Anurag Gupta1, Ali S Raja2, Ivan K Ip3, Ramin Khorasani4. 1. Center for Evidence-Based Imaging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Brookline, MA; Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. Electronic address: anuraggz@gmail.com. 2. Center for Evidence-Based Imaging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Brookline, MA; Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. 3. Center for Evidence-Based Imaging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Brookline, MA; Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. 4. Center for Evidence-Based Imaging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Brookline, MA; Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Validate the sensitivity and specificity of 2 age adjustment strategies for d-dimer values in identifying patients at risk for pulmonary embolism (PE) compared with traditional D-dimer cutoff value (500 ng/mL) to decrease inappropriate computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) use. METHODS: This institutional review board-approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant retrospective study included all adult emergency department patients evaluated for PE over a 32-month period (1/1/11-8/30/13). Only patients undergoing CTPA and D-dimer testing were included. We used a validated natural language processing algorithm to parse CTPA radiology reports and determine the presence of acute PE. Outcome measures were sensitivity and specificity of 2 age-adjusted D-dimer cutoffs compared with the traditional cutoff. We used χ2 tests with proportional analyses to assess differences in traditional and age-adjusted (age×10 ng/mL) D-dimer cutoffs, adjusting both by decade and by year. RESULTS: A total 3063 patients with suspected PE were evaluated by CTPA during the study period, and 1055 (34%) also received d-dimer testing. The specificity of age-adjusted D-dimer values was similar or higher for each age group studied compared with traditional cutoff, without significantly compromising sensitivity. Overall, had decade age-adjusted cutoffs been used, 37 CTPAs could have been avoided (19.6% of 189 patients aged >60 years with Wells score≤4); had yearly age-adjusted cutoffs been used, 52 CTPAs (18.2% of 286 patients aged >50 years with Wells score≤4) could have been avoided. CONCLUSION: Each age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff strategy for the evaluation of PE was associated with increased specificity and statistically insignificant decreased sensitivity when compared with the traditional D-dimer cutoff value.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Validate the sensitivity and specificity of 2 age adjustment strategies for d-dimer values in identifying patients at risk for pulmonary embolism (PE) compared with traditional D-dimer cutoff value (500 ng/mL) to decrease inappropriate computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) use. METHODS: This institutional review board-approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant retrospective study included all adult emergency department patients evaluated for PE over a 32-month period (1/1/11-8/30/13). Only patients undergoing CTPA and D-dimer testing were included. We used a validated natural language processing algorithm to parse CTPA radiology reports and determine the presence of acute PE. Outcome measures were sensitivity and specificity of 2 age-adjusted D-dimer cutoffs compared with the traditional cutoff. We used χ2 tests with proportional analyses to assess differences in traditional and age-adjusted (age×10 ng/mL) D-dimer cutoffs, adjusting both by decade and by year. RESULTS: A total 3063 patients with suspected PE were evaluated by CTPA during the study period, and 1055 (34%) also received d-dimer testing. The specificity of age-adjusted D-dimer values was similar or higher for each age group studied compared with traditional cutoff, without significantly compromising sensitivity. Overall, had decade age-adjusted cutoffs been used, 37 CTPAs could have been avoided (19.6% of 189 patients aged >60 years with Wells score≤4); had yearly age-adjusted cutoffs been used, 52 CTPAs (18.2% of 286 patients aged >50 years with Wells score≤4) could have been avoided. CONCLUSION: Each age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff strategy for the evaluation of PE was associated with increased specificity and statistically insignificant decreased sensitivity when compared with the traditional D-dimer cutoff value.
Authors: Ivan K Ip; Louise I Schneider; Richard Hanson; Dana Marchello; Patricia Hultman; Michael Viera; Brian Chiango; Katherine P Andriole; Andrew Menard; Susan Schade; Steven E Seltzer; Ramin Khorasani Journal: J Am Coll Radiol Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: Ali S Raja; Ivan K Ip; Luciano M Prevedello; Aaron D Sodickson; Cameron Farkas; Richard D Zane; Richard Hanson; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Ritu R Gill; Ramin Khorasani Journal: Radiology Date: 2011-12-20 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: M Carrier; M Righini; P S Wells; A Perrier; D R Anderson; M A Rodger; S Pleasance; G Le Gal Journal: J Thromb Haemost Date: 2010-06-07 Impact factor: 5.824
Authors: Christine Haase; Maja Joergensen; Christina Ellervik; Mikala Klok Joergensen; Lise Bathum Journal: Thromb Res Date: 2013-09-29 Impact factor: 3.944
Authors: Henrike J Schouten; G J Geersing; H L Koek; Nicolaas P A Zuithoff; Kristel J M Janssen; Renée A Douma; Johannes J M van Delden; Karel G M Moons; Johannes B Reitsma Journal: BMJ Date: 2013-05-03
Authors: Kenneth Iwuji; Hasan Almekdash; Kenneth M Nugent; Ebtesam Islam; Briget Hyde; Jonathan Kopel; Adaugo Opiegbe; Duke Appiah Journal: J Prim Care Community Health Date: 2021 Jan-Dec