Literature DB >> 30112074

Value of D-dimer levels for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: An analysis of 32 cases with computed tomography pulmonary angiography.

Hui Gao1,2, Hu Liu3, Yanjing Li2.   

Abstract

D-dimer levels correlate with the extent of pulmonary embolism (PE) on computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA), but the use of D-dimer alone for screening and diagnosing PE remains controversial. This study compared the utility of plasma D-dimer levels for diagnosing PE with that of CTPA (gold standard). This was a retrospective analysis of 32 consecutive patients with suspected PE at the Affiliated Hospital of Yan'an University between OctoberC 2010 and March 2011. Blood was sampled before thrombolytic therapy was administered. D-dimer levels were measured using an automatic system. CTPA was used to diagnose PE and was performed within 48 h of blood sampling using a Siemens Somatom Sensation 64 computed tomography (CT) scanner. ROC curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of D-dimer levels, with CTPA as the gold standard. Among the 32 patients, CTPA identified 26 patients with PE and 6 patients without obvious abnormality. Using a threshold value of 1.3 µg/ml for D-dimer level, the diagnosis of PE was achieved with a sensitivity of 96.2%, specificity of 50.0%, positive predictive value of 89.3%, negative predictive value of 75.0% and accuracy of 87.5%. D-dimer levels were significantly higher in patients positive for PE on CTPA than in those negative for PE on CTPA (9.85±7.14 vs. 2.82±2.65 µg/ml, P=0.001). Based on ROC curve analysis, the optimal threshold value for D-dimer level in the diagnosis of PE was 1.9 µg/ml. To conclude, D-dimer could be a simple, fast and inexpensive screening method for excluding a diagnosis of PE.

Entities:  

Keywords:  64-slice spiral computer tomography; D-dimer; pulmonary angiography; pulmonary embolism

Year:  2018        PMID: 30112074      PMCID: PMC6090438          DOI: 10.3892/etm.2018.6314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Ther Med        ISSN: 1792-0981            Impact factor:   2.447


  42 in total

1.  Incidence of venous thromboembolism: a community-based study in Western France. EPI-GETBP Study Group. Groupe d'Etude de la Thrombose de Bretagne Occidentale.

Authors:  E Oger
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.249

Review 2.  Phases of biomarker development for early detection of cancer.

Authors:  M S Pepe; R Etzioni; Z Feng; J D Potter; M L Thompson; M Thornquist; M Winget; Y Yasui
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-07-18       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  D-dimer for pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Grégoire Le Gal; Marc Righini; Philip S Wells
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Submassive pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Laurence W Busse; Jason S Vourlekis
Journal:  Crit Care Clin       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.598

5.  Pulmonary embolism: the weekend effect.

Authors:  Rahul Nanchal; Gagan Kumar; Amit Taneja; Jayshil Patel; Abhishek Deshmukh; Sergey Tarima; Elizabeth R Jacobs; Jeff Whittle
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 6.  Clinical validity of a negative computed tomography scan in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rene Quiroz; Nils Kucher; Kelly H Zou; Florian Kipfmueller; Philip Costello; Samuel Z Goldhaber; U Joseph Schoepf
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-04-27       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Samuel Z Goldhaber; Henri Bounameaux
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Cardiovascular risk factors and venous thromboembolism incidence: the longitudinal investigation of thromboembolism etiology.

Authors:  Albert W Tsai; Mary Cushman; Wayne D Rosamond; Susan R Heckbert; Joseph F Polak; Aaron R Folsom
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002-05-27

Review 9.  Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Clive Kearon
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Combination of a normal D-dimer concentration and a non-high pretest clinical probability score is a safe strategy to exclude deep venous thrombosis.

Authors:  R E G Schutgens; P Ackermark; F J L M Haas; H K Nieuwenhuis; H G Peltenburg; A H Pijlman; M Pruijm; R Oltmans; J C Kelder; D H Biesma
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-02-04       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Asia-Pacific venous thromboembolism consensus in knee and hip arthroplasty and hip fracture surgery: Part 1. Diagnosis and risk factors.

Authors:  Srihatach Ngarmukos; Kang-Il Kim; Siwadol Wongsak; Thanainit Chotanaphuti; Yutaka Inaba; Cheng-Fong Chen; David Liu
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2021-06-19

2.  The diagnostic value of D-dimer with simplified Geneva score (SGS) pre-test in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE).

Authors:  Zhihui Fu; Xibin Zhuang; Yueming He; Hong Huang; Weifeng Guo
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 1.637

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.