| Literature DB >> 25309929 |
Hoyoun Won1, Jung-Sun Kim2, Dong-Ho Shin2, Byeong-Keuk Kim2, Young-Guk Ko2, Donghoon Choi2, Yangsoo Jang3, Myeong-Ki Hong3.
Abstract
PURPOSES: The serial changes in neointimal tissues were compared between everolimus-eluting stent (EES) and bare-metal stent (BMS) in the porcine coronary artery using optical coherence tomography (OCT).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25309929 PMCID: PMC4182891 DOI: 10.1155/2014/851676
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Representative optical coherence tomographic images of neointima. Homogeneous pattern (a) and layered pattern (b).
Quantitative coronary angiographic and optical coherence tomographic findings of the entire stent segment at 1, 3, and 6 months after stent implantation.
| Bare-metal stent ( | Everolimus-eluting stent ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | 3 months | 6 months | 1 month | 3 months | 6 months | |
| Quantitative coronary angiography analyses | ||||||
| Proximal reference, mm | 2.7 (2.6–3.1) | 2.8 (2.6–3.2) | 2.8 (2.5–3.2) | 2.9 (2.7–3.2) | 3.0 (2.6–3.1) | 2.7 (2.4–3.1) |
| Distal reference, mm | 2.6 (2.4–2.8) | 2.6 (2.3–3.0) | 2.5 (2.2–2.9) | 2.6 (2.4–2.8) | 2.5 (2.4–2.7) | 2.5 (2.3–2.7) |
| Minimal lumen diameter, mm | 2.2 (2.0–2.5) | 2.2 (2.1–2.4) | 2.2 (2.0–2.4) | 2.4 (2.0–2.6)∗ | 1.7 (1.4–2.3) | 1.8 (1.5–2.2) |
| Optical coherence tomography findings | ||||||
| Neointimal thickness, | 190.4 (127.0–243.9) | 182.2 (131.9–229.4) | 169.8 (112.7–211.1) | 120.6 (93.8–203.9)∗ | 276.5 (172.2–428.1) | 269.6 (199.9–396.4) |
| Stent area, mm2 | 6.1 (5.2–6.8) | 6.1 (5.4–7.0) | 6.0 (5.2–6.8) | 6.2 (5.3–6.9) | 6.3 (5.4–7.0) | 6.3 (5.0–6.9) |
| Lumen area, mm2 | 4.5 (3.8–5.6) | 4.7 (4.0–5.4) | 4.6 (3.8–5.3) | 4.9 (4.1–5.8)∗ | 3.8 (3.0–4.9) | 3.8 (3.2–4.5) |
| Neointimal area, mm2 | 1.6 (1.1–1.9) | 1.4 (1.0–1.9) | 1.4 (0.9–1.7) | 1.3 (0.9–1.7)∗ | 2.5 (1.4–3.6) | 2.4 (1.6–3.1) |
| Percentage of neointimal hyperplasia area, % | 25.3 (19.2–29.4) | 23.9 (17.3–32.0) | 23.2 (13.1–29.9) | 21.5 (12.9–28.1)∗ | 39.1 (24.1–53.7) | 35.4 (31.7–45.0) |
*P < 0.05, using Friedman tests.
Figure 2Serial changes in neointimal volume at the segment with maximal amounts of neointimal hyperplasia at the 1-month follow-up.
Optical coherence tomographic findings of the maximum neointima site at 1, 3, and 6 months after stent implantation.
| Bare-metal stent ( | Everolimus-eluting stent ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | 3 months | 6 months | 1 month | 3 months | 6 months | |
| Quantitative analyses | ||||||
| Stent volume, mm3 | 24.5 (21.4–27.4) | 24.3 (21.8–26.9) | 23.3 (21.4–26.5) | 25.5 (20.7–27.2) | 25.5 (20.4–27.6) | 24.7 (19.9–27.9) |
| Lumen volume, mm3 | 16.7 (14.1–20.2) | 17.5 (15.7–20.6) | 17.6 (14.4–20.8) | 18.7 (16.5–21.4) | 12.6 (11.5–17.6) | 15.5 (13.3–18.3) |
| Neointima volume, mm3 | 7.3 (4.7–8.4) | 6.9 (4.6–8.2) | 6.4 (4.3–7.4) | 4.8 (4.1–7.6) | 9.8 (5.7–15.1) | 8.6 (6.0–11.2) |
| Qualitative analyses | ||||||
| Homogeneous, % | 12 (80.0) | 14 (93.3)∗ | 15 (100) | 11 (73.3) | 5 (33.3) | 12 (80.0) |
| Layered, % | 3 (20.0) | 1 (6.7)∗ | 0 (0) | 4 (26.7) | 10 (66.7) | 3 (20.0) |
*P < 0.05, comparing bare-metal stent with everolimus-eluting stent.
Figure 3Serial changes in neointimal patterns at the segment with maximal amounts of neointimal hyperplasia at the 1-month follow-up. BMS, bare-metal stent; EES, everolimus-eluting stent.
Figure 4Evolution of serial changes in neointimal patterns in bare-metal stent and everolimus-eluting stent.
Figure 5Examples of neointimal volume and patterns at the segment with maximal amounts of neointimal hyperplasia at 1, 3, and 6 months following bare-metal stent implantation. NIH, neointimal hyperplasia.
Figure 6Examples of neointimal volume and patterns at the segment with maximal amounts of neointimal hyperplasia at 1, 3, and 6 months following everolimus-eluting stent implantation. NIH, neointimal hyperplasia.