Literature DB >> 25295630

Large-angle x-ray scatter in Talbot-Lau interferometry for breast imaging.

Srinivasan Vedantham1, Linxi Shi, Andrew Karellas.   

Abstract

Monte Carlo simulations were used to investigate large-angle x-ray scatter at design energy of 25 keV during small field of view (9.6 cm × 5 cm) differential phase contrast imaging of the breast using Talbot-Lau interferometry. Homogenous, adipose and fibroglandular breasts of uniform thickness ranging from 2 to 8 cm encompassing the field of view were modeled. Theoretically determined transmission efficiencies of the gratings were used to validate the Monte Carlo simulations, followed by simulations to determine the x-ray scatter reaching the detector. The recorded x-ray scatter was classified into x-ray photons that underwent at least one Compton interaction (incoherent scatter) and Rayleigh interaction alone (coherent scatter) for further analysis. Monte Carlo based estimates of transmission efficiencies showed good correspondence [Formula: see text] with theoretical estimates. Scatter-to-primary ratio increased with increasing breast thickness, ranging from 0.11 to 0.22 for 2-8 cm thick adipose breasts and from 0.12 to 0.28 for 2-8 cm thick fibroglandular breasts. The analyzer grating reduced incoherent scatter by ~18% for 2 cm thick adipose breast and by ~35% for 8 cm thick fibroglandular breast. Coherent scatter was the dominant contributor to the total scatter. Coherent-to-incoherent scatter ratio ranged from 2.2 to 3.1 for 2-8 cm thick adipose breasts and from 2.7 to 3.4 for 2-8 cm thick fibroglandular breasts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25295630      PMCID: PMC4208689          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/21/6387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  40 in total

1.  Mammographic imaging with a small format CCD-based digital cassette: physical characteristics of a clinical system.

Authors:  S Vedantham; A Karellas; S Suryanarayanan; I Levis; M Sayag; R Kleehammer; R Heidsieck; C J D'Orsi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Multicontrast x-ray computed tomography imaging using Talbot-Lau interferometry without phase stepping.

Authors:  Nicholas Bevins; Joseph Zambelli; Ke Li; Zhihua Qi; Guang-Hong Chen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Phase-contrast X-ray imaging of breast.

Authors:  Jani Keyriläinen; Alberto Bravin; Manuel Fernández; Mikko Tenhunen; Pekka Virkkunen; Pekka Suortti
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.990

4.  Low-dose phase contrast mammography with conventional x-ray sources.

Authors:  A Olivo; S Gkoumas; M Endrizzi; C K Hagen; M B Szafraniec; P C Diemoz; P R T Munro; K Ignatyev; B Johnson; J A Horrocks; S J Vinnicombe; J L Jones; R D Speller
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  X-ray phase-contrast imaging of the breast--advances towards clinical implementation.

Authors:  S D Auweter; J Herzen; M Willner; S Grandl; K Scherer; F Bamberg; M F Reiser; F Pfeiffer; K Hellerhoff
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Mammography grid performance.

Authors:  P S Rezentes; A de Almeida; G T Barnes
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Clinical study in phase- contrast mammography: image-quality analysis.

Authors:  Renata Longo; Maura Tonutti; Luigi Rigon; Fulvia Arfelli; Diego Dreossi; Elisa Quai; Fabrizio Zanconati; Edoardo Castelli; Giuliana Tromba; Maria A Cova
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Performance of glass fiber antiscatter devices at mammographic energies.

Authors:  R Fahrig; J G Mainprize; N Robert; A Rogers; M J Yaffe
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Mammography with synchrotron radiation: first clinical experience with phase-detection technique.

Authors:  Edoardo Castelli; Maura Tonutti; Fulvia Arfelli; Renata Longo; Emilio Quaia; Luigi Rigon; Daniela Sanabor; Fabrizio Zanconati; Diego Dreossi; Alessando Abrami; Elisa Quai; Paola Bregant; Katia Casarin; Valentina Chenda; Ralf Hendrik Menk; Tatjana Rokvic; Alessandro Vascotto; Giuliana Tromba; Maria Assunta Cova
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Characterization of imaging performance in differential phase contrast CT compared with the conventional CT: spectrum of noise equivalent quanta NEQ(k).

Authors:  Xiangyang Tang; Yi Yang; Shaojie Tang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  3 in total

1.  Emerging Breast Imaging Technologies on the Horizon.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 1.875

2.  Towards standardization of x-ray beam filters in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: Monte Carlo simulations and analytical modelling.

Authors:  Suman Shrestha; Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  X-ray interferometry without analyzer for breast CT application: a simulation study.

Authors:  Jingzhu Xu; Kyungmin Ham; Joyoni Dey
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-03-26
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.