D J Warren1, S Matthews. 1. Radiology Department, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield NHS Teaching Hospitals Trust, Sheffield, UK. Daniel.Warren@sth.nhs.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The simplified Wells pre-test probability scoring algorithm for pre-investigation evaluation of pulmonary emboli (PE) is a commonly utilised and validated assessment tool. We sought to identify whether use of a dichotomised scoring system altered the overall negative predictive value (NPV) in patients referred for CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) assessment of suspected PE. METHODS: Prospective data collection of all patients referred for CTPA evaluation of suspected acute PE during a 3 year period was carried out. Pre-test risk stratification was performed according to simplified Wells criteria in conjunction with plasma d-Dimer (Bio-Pool and IL test) estimation. Retrospective dichotomisation was also performed. RESULTS: 2531 patients were investigated for suspected acute PE; acute thromboemboli were confirmed in 22.7%. The overall NPV for negative d-Dimer and intermediate pre-test probability (PTP) was 98.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 96.3-99.7%]; with retrospective dichotomisation, the NPV for the PE unlikely group was 99.0% (95% CI 94.8-99.8%). Implementation of dichotomised scoring, excluding PE unlikely with negative d-Dimer cases from further imaging, would have yielded a 4% reduction in CTPA referral pathway imaging at our institution. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate no significant difference between exclusion in the intermediate subgroup and the retrospectively dichotomised PE unlikely group and demonstrate the high negative predictive power of the Bio-Pool and IL tests in conjunction with the Wells PTP tool. Prior to implementation of new guidelines for exclusion of patients with suspected PE from further imaging, hospitals should audit their own practice and validate the d-Dimer assay utilised at their institution.
OBJECTIVES: The simplified Wells pre-test probability scoring algorithm for pre-investigation evaluation of pulmonary emboli (PE) is a commonly utilised and validated assessment tool. We sought to identify whether use of a dichotomised scoring system altered the overall negative predictive value (NPV) in patients referred for CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) assessment of suspected PE. METHODS: Prospective data collection of all patients referred for CTPA evaluation of suspected acute PE during a 3 year period was carried out. Pre-test risk stratification was performed according to simplified Wells criteria in conjunction with plasma d-Dimer (Bio-Pool and IL test) estimation. Retrospective dichotomisation was also performed. RESULTS: 2531 patients were investigated for suspected acute PE; acute thromboemboli were confirmed in 22.7%. The overall NPV for negative d-Dimer and intermediate pre-test probability (PTP) was 98.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 96.3-99.7%]; with retrospective dichotomisation, the NPV for the PE unlikely group was 99.0% (95% CI 94.8-99.8%). Implementation of dichotomised scoring, excluding PE unlikely with negative d-Dimer cases from further imaging, would have yielded a 4% reduction in CTPA referral pathway imaging at our institution. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate no significant difference between exclusion in the intermediate subgroup and the retrospectively dichotomised PE unlikely group and demonstrate the high negative predictive power of the Bio-Pool and IL tests in conjunction with the Wells PTP tool. Prior to implementation of new guidelines for exclusion of patients with suspected PE from further imaging, hospitals should audit their own practice and validate the d-Dimer assay utilised at their institution.
Authors: Paul D Stein; Pamela K Woodard; John G Weg; Thomas W Wakefield; Victor F Tapson; H Dirk Sostman; Thomas A Sos; Deborah A Quinn; Kenneth V Leeper; Russell D Hull; Charles A Hales; Alexander Gottschalk; Lawrence R Goodman; Sarah E Fowler; John D Buckley Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Robbert J Goekoop; Neeltje Steeghs; Rene W L M Niessen; Gé J P M Jonkers; Hans Dik; Ad Castel; Lies Werker-van Gelder; L Tom Vlasveld; Rik C J van Klink; Erwin V Planken; Menno V Huisman Journal: Thromb Haemost Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 5.249
Authors: Jan J Michiels; Alain Gadisseur; Marc van der Planken; Wilfried Schroyens; Marianne De Maeseneer; Jan T Hermsen; Paul H Trienekens; Henk Hoogsteden; Peter M P Pattynama Journal: Semin Thromb Hemost Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 4.180
Authors: Arne van Belle; Harry R Büller; Menno V Huisman; Peter M Huisman; Karin Kaasjager; Pieter W Kamphuisen; Mark H H Kramer; Marieke J H A Kruip; Johanna M Kwakkel-van Erp; Frank W G Leebeek; Mathilde Nijkeuter; Martin H Prins; Maaike Sohne; Lidwine W Tick Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-01-11 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Rene Quiroz; Nils Kucher; Kelly H Zou; Florian Kipfmueller; Philip Costello; Samuel Z Goldhaber; U Joseph Schoepf Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-04-27 Impact factor: 56.272