| Literature DB >> 25311244 |
T Okeyo-Owuor1, B S White2, R Chatrikhi3, D R Mohan1, S Kim1, M Griffith4, L Ding4, S Ketkar-Kulkarni1, J Hundal4, K M Laird3, C L Kielkopf3, T J Ley2, M J Walter1, T A Graubert1.
Abstract
We previously identified missense mutations in the U2AF1 splicing factor affecting codons S34 (S34F and S34Y) or Q157 (Q157R and Q157P) in 11% of the patients with de novo myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Although the role of U2AF1 as an accessory factor in the U2 snRNP is well established, it is not yet clear how these mutations affect splicing or contribute to MDS pathophysiology. We analyzed splice junctions in RNA-seq data generated from transfected CD34+ hematopoietic cells and found significant differences in the abundance of known and novel junctions in samples expressing mutant U2AF1 (S34F). For selected transcripts, splicing alterations detected by RNA-seq were confirmed by analysis of primary de novo MDS patient samples. These effects were not due to impaired U2AF1 (S34F) localization as it co-localized normally with U2AF2 within nuclear speckles. We further found evidence in the RNA-seq data for decreased affinity of U2AF1 (S34F) for uridine (relative to cytidine) at the e-3 position immediately upstream of the splice acceptor site and corroborated this finding using affinity-binding assays. These data suggest that the S34F mutation alters U2AF1 function in the context of specific RNA sequences, leading to aberrant alternative splicing of target genes, some of which may be relevant for MDS pathogenesis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25311244 PMCID: PMC4391984 DOI: 10.1038/leu.2014.303
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Leukemia ISSN: 0887-6924 Impact factor: 11.528
Figure 1Overexpression of U2AF1 (S34F) alters the distribution of known and novel splice junctions
Expression of splice junctions from RNA-seq of primary human CD34+ cells transfected with either WT or S34F mutant U2AF1. (a) Known splice junctions. (b, c and d) Novel splice junctions: (b) Known splice acceptor/donor in novel combination; (c) Novel splice acceptor/Known splice donor sites; (d) Known splice acceptor/Novel splice donor sites. Numbers in each panel indicate significantly altered (FDR<5%) splice junctions with a | log2(fold change) | >2.
Figure 5Recurrent missense mutations in U2AF1 have specific effects on alternative splicing
(a) U2AF1 mRNA expression was increased >10-fold in cells transfected with WT or mutant alleles, compared to MIG control. Error bars (too small to visualize) represent SD of 3 technical replicates; repeated in 3 biological replicates for each construct with similar results. (b) Exogenous Flag-tagged U2AF1 protein abundance of the different mutants in 293T cells compared with MIG empty vector control. Numbers beneath the blot are the sum of U2AF1- Flag and endogenous U2AF1 values in each case, normalized to MIG, obtained by densitometry analysis. (c) The U2AF1 S34 mutants (S34F>S34Y) increased exon skipping in the GH1 minigene. Exon skipping was decreased by the Q157R mutant, and unaffected with an allele containing both mutations (S34F/Q157R), compared to WT U2AF1. (d) Similar mutation- specific effects were seen with cryptic splicing of the FMR1 minigene. (e) Exon skipping of endogenous DEK was increased by the U2AF1 mutants relative to WT in 293T cells but decreased by the S34Y, S34F/Q157R and Q157R mutants, compared to the S34F mutant. The splicing ratio (b/total) = expression of isoform b/(the sum of the expression of isoforms a and b). The mean +/− SD of 3 replicates are shown; repeated in 3 separate experiments with similar results. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.