Literature DB >> 23784878

System for verifiable CT radiation dose optimization based on image quality. part I. Optimization model.

David B Larson1, Lily L Wang, Daniel J Podberesky, Marilyn J Goske.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop and validate a mathematical radiation dose optimization model for computed tomography (CT) of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This quality improvement project was determined not to constitute human subject research. A model for measuring water-equivalent diameter (DW) based on the topogram was developed and validated on each axial section in eight CT examinations of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis (500 images). A model for estimating image noise and size-specific dose estimates (SSDEs) using image and metadata was developed and validated in 16 examinations of anthropomorphic phantoms. A model to quantify radiologist image quality preferences was developed and applied to evaluations of 32 CT examinations of the abdomen and pelvis by 10 radiologists. The scanners' dose modulation algorithms were modeled and incorporated into an application capable of prediction of image noise and SSDE over a range of patient sizes. With use of the application, protocol techniques were recommended to achieve specific image noise targets. Comparisons were evaluated by using two-tailed nonpaired and paired t tests.
RESULTS: The mean difference between topogram- and axial-based DW estimates was -3.5% ± 2.2 (standard deviation). The mean difference between estimated and measured image noise and volume CT dose index on the anthropomorphic phantoms was -6.9% ± 5.5 and 0.8% ± 1.8, respectively. A three-dimensional radiologist image quality preference model was developed. For the prediction model validation studies, mean differences between predicted and actual effective tube current-time product, SSDE, and estimated image noise were -0.9% ± 9.3, -1.8% ± 10.6, and -0.5% ± 4.4, respectively.
CONCLUSION: CT image quality and radiation dose can be mathematically predicted and optimized on the basis of patient size and radiologist-specific image noise target curves. © RSNA, 2013.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23784878     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13122320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  13 in total

1.  Prospective estimation of organ dose in CT under tube current modulation.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Tian; Xiang Li; W Paul Segars; Donald P Frush; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Dynamic Volume Computed Tomography Imaging of the Upper Airway in Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Authors:  Robert J Fleck; Stacey L Ishman; Sally R Shott; Ephraim J Gutmark; Keith B McConnell; Mohamed Mahmoud; Goutham Mylavarapu; Dhananjay R Subramaniam; Rhonda Szczesniak; Raouf S Amin
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 4.062

3.  Optimizing CT radiation dose based on patient size and image quality: the size-specific dose estimate method.

Authors:  David B Larson
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-10-11

4.  Size-based quality-informed framework for quantitative optimization of pediatric CT.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei; Xiang Li; Donald P Frush
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-08-21

5.  Evaluating the appropriateness of dosimetric indices in body CT.

Authors:  Gianluca Valeri; Silvia Cegna; Alberto Mari; Luigi La Riccia; Giovanni Mazzoni; Stefania Maggi; Andrea Giovagnoni
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Pediatric CT quality management and improvement program.

Authors:  David B Larson; Lior Z Molvin; Jia Wang; Frandics P Chan; Beverley Newman; Dominik Fleischmann
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-10-11

Review 7.  Design for Additive Bio-Manufacturing: From Patient-Specific Medical Devices to Rationally Designed Meta-Biomaterials.

Authors:  Amir A Zadpoor
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Compliance with AAPM Practice Guideline 1.a: CT Protocol Management and Review - from the perspective of a university hospital.

Authors:  Timothy P Szczykutowicz; Robert K Bour; Myron Pozniak; Frank N Ranallo
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Size-based protocol optimization using automatic tube current modulation and automatic kV selection in computed tomography.

Authors:  Robert D MacDougall; Patricia L Kleinman; Michael J Callahan
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Is It Better to Enter a Volume CT Dose Index Value before or after Scan Range Adjustment for Radiation Dose Optimization of Pediatric Cardiothoracic CT with Tube Current Modulation?

Authors:  Hyun Woo Goo
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.