDBORG21q22.3 CSTB
# 605021 MYOCLONIC EPILEPSY, FAMILIAL INFANTILE; FIME16p13.3 TBC1D24
# 254770MYOCLONIC EPILEPSY, JUVENILE, SUSCEPTIBILITY TO, 1, INCLUDED6p12.2 EFHC1
# 611087 POLYHYDRAMNIOS, MEGALENCEPHALY, AND SYMPTOMATIC EPILEPSY; PMSE17q23.3 STRADA
# 614501 PSYCHOMOTOR RETARDATION, EPILEPSY, AND CRANIOFACIAL DYSMORPHISM; PMRED1p34.3 SNIP1
# 300643ROLANDIC EPILEPSY, MENTAL RETARDATION, AND SPEECH DYSPRAXIA, X-LINKED; RESDXXq22.1SRPX2
# 605751 SEIZURES, BENIGN FAMILIAL INFANTILE, 2; BFIS216p11.2 PRRT2
# 607745 SEIZURES, BENIGN FAMILIAL INFANTILE, 3; BFIS32q24.3 SCN2A
# 121200 SEIZURES, BENIGN FAMILIAL NEONATAL, 1; BFNS120q13.33 KCNQ2
# 121201 SEIZURES, BENIGN FAMILIAL NEONATAL, 2; BFNS28q24.22 KCNQ3
# 612780 SEIZURES, SENSORINEURAL DEAFNESS, ATAXIA, MENTAL RETARDATION, AND ELECTROLYTE IMBALANCE; SESAMES1q23.2 KCNJ10
# 159950 SPINAL MUSCULAR ATROPHY WITH PROGRESSIVE MYOCLONIC EPILEPSY; SMAPME8p22 ASAH1

This list only displays the epileptic diseases that contain “epilepsy” or “febrile seizures” in its name. Data extaction from the online Mendelian inheritance in man (OMIM) was done on 8 July 2014.

This list only displays the epileptic diseases that contain “epilepsy” or “febrile seizures” in its name. Data extaction from the online Mendelian inheritance in man (OMIM) was done on 8 July 2014. Two keywords, epileptogenesis and epilepsy biomarkers, are regarded as the essential clues for overcoming epilepsy. Epileptogenesis is defined as the gradual process by which epilepsy develops in normal brain following initial brain insults or gene mutations. Numerous clinical and preclinical studies demonstrate that therapeutic intervention to suppress epileptogenesis is an attractive new strategy for prevention and treatment of epilepsy. The biomarker subgroup for the London Workshop of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) defined ‘epilepsy biomarker’ as summarized in Table 2 [22].
Table 2.

Values of epilepsy biomarkers in epileptogenesis and ictogenesis

1.to predict the development of an epilepsy condition
2.to identify the presence of tissue capable of generating spontaneous seizures
3.to measure progression after the condition is established
4.to be used to create animal models for more cost-efficient screening of potential antiepileptogenic and antiseizure drugs and devices
5.to reduce the cost of clinical trials of potential antieipleptogenic interventions by enriching the trial population with patients at high risk for developing epilepsy

Quotation from the report of the biomarker subgroup in ILAE London Workshop [22]; Ictogenesis, The process by which the brain develops seizures; Epileptogenesis, The process by which the brain develops epilepsy.

Quotation from the report of the biomarker subgroup in ILAE London Workshop [22]; Ictogenesis, The process by which the brain develops seizures; Epileptogenesis, The process by which the brain develops epilepsy. Genetic epileptic models have been reported in mice, gerbils, rats, dogs, baboons and chickens [61]. If epileptic animals or seizure-susceptible animals were found in stocks, the epileptic traits were usually genetically-fixed by selective breeding. So far, genetically established mice and rat strains have been preferentially used for epilepsy research [24]. The laboratory rats (Rattus norvegicus) has a suitable size for behavior studies, surgical manipulations, multichannel electroencephalographic recordings, separate brain tissue sampling, continuous blood sampling or body fluid monitoring. With efforts of the rat genetic and genomic research community [1], highly polymorphic genetic markers, microsatellite markers [97], and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers [91], genetic linkage maps [97, 122], and genome sequences of more than 27 inbred rat strains have been prepared [11]. More than 650 genetically defined rat strains, including epileptic rats, are now available from the National BioResource Project − Rat (NBRP-Rat) in Japan [98]. Once the causal gene mutations were identified in epileptic patients, experimental studies about functional changes were conducted in vitro, ex vivo or in vivo using mutated cells and/or mutant mice or rats. A zebra fish model for Dravet syndrome (or severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy (SMEI)) was also developed for screening of novel AEDs [12]. Genome-editing technology has been rapidly improved in most laboratory animals including rats. Considering the future research aims, such as for understanding ictogenesis, epileptogenesis and discovery of epilepsy biomarkers, we expect that rats will become a more useful species in the epilepsy research. Existing epileptic rat models, which were developed by two paths ‘phenotype to gene’ and ‘gene to phenotype’ (Fig. 1), are summarized in Table 3.
Fig. 1.

Two paths used to develop epileptic rat strains. KURMA, Kyoto University Rat Mutant Archive; ICSI, intra cytoplasmic sperm injection; Black-filled arrows, showing the process used in the development of the epileptic rats listed in Table 3; opened arrows, showing the process which will be used in the near future.

Table 3.

Genetic rat models of epilepsy

StrainsSeizure types/modelsCausative gene mutationsSpontaneous or induced mutationsMajor pathological findings in CNS
(A) Established by inbreeding combined with selection
GAERS/MaveAbsensePolygenes, Cacna1h, R1584PSpontaneousNone

WAG/RijAbsensePolygenicSpontaneousNone

WERAbsence, Tonic-clonicUnknownSpontaneousNone

IER/IhrTonic-clonic Chr8, Chr15 for cataractSpontaneousNeuronal microdysgenesis in hipocamopus

NER/KyoTonic-clonic OligogenicSpontaneousNone

SER/KyoAbsense, Tonic, Tonic-clonictm (a genomic deletion*), zi (mutated Atrn)Spontaneouscrossing of two mutantsSpongiform degeneration

TRM/KyoAbsensetmSpontaneousSpongiform degeneration

GEPR-3, GEPR-9AudiogenicUnknownSpontaneousNone

(B) Generated by chemical mutagenesis
• Phenotype-driven

GRY/IdrEA2Cacna1a, M251KMNUReduction in size of the cerebellum

F344-Adms/KyoEA1 (ADMS rat)Kcna1, T925AENUNone

• Gene-driven

F344-Lgi1m1KyoADLTELgi1, L385RENUNone

F344-Scn1am1KyoFebrile seizures (Hiss rat)Scn1a, N1417HENUNone

*The mutant gene tm is a genomic deletion spanning approximately 240kb, including at least Shpk (partial), Trpv1, Trpv3, Aspa, Spata3, and 7 Olr genes.

Two paths used to develop epileptic rat strains. KURMA, Kyoto University Rat Mutant Archive; ICSI, intra cytoplasmic sperm injection; Black-filled arrows, showing the process used in the development of the epileptic rats listed in Table 3; opened arrows, showing the process which will be used in the near future. *The mutant gene tm is a genomic deletion spanning approximately 240kb, including at least Shpk (partial), Trpv1, Trpv3, Aspa, Spata3, and 7 Olr genes. In the present review, causal mutations and genetic bases of each epileptic rat strain are mainly described, and future prospects on rat models for epilepsy research are added in the last paragraph. A list of abbreviations of antiepileptic drugs and epilepsy related words in this review is presented in Table 4.
Table 4.

Abbreviations of antiepileptic drugs and epilepsy related words in this review

Antiepileptic drugsEpilepsy related words
CBZ, carbamazepinADLTE, autosomal dominant lateral temporal epilepsy
CLB, clobazam AEDs, antiepileptic drugs
CZP, clonazepamAGS, audiogenic seizures
DZP, diazepamEA1, episodic ataxia type 1
ESM, ethosuximideEA2, episodic ataxia type 2
LTG, lamotrigineGTCS, generalized tonic clonic seizures
LEV, levetiracetamILAE, The International League Against Epilepsy
PB, phenobarbitalSMEI, severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy
PHT, phenytoinSWD, spike-and-wave discharge
TMO, trimethadioneTLE, human temporal lobe epilepsy
ZNS, zonisamide
VPA, valproate

Audiogenic Seizure Models: GEPR-3 and GEPR-9

According to the report of Griffiths, it was already known around 1940 that loud sounds of high frequency have a profound effect on the behavior of laboratory rats [29]. The sounds produce in the rats a high state of excitement characterized by wild undirected running and culminating in a convulsive seizure. In all instances the rats were derived from common strains which have been bred and raised under laboratory conditions for many generations

GEPR-3 and GEPR-9

Dailey and Jobe established two colonies of genetically epilepsy-prone rats (GEPR) [18]. Virtually all of the animals in the first colony experience a wild running fit that terminates in a generalized clonic convulsion when they are stimulated by sound. According to their convulsion intensity scoring system, these animals have audiogenic response score (ARS) of 3 and the colony was designated the GEPR-3 colony. In the second colony, more than 95% of the rats experience a wild running phase terminating in a tonic extensor convulsion by sound stimulation. The rats have an ARS of 9 and the colony was designated the GEPR-9 colony. The GEPR-3 and GEPR-9 rats both show incomplete penetrance and variable expressivity of the underlying genetic predisposition [60]. Therefore, genetic analysis of quantitative trait loci (QTL) for seizures has not been reported yet. Faingold et al. summarize that susceptibility to the audiogenic seizures (AGS) is associated with the “two hit hypothesis” of genetic predisposition plus environmental insult to the brain, as proposed for human epilepsy. In GEPR-9s the first hit is a genetic defect in GABA-mediated inhibition, and the second hit is an intense acoustic stimulus, which initiates AGS. The neuronal network for AGS in GEPR-9s is confined exclusively to the brain stem, including the lower brainstem primary auditory nuclei, but forebrain structures are not required for AGS [23].

Absence Seizures Models: GAERS and WAG/Rij

In 1977, Robinson and Gilmore originally reported spontaneous occurrence of generalized epileptiform discharge in the electroencephalograms (EEG) of some male Charles River CD albino rats. These discharges, 6-10Hz spike-and-wave discharges (SWD), occurred during periods of quite wakefulness and were accompanied by locomotors arrest and often by mild clonic facial movement. Subsequently, it has become apparent that these phenomena are not restricted to the subpopulation. Identical abnormalities have been also found in tracings Wistar and Lewis rats [88].

GAERS

While working on pharmacological models of experimental epilepsy in rats, Vergnes et al. observed spontaneously occurring recurrent electroclinical paroxysmal phenomena in some naive animals. They conclude that the reported phenomenon demonstrates similarities with other experimental models of human petit mal epilepsy and could become valid for further research [119]. Marescaux et al. have selected a strain of rats and designated it the Genetic Absence Epilepsy Rat from Strasbourg (GAERS). In this strain, 100% of the animals present recurrent generalized non-convulsive seizures characterized by bilateral and synchronous SWD accompanied with behavioral arrest, staring and sometimes twitching of the vibrissae. Usually, spontaneous 7–11 Hz SWD start and end abruptly on a normal background EEG, during a state of quiet wakefulness [66]. The variable expression of SWD in offspring from GAERS × control reciprocal crosses may be due to the existence of multiple genes. Using F2 progenies derived from GAERS and BN rats, Rudolf et al. identified QTLs influencing SWD intermediate phenotypes in rat chromosome (Chr) 4, 7, and 8 [89]. Surprisingly, a homozygous, missense, single nucleotide (G to C) mutation in the Cav3.2 T-type Ca2+ channel gene has been reported in GAERS, although the gene Cacna1h is located in rat Chr 10q12. The GAERS Cav3.2 mutation produces an arginine to proline (R1584P) substitution in exon 24 of Cacna1h, encoding a portion of the III–IV linker region in Cav3.2. This mutation segregates codominantly with the number of seizures and time in seizure activity in progeny of an F1 intercross. Two major thalamic Cacna1h splice variants were also identified, either with or without exon 25. The mutation introduced into the splice variants acts “epistatically,” requiring the presence of exon 25 to produce significantly faster recovery from channel inactivation and greater charge transference during high-frequency bursts [86].

WAG/Rij

While studying the sleep-wake characteristics of WAG/Rij, van Luijtelaar and Coenen discovered two types of aberrant discharges, SWD type-1 (7.5–9.5 Hz, polarity of spikes upward, duration of 3–4 sec) and SWD type-2 (8 Hz, polarity of spikes downward, duration of ~1 sec), spontaneously occurring in the cortical EEG [116]. In the parental strains, WAG/Rij and ACI (a control rat strain with no signs of epilepsy), reciprocal WAG/Rij × ACI F1 hybrids, F2, B1, and B2 generations, the number and duration of SWD were determined. One hundred percent of the F1 animals showed SWD, while the percentages for the F2, B1, and B2 generations were 79, 95, and 37%, respectively. The results suggest that one dominant gene determines the occurrence, while others manipulate the number and duration of epileptic phenomena [84]. Gauguier et al. studied the genetic basis of the EEG properties of these SWDs using (WAG/Rij × ACI) F2 rats, and identified two QTLs, T1swd/wag for controlling the average duration of SWD type-1 in rat Chr 5 and T2swd/wag for the total duration of SWD type-2 in Chr 9, respectively [27]. Hyperpolarization-activated, cyclic nucleotide–gated (HCN) channels contribute to cationic Ih current in neurons and regulate the excitability of neuronal networks. Nava et al. recently found de novo HCN1 point mutations in individuals who had clinical features resembling those of the Dravet syndrome with progression toward atypical absences, intellectual disability and autistic traits [77]. In WAG/Rij, the HCN1 channel down-regulation occurred temporally before the development onset of SWD in the dendrites of cortical L5 neurons and at a cellular level, HCN1 played a direct role in promoting dendritic Ca2+ electrogenesis and burst firing [57]. Genetic factors involved in HCN1 down-regulation in WAG/Rij have not been elucidated yet.

GAERS and WAG/Rij

Akman et al. reported that WAG/Rij has significant differences compared with GAERS in the number, mean duration, cumulative duration and frequency of SWD and in the spectral characteristics of the pre-SWD [3]. Increased Cav3.2 expression and increased T-type currents were detected in GAERS as well as WAG/Rij [86], although primal gene mutations in WAG/Rij have not been clarified yet. Neurophysiologic and signal analytical studies in WAG/Rij and GAERS demonstrated that the SWD originated from the deep layers of the somatosensory cortex quickly spread over the cortex and invade the thalamus, and that the reticular thalamic nucleus and other thalamic nuclei provide a resonance circuitry for the amplification, spreading and entrainment of SWD [117]. Ethosuximide (ESM) is a first-line clinical symptomatic treatment for absence seizures. Russo et al. have demonstrated that chronic treatment with ESM as well as levetiracetam (LEV), a broad-spectrum AED with antiabsence and antiepileptogenic properties, when initiated prior to the onset of the epilepsy, has antiepileptogenic effects in WAG/Rij [90], and Dezsi et al. also reported that ESM reduced epileptogenesis and behavioral comorbidity, such as anxiety-like behavior, in GAERS [19]. Recently, van Luijtelaar and Zobeiri review the progress and outlooks in WAG/Rij as well as GAERS, as the two best characterized genetic animal models for absence epilepsy [118].

Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizure Models: IER, NER and WER

IER

Ihara found that some of Ihara’s cataract rats showed GTCS in the form of major attacks. From the original mating between a male rat with severe seizures and its female littermates, selective inbreeding was repeated for more than 30 generations. Spontaneous epileptic seizures, including generalized convulsions, occur in almost all of the male rats, without any external stimuli, by approximately 5 months after birth [5]. Linkage analysis indicated that Catil on Chr 8 would be involved in the occurrence of cataract, and Cati2 on Chr 15 in the timing of onset of the cataract, respectively [126]. In every IER examined, there were invariable and fundamental neuropathological findings consisting of abnormal neuronal clusters in the CA1 of the hippocampal formation. Moreover, disarrangement of neuronal cells, such as dispersion and gaps in lamination of pyramidal neurons, were observed. These changes were thought to represent genetically programmed lesions, neuronal microdysgenesis, because they were common findings in 2-month-old with neither abnormal behaviors nor any seizure activity. The neuronal microdysgenesis in the hippocampal formation of IER was considered to have an intimate relationship with epileptogenesis and/or an enhancement of seizure susceptibility [113]. Arai et al. reported that the pattern of up- and down regulation of a variety of genes in the hippocampus of IER in comparison to control Wistar rats [9]. However, the gene mutation which is involved to the genetically programmed lesions has not been elucidated yet. Miura et al. reported the results of chronic 5-day treatment with clobazam (CLB), clonazepam (CZP), and zonisamide (ZNS) in IERs. Although both CLB and ZNS reduced the daily and total incidence of GTCS during treatment, CZP could not prevent the appearance of GTCS at all. Clinical features of the AEDs against human temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) were fitted to their efficacies against GTCS in IERs, supporting the predictability of IERs for the novel drugs against refractory human limbic seizures in TLE [72].

NER

Noda et al. found 4 rats (3 females and one male) that spontaneously showed generalized tonic clonic seizures (GTCS) in a group of Crj:Wistar rats purchased from Charles River Japan in 1985. By brother-sister mating of rats with frequent seizures, Noda epileptic rat (NER) was established as an inbred strain (F29, 1977) [78]. Although NERs usually exhibit spontaneous GTCS from about 14 weeks of age with a frequency about one per 30h, Iida et al. have found that NERs given a modified acoustic priming, that is, repeated weekly sound stimulation from 3 weeks of age, had a high incidence (100%) of AGS from 9 weeks of age [44]. Under tossing-stimulating conditions, GTCS were provoked in 90% of NER and 66% of (F1 × NER) backcross animals, but no seizures occurred in the F344, F1, or (F1 × F344) backcross animals. Routine monitoring of nonstimulated animals revealed spontaneous GTCS in 100% of NER and 64.2% of (F1 × NER) backcross animals, but no seizures in F344 or F1 animals. Gender effect on seizure susceptibility was negligible in (F1 × NER) backcross for both conditions. Seizure susceptibility loci, designated Ner1 and Ner2, have been mapped on rat Chr 1 and Chr 3, respectively. It is speculated that Ner1 controls the inheritance of spontaneous tonic-clonic seizures in an autosomal recessive mode, whereas Ner2 affects the occurrence of tossing-induced seizures [65]. Ohno et al. suggested that GTCS in NER are of forebrain origin and are evoked primarily by activation of the limbic and/or cortical seizure circuits [80]. Many researches support that hippocampus plays an important role in epileptogenicity in NER [34, 54, 83, 106]. On the other hand, Harada et al. reported that astrocytic Kir4.1 expression of NERs was markedly reduced in the amygdala in a subunit- and region-specific manner, specifically in astrocytic processes. Although it remains to be determined if the Kir4.1 down-regulation in NERs could be a primary cause or a consequence of seizure activity, their results suggest that reduced activity of Kir4.1 channels in the amygdala is involved in limbic hyperexcitability in NER [39]. Ishimaru et al. reported the antiepileptic effects of LEV on hippocampal kindling in NERs [49], and Inoue et al. also showed inhibition effects of traditional AEDs, phenobarbital (PB) and valproate (VPA), against seizures evoked by strong environmental stimuli in mature NERs [45].

WER

Tsubota et al. found a new epileptic rat showing absence-like immobile behavior and head droop implying neck flaccidity in a Kwl:Wistar colony purchased from Kiwa Laboratory Animals Co., Ltd. (Wakayama, Japan) in 1993. They started inbreeding between the mutant male and normal females of the same colony to develop a new strain. After the F2 generation, affected rats spontaneously exhibited both absence-like immobile behavior with SWD in cortical EEG and GTCS. The GTCS in WER strain established was confirmed to be inherited as an autosomal recessive trait with 86% incidence [112].

Canavan-Disease Related Epileptic Models: TRM and SER

According to the report of Traeger and Rabin, some 38 of 60 children of Canavan disease, a white matter disorder with aspartoacylase (ASPA) deficiency, had epilepsy and the age of onset was quite variable, from birth to 15 years. Thirty children were treated with AEDs, and good control was attained in 18 children [111].

TRM

Serikawa et al. found mutant rats that exhibit body tremor, curled whiskers and hair in a colony of Kyo:Wistar in 1985. The rats aged 2–3 months showed paroxysmal and synchronized 5–7 Hz SWD in both cortical and hippocampal EEG during absence-like seizures [99]. The tremor rats were established as a segregating inbred strain TRM, in which the causative mutation tremor (tm) is maintained in heterozygous state by brother × sister matings. TRM (tm/tm) exhibited also spongiform degeneration in the central nervous system (CNS) and sterility with gonadal hypoplasia in both sexes. Although genetic analysis suggested that absence-like seizures are semidominant traits [43], the other anomalies were regarded to be a set of inherited autosomal recessive traits. By positional cloning, tm has been identified as a genomic deletion in Chr 10q24. The centromere-proximal end of the deleted region was mapped inside the 7th exon of sedoheptulokinase (Shpk), and the centromere-distal end was located within a LINE1 element downstream of Olr1472. Within the determined 240-kb deleted region, entire transcribed regions of 12 genes besides part of the 7th exon of Shpk were localized: transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 and 3 (Trpv1/3); Aspa; the Spata22 ortholog; seven olfactory receptor genes; and one hypothetical gene, LOC100359760 [50]. Accordingly, no ASPA expression was detected in any of the tissues examined, and abnormal accumulation of N-acetyl-L-aspartate (NAA) was shown in the mutant brain, in correlation with the severity of the vacuole formation [53]. Elevated urine NAA, a biomarker, was also detected in tremor rats, although the details were not described in the publication. Since then, tremor rats have been used as a valuable rat model of the Canavan disease [13, 55, 120]. In addition, effects of ASPA gene transfer to the brain of tremor rats were pathophysiologically evaluated [56, 70]. Interestingly, direct injection of NAA into normal rat cerebroventricle induced 4- to 10-Hz polyspikes or spike-wave-like complexes in cortical and hippocampal EEG, concomitantly with behavior characterized by sudden immobility and staring [2]. Actually NAA produced an activation of acutely dissociated hippocampal neurons via metabotropic glutamate receptors [123]. NAA has been also found to activate hippocampal CA3 neurons in brain slice preparations of Wistar rats [31]. Furthermore, adenovirus gene transfer of ASPA into the cerebroventicle of tremor rats inhibited absence-like seizures [95]. These results suggested that accumulated NAA in the CNS would induce neuroexcitation and neurodegeneration directly or indirectly. Hanaya et al. examined the effects of conventional AEDs on absence-like seizures in tremor rats. Trimethadione (TMO), ESM, and PB effectively inhibited the seizures, whereas phenytoin (PHT) was ineffective. The profiles on effects of conventional AEDs were similar to those observed in human absence seizures [37].

SER

The Zitter rat, which is characterized by a hair anomaly, generalized body tremor, progressive flaccid paresis, hypomyelination and vacuole formation in the CNS, was found in a colony of SD rats in Hannover, Germany. By positional cloning, Kuramoto et al. found a marked decrease in Attractin (Atrn) mRNA in the brain of the rats and identified the zitter mutation (zi) as an 8-bp deletion at a splice donor site of Atrn [59]. The double mutant, termed spontaneously epileptic rat (SER; zi/zi, tm/tm), was obtained in an F2 progeny between the two mutant strains, zitter rats and tremor heterozygous rats, and has been maintained by intercrossing between individuals with zi/zi, tm/+ genotype among the litter mates of SER [100]. SER exhibited spontaneously and frequently both absence-like seizures and tonic convulsive seizures, and running and/or jumping episodes after the termination of tonic convulsion were also observed without any stimuli. Double mutant mice carrying both homozygous Aspa-knockout and Atrn mutant alleles exhibited both absence-like and tonic seizures [28], supporting that both Aspa and Atrn deficiencies would be responsible for epileptic seizures in SER. Actually adenovirus gene transfer of ASPA into the cerebroventricle of SER results in an inhibition of tonic convulsions [96]. The seizure inhibition effects of various existing AEDs to the two types of seizures of SER suggested that absence seizures and tonic seizures are independently able to be evaluated with specificity. The absence-like seizures were inhibited by TMO and ESM, whereas the tonic convulsion was not affected by these AEDs. In contrast, PHT inhibited the tonic seizures without affecting the absence-like seizures. PB and VPA inhibited both seizures. SER is therefore regarded to be a powerful tool for evaluating AEDs [94]. Since then, SERs have been used for evaluating other AEDs and candidates; TRH [114], CNK-602A (TRH-related analogue) [73, 87], topiramate [38, 52, 76], 20-hydroxyecdysone (neurosteroid) [33], vigabatrin [35], S-312-d (novel calcium channel antagonist) [6]. Significantly longer inhibition of seizures after prolonged treatment with LEV compared with that of PHT, PB, VPA, and carbamazepin (CBZ) suggested that LEV possesses not only antiseizure effects but also antiepileptogenic properties [17, 32, 124, 125]. SER and the parental mutant strains, TRM (tm/tm) and ZI (Zitter inbred strain, zi/zi), have morphological changes in the CNS [46, 58] which would be mostly caused by primal gene mutations. In addition, acquired morphological changes would be added in SER, since the rats exhibit frequently both absence and convulsive seizures. Hippocampal CA3 neurons in SER display a long-lasting depolarization shift accompanied by repetitive firing, which was attributed to abnormalities of the L-type Ca2+ channels, with a single stimulation of the mossy fibers [4, 7, 48, 74]. Sprouting of mossy fibers was observed in the dentate of mature SER, and expression of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) was higher in the hilus, CA3, and in the granular cell layer of the dentate gyrus in SER than in normal Wistar rats. Repetitive tonic seizures and vulnerable CA3 neurons of SER could be involved in the induction of sclerosis-like changes in the hippocampus [36]. The hippocampal sclerosis-like neuronal degeneration and/or regeneration was inhibited by prophylactic treatment with LEV [104]. In addition to abnormalities of the Ca2+ channels described above, functional alterations induced by repeated seizures in SER were also studied in GABAA receptor [25], benzodiazepine receptor [101], NMDA receptor [71], muscarinic cholinergic receptor [75], and voltage-gated sodium channels subtypes [30], and for contents of neuropeptides [92, 105]. Aberrant reduction in inhibitory protein factor (IPF), which potently inhibits glutamate uptake into synaptic vesicles, was found in hippocampus of aged SER, suggesting the seizures are involved in excessive glutamate transmission [8]. Although SER exhibit retardation in learning ability, their poor operant performance was improved by continual intake of PB in the rats [10], suggesting the importance of seizure control. Comparative studies on the morphological and functional changes with or without the continuous suppression of seizures in SER might give new clues for suppression of epileptogenesis and prevention of pathophysiological changes.

Chemical Mutagenesis Derived Models: Febrile Seizure, ADLTE, EA1, and EA2 Models

Chemical mutagenesis is a powerful strategy to produce genetically modified mutations in many species. We have generated a large repository of N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU)-induced mutations, called the Kyoto University Rat Mutant Archive (KURMA). DNA mutations in the repository can be efficiently screened with a high-throughput and low-cost assay based on the Mu-transposition reaction (MuT-POWER). Animals carrying any mutations can be recovered from frozen sperm by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) [69]. There are estimated to be 2.5–3.5 million mutations in the KURMA, which results in a genome-wide average of at least two mutations per gene within 10,000 stored DNA/sperm samples. In addition, 250 sets of sperm and DNA from Hubrecht ENU Rat Archive (HERA) which was derived from Msh6 KO rats (HsdCpb:WU) [115], are integrated into the NBRP-Rat repository [98].

Febrile seizure model: Hiss rat, missense mutant of Scn1a gene, F344-Scn1am1Kyo

Although febrile seizures (FS) are the most common convulsive syndrome in infants and childhood, the etiology of FS has remained unclarified. Various missense mutations of the Nav1.1 channel (SCN1A), which alter channel properties, have been reported in a familial syndrome of generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus (GEFS+). Scn1a-targeted rats carrying a missense mutation (N1417H) in the third pore region of the sodium channel were developed by gene-driven ENU mutagenesis. Despite their normal appearance under ordinary circumstances, Scn1a mutant rats exhibited remarkably high susceptibility to hyperthermia-induced seizures. Experimental studies with the mutant rats showed that the missense mutation (N1417H) confers susceptibility to FS, suggesting that the impaired physiological functions of inhibitory GABAergic neurons underlie one of the mechanisms of FS [68, 79, 82]. The Scn1a homozygous mutant rats are named as hyperthermia-induced seizure susceptible (Hiss) rats. Hiss rats were used for evaluating FS-specific AEDs. Diazepam (DZP) and potassium bromide (Kbr) showed potent inhibitory effects whereas CBZ exhibited adverse effects [41].

Autosomal-dominant lateral temporal lobe epilepsy (ADLTE) model: Missense mutant of Lgi1 gene, F344-Lgi1m1Kyo

Mutations of the leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 (LGI1) gene cause an autosomal dominant partial epilepsy with auditory features also known as autosomal-dominant lateral temporal lobe epilepsy (ADLTE). LGI1 encodes a neuronal secreted protein, whose brain function is still poorly understood. Lgi1-mutant rats carrying a missense mutation (L385R) were generated by gene-driven ENU mutagenesis. Experimental studies with the mutant rats showed that the L385R mutation prevents the secretion of LGI1 protein and the mutant protein may be destabilized in vivo. Homozygous mutant rats Lgi1 exhibited early-onset spontaneous epileptic seizures from P10 and died prematurely, and heterozygous Lgi1 rats were more susceptible to sound-induced, generalized tonic-clonic seizures than control rats. The AGS were suppressed by AEDs such as CBZ, PHT and LEV, which are commonly used to treat partial seizures, but not by the specific absence seizure drug, ESM [16]. To acoustic stimuli in heterozygous Lgi1 rats, an elevated level of Fos expression, a biomarker of neural excitation, was found in the CNS, especially in the temporal lobe, thalamus, and subthalamic nucleus. In addition, a number of differentially expressed genes that may be involved in epileptogenesis were found by microarray analysis [26].

Episodic ataxia type 1 (EA1) model: ADMS rats, missense mutant of Kcna1 gene, F344-Adms/Kyo

Mutations in the KCNA1 gene, which encodes for the α subunit of the voltage-gated potassium channel Kv1.1, cause episodic ataxia type 1 (EA1). EA1 is a dominant human neurological disorder characterized by variable phenotypes of brief episodes of ataxia, myokymia, neuromyotonia, and associated epilepsy. In a stock of ENU-mutated G1 rats, some rats, which dominantly exhibit myokymia, neuromyotonia and generalized tonic-clonic seizures, were found and maintained by selective breeding. Ishida et al. identified a missense mutation (S309T) in the voltage-sensor domain, S4, of the Kcna1 gene as a causal mutation by positional cloning. Heterozygous Kcna1 mutant rats as named autosomal dominant myokymia and seizures (ADMS) rats showed cold stress-induced tremor, neuromyotonia, and motor incoordination. Expression studies of homomeric and heteromeric Kv1.1 channels suggested a dominant-negative effect of the S309T mutation on potassium channel function. Spontaneous convulsive seizures and twitching phenotypes in ADMS rats were significantly prevented after the administration of CBZ. ADMS rats would be a unique model for studying the diverse functions of Kv1.1 in vivo, as well as for understanding the pathology of EA1. Homozygous Kcna1 mutant rats showed tremor, motor-incoordination, mainly caused by the extension of hind limbs, and spontaneous convulsive seizures from postnatal two weeks, and died until three weeks of age [47].

Episodic ataxia type 2 (EA2) model: GRY rats, missense mutant of Cacna1a gene

Takeuchi et al. found a new mutant rat displaying abnormal movement in the progeny of a female Wistar rat which had been given 10 mg/kg MNU at an early stage of the gestational period [107]. Genetic studies revealed that the character is inherited by an autosomal single recessive gene and named groggy rat. The abnormal movement of the groggy rats was first apparent around postnatal day 15, while the histological studies revealed the appearance of numerous necrotic neurons in the striatum of the groggy rat on postnatal days 60 and 120. Tokuda et al. confirmed that the established GRY inbred strain exhibit ataxia, an unstable gait, and paroxysmal severe extension of the entire body. Adult rats show a reduction in size of the cerebellum and presynaptic and axon terminal abnormalities of Purkinje cells. These neurological abnormalities are inherited in an autosomal recessive manner, and a missense (M251K) mutation in the alpha (1A) subunit of the P/Q-type voltage-gated Ca2+ channel gene Cacna1a was identified by positional cloning. This mutation was located at a highly conserved site close to the ion-selective pore and led to the shortening of the inactivation phase of the Ca2+ channel current without a change of peak current density or current-voltage relationship in whole cell patch recordings of the recombinant Ca2+channel expressed in HEK cells. GRY rats exhibited absence-like seizures from 6 to 8 weeks of age, which were characterized by bilateral and synchronous 7–8 Hz SWD concomitant with sudden immobility and staring, on cortical and hippocampal EEGs. The pharmacological profile of the seizures was similar to that of human absence epilepsy: the seizures were inhibited by ESM, VPA and LEV but not PHT [109, 110]. Tanaka et al. suggest that increased high-voltage-activated (HVA) Ca2+ channel function underlies the cerebellar dysfunction and ataxic phenotype of GRY rats [108]. Ohno et al. also suggest that the serotonergic system negatively regulates the incidence of absence seizures in GRY rats by stimulation of 5-HT (1A) and 5-HT (2) receptor [81]. Although CACN1A mutations are associated with three neurological disorders in humans, familial hemiplegic migraine type 1 (FHM1), episodic ataxia type 2 (EA2), and spinocerebellar ataxia type 6 (SCA6), the missense mutations found in familial EA2 patients affected are located at S5-S6 linker in domain I, very close to the position of the mutation in GRY rats. Therefore, GRY rats would be used as a model specialized for the investigation of EA2 [109].

Future Prospects on Development of Rat Models for Epilepsy Research

To defeat drug-resistant epilepsy, development of drug resistant epilepsy models has been considered. Originally, both amygdala and hippocampal kindling models are proposed as models of TLE in AED screening [121]. Löscher et al. reported the differences in kindling development in outbred and inbred rats strains [62], and they showed that PHT-resistant kindled rats were possible to be divided from the population of kindled Wistar rats [21, 51, 64]. As another models of drug-resistant epilepsy, lamotrigine (LTG)-resistant kindled Sprague-Dawley rats were also reported [85, 102]. These results suggest that drug-resistant kindled inbred strains would be possible to develop from selective inbreeding. The recombinant inbred (RI) strains would be also a useful model system to find seizure-susceptible genes which are involved in epileptogenesis. Although it was a preliminary trial, we succeeded to identify two QTLs, which are involved in the development of amygdala kindling, on rat Chr 2 by using a set of LE (LE/Stm) X F (F344/Stm)/FXL-RI strains, and several positional candidate genes, such as Hspb3, Itgal, Itgae, and Plk2, were raised from the restricted regions [40]. To identify genes involved in the development/expression of anxiety/fear, Díaz-Morán et al. analyzed the gene expression profile in the hippocampus of genetically heterogeneous NIH-HS rats [20]. The strategy, combined sequence-based and genetic mapping analysis of the complex traits in outbred rats [14], might be suitable for the identification of genes involved in the development of kindling. There is a report that EEGs are non-sufficient biomarkers for the prediction of pharmacoresistant epilepsy. Additional factors such as etiology and pathophysiology should also be taken into consideration [103]. Since neurophysiological and imaging tools have been rapidly improved, new epilepsy biomarkers employing such tools may be developed in the coming years and become clinical routine [42]. Studies focused on the discovery of epilepsy biomarkers except for the EEG monitoring were not evident on the epileptic rat models yet. However, established epileptic rat models would be appropriate tools in identifying biomarkers that may be worth for clinical use. In the present review, we introduced the ENU-induced mutant rat archive (KURMA), especially gene-driven mutagenesis, with two epileptic rat models as the outcome. Recently, advanced gene editing technologies, such as zinc finger nuclease (ZFN) [67], transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALEN) [93], and the clustered interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/Cas system, an RNA-based genome engineering technique [127], have become available in the rat. Therefore, a variety of novel rat models with similar mutations as those in epileptic patients is likely to be developed in the near future. We expect that the research activities with epileptic rat models will be successfully processed toward better treatment and prevention of this disease.
  127 in total

1.  Accumulation of N-acetyl-L-aspartate in the brain of the tremor rat, a mutant exhibiting absence-like seizure and spongiform degeneration in the central nervous system.

Authors:  K Kitada; T Akimitsu; Y Shigematsu; A Kondo; T Maihara; N Yokoi; T Kuramoto; M Sasa; T Serikawa
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.372

2.  Anticonvulsant efficacy of gabapentin and levetiracetam in phenytoin-resistant kindled rats.

Authors:  W Löscher; E Reissmüller; U Ebert
Journal:  Epilepsy Res       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.045

Review 3.  Epilepsy biomarkers.

Authors:  Jerome Engel; Asla Pitkänen; Jeffrey A Loeb; F Edward Dudek; Edward H Bertram; Andrew J Cole; Solomon L Moshé; Samuel Wiebe; Frances E Jensen; Istvan Mody; Astrid Nehlig; Annamaria Vezzani
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.864

4.  Epileptic seizures induced by N-acetyl-L-aspartate in rats: in vivo and in vitro studies.

Authors:  T Akimitsu; K Kurisu; R Hanaya; K Iida; Y Kiura; K Arita; H Matsubayashi; K Ishihara; K Kitada; T Serikawa; M Sasa
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2000-04-07       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Adenoviral gene transfer of aspartoacylase ameliorates tonic convulsions of spontaneously epileptic rats.

Authors:  Takahiro Seki; Hiroaki Matsubayashi; Taku Amano; Kazuhiro Kitada; Tadao Serikawa; Masashi Sasa; Norio Sakai
Journal:  Neurochem Int       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.921

Review 6.  Genetic animal models of epilepsy as a unique resource for the evaluation of anticonvulsant drugs. A review.

Authors:  W Löscher
Journal:  Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1984-09

7.  Epileptic seizures in rats homozygous for two mutations, zitter and tremor.

Authors:  T Serikawa; J Yamada
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  1986 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.645

8.  Changes of NMDA receptor binding in spontaneously epileptic rat and parent strains.

Authors:  I Mitsuyoshi; M Ito; Y Shirasaka; H Mikawa; T Serikawa; J Yamada
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.996

9.  The spontaneously epileptic rat (SER), a zitter*tremor double mutant rat: histopathological findings in the central nervous system.

Authors:  T Inui; T Yamamura; H Yuasa; Y Kawai; A Okaniwa; T Serikawa; J Yamada
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1990-05-28       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Drug screening in Scn1a zebrafish mutant identifies clemizole as a potential Dravet syndrome treatment.

Authors:  Scott C Baraban; Matthew T Dinday; Gabriela A Hortopan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  5 in total

1.  Methodological standards and interpretation of video-electroencephalography in adult control rodents. A TASK1-WG1 report of the AES/ILAE Translational Task Force of the ILAE.

Authors:  Shilpa D Kadam; Raimondo D'Ambrosio; Venceslas Duveau; Corinne Roucard; Norberto Garcia-Cairasco; Akio Ikeda; Marco de Curtis; Aristea S Galanopoulou; Kevin M Kelly
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 5.864

2.  l-Homocarnosine, l-carnosine, and anserine attenuate brain oxidative damage in a pentylenetetrazole-induced epilepsy model of ovariectomized rats.

Authors:  Xudong Pan; Chen Zhang; Ziyou Qi; Xiangli Yu; Peng Xu; Yongnan Hao
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 3.  The α2δ Subunit and Absence Epilepsy: Beyond Calcium Channels?

Authors:  Roberta Celli; Ines Santolini; Michela Guiducci; Gilles van Luijtelaar; Pasquale Parisi; Pasquale Striano; Roberto Gradini; Giuseppe Battaglia; Richard T Ngomba; Ferdinando Nicoletti
Journal:  Curr Neuropharmacol       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 7.363

4.  Seizure Detection and Network Dynamics of Generalized Convulsive Seizures: Towards Rational Designing of Closed-Loop Neuromodulation.

Authors:  Puneet Dheer; Ganne Chaitanya; Diana Pizarro; Rosana Esteller; Kaushik Majumdar; Sandipan Pati
Journal:  Neurosci J       Date:  2017-12-13

Review 5.  Pathophysiology of Trans-Synaptic Adhesion Molecules: Implications for Epilepsy.

Authors:  Adam Gorlewicz; Leszek Kaczmarek
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2018-09-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.