P L Harper1, E Theakston, J Ahmed, P Ockelford. 1. Department of Haematology, Palmerston North Hospital, Palmerston North, New Zealand. paul.harper@midcentral.co.nz
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The D-dimer assay is used as an exclusion test in the assessment of suspected venous thromboembolic disease; patients with a negative result have a low probability of thrombosis. We reviewed the D-dimer results from a hospital and community laboratory using the vidas D-dimer test to assess the influence of age on the D-dimer assay. METHODS: D-dimer results from 6631 unselected patients aged more than 16 years were analysed in four age groups and it was shown that the median D-dimer concentration increased with age (16-40 years, 294 ng/mL; 40-60 years, 387 ng/mL; 60-80 years; 854 ng/mL; >80 years, 1397 ng/mL). To test the effect of age on the assay specificity, a cohort of 1897 patients with suspected venous thromboembolic disease was analysed separately. Patients with a negative D-dimer were discharged without further investigation. Patients with a positive result and a clinical suspicion of thrombosis underwent further investigation. One hundred and sixty-five deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolus cases were identified. RESULTS: The assay specificity decreased with age from 70% in patients less than 40 years to below 5% in patients more than 80 years. Receiver operator curves were prepared for each age group and the effect of altering the threshold value was analysed. In patients 60-80 years old a threshold value of 1000 ng/mL increased assay specificity to 55% without loss of assay sensitivity. CONCLUSION: The vidas D-dimer assay with a threshold value of 500 ng/mL has little clinical value as an exclusion test in patients more than 80 years old. The assay specificity is poor (26%) in patients aged 60-80 years but could be improved by increasing the threshold value to 1000 ng/mL. We believe that this should be tested in a prospective trial.
BACKGROUND: The D-dimer assay is used as an exclusion test in the assessment of suspected venous thromboembolic disease; patients with a negative result have a low probability of thrombosis. We reviewed the D-dimer results from a hospital and community laboratory using the vidas D-dimer test to assess the influence of age on the D-dimer assay. METHODS: D-dimer results from 6631 unselected patients aged more than 16 years were analysed in four age groups and it was shown that the median D-dimer concentration increased with age (16-40 years, 294 ng/mL; 40-60 years, 387 ng/mL; 60-80 years; 854 ng/mL; >80 years, 1397 ng/mL). To test the effect of age on the assay specificity, a cohort of 1897 patients with suspected venous thromboembolic disease was analysed separately. Patients with a negative D-dimer were discharged without further investigation. Patients with a positive result and a clinical suspicion of thrombosis underwent further investigation. One hundred and sixty-five deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolus cases were identified. RESULTS: The assay specificity decreased with age from 70% in patients less than 40 years to below 5% in patients more than 80 years. Receiver operator curves were prepared for each age group and the effect of altering the threshold value was analysed. In patients 60-80 years old a threshold value of 1000 ng/mL increased assay specificity to 55% without loss of assay sensitivity. CONCLUSION: The vidas D-dimer assay with a threshold value of 500 ng/mL has little clinical value as an exclusion test in patients more than 80 years old. The assay specificity is poor (26%) in patients aged 60-80 years but could be improved by increasing the threshold value to 1000 ng/mL. We believe that this should be tested in a prospective trial.
Authors: Freddy Tita-Nwa; Angelo Bos; Abdul Adjei; William B Ershler; Dan L Longo; Luigi Ferrucci Journal: Aging Clin Exp Res Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 3.636
Authors: Renée A Douma; Melanie Tan; Roger E G Schutgens; Shannon M Bates; Arnaud Perrier; Cristina Legnani; Douwe H Biesma; Jeffrey S Ginsberg; Henri Bounameaux; Gualtiero Palareti; Marc Carrier; Gerben C Mol; Grégoire Le Gal; Pieter W Kamphuisen; Marc Righini Journal: Haematologica Date: 2012-04-17 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Ni Sun-Suslow; Elizabeth Pasipanodya; Erin Morgan; Maulika Kohli; Vanessa Serrano; Scott Letendre; Dilip V Jeste; David J Moore Journal: J Behav Med Date: 2020-02-18
Authors: Henrike J Schouten; H L Dineke Koek; Ruud Oudega; Geert-Jan Geersing; Kristel J M Janssen; Johannes J M van Delden; Karel G M Moons Journal: BMJ Date: 2012-06-06