Literature DB >> 24007133

Low-dose phase contrast mammography with conventional x-ray sources.

A Olivo1, S Gkoumas, M Endrizzi, C K Hagen, M B Szafraniec, P C Diemoz, P R T Munro, K Ignatyev, B Johnson, J A Horrocks, S J Vinnicombe, J L Jones, R D Speller.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To provide an x-ray phase contrast imaging (XPCI) method working with conventional sources that could be readily translated into clinical practice. XPCI shows potential in synchrotron studies but attempts at translating it for use with conventional sources are subject to limitations in terms of field of view, stability, exposure time, and possibly most importantly, delivered dose.
METHODS: Following the adaptation of our "edge-illumination" XPCI technique for use with conventional x-ray sources through the use of x-ray masks, the authors have further modified the design of such masks to allow further reducing the dose delivered to the sample without affecting the phase sensitivity of the method.
RESULTS: The authors have built a prototype based on the new mask design and used it to image ex vivo breast tissue samples containing malignant lesions. The authors compared images acquired with this prototype to those obtained with a conventional system. The authors demonstrate and quantify image improvements, especially in terms of microcalcification detection. On calcifications detected also by the conventional system, the authors measure contrast increases from five to nine fold; calcifications and other features were also detected which are completely invisible in the conventional image. Dose measurements confirmed that the above enhancements were achieved while delivering doses compatible with clinical practice.
CONCLUSIONS: The authors obtained phase-related image enhancements in mammography by means of a system built with components available off-the-shelf that operates under exposure time and dose conditions compatible with clinical practice. This opens the way to a straightforward translation of phase enhanced imaging methods into clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24007133     DOI: 10.1118/1.4817480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  17 in total

1.  Clinical application of low-dose phase contrast breast CT: methods for the optimization of the reconstruction workflow.

Authors:  S Pacilè; F Brun; C Dullin; Y I Nesterest; D Dreossi; S Mohammadi; M Tonutti; F Stacul; D Lockie; F Zanconati; A Accardo; G Tromba; T E Gureyev
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Emerging Breast Imaging Technologies on the Horizon.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 1.875

3.  Objective measurements of image quality in synchrotron radiation phase-contrast imaging versus digital mammography.

Authors:  Y Ruiz-Gonzalez; M Perez-Diaz; D Martínez-Aguila; M Diaz-Barreto; I Fleitas; R Mora-Machado; L Rigon; G Tromba; P Bregant
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Medicine, material science and security: the versatility of the coded-aperture approach.

Authors:  P R T Munro; M Endrizzi; P C Diemoz; C K Hagen; M B Szafraniec; T P Millard; C E Zapata; R D Speller; A Olivo
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Dose and diagnostic performance comparison between phase-contrast mammography with synchrotron radiation and digital mammography: a clinical study report.

Authors:  Christian Fedon; Luigi Rigon; Fulvia Arfelli; Diego Dreossi; Elisa Quai; Maura Tonutti; Giuliana Tromba; Maria Assunta Cova; Renata Longo
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-02-01

6.  Large-angle x-ray scatter in Talbot-Lau interferometry for breast imaging.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Linxi Shi; Andrew Karellas
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Diagnosis of breast cancer based on microcalcifications using grating-based phase contrast CT.

Authors:  Xinbin Li; Hewei Gao; Zhiqiang Chen; Li Zhang; Xiaohua Zhu; Shengping Wang; Weijun Peng
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Development and preclinical evaluation of a patient-specific high energy x-ray phase sensitive breast tomosynthesis system.

Authors:  Muhammad U Ghani; Xizeng Wu; Laurie L Fajardo; Zhengxue Jing; Molly D Wong; Bin Zheng; Farid Omoumi; Yuhua Li; Aimin Yan; Peter Jenkins; Stephen L Hillis; Laura Linstroth; Hong Liu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  CT brush and CancerZap!: two video games for computed tomography dose minimization.

Authors:  Graham Alvare; Richard Gordon
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 2.432

Review 10.  Edge-illumination x-ray phase-contrast imaging.

Authors:  Alessandro Olivo
Journal:  J Phys Condens Matter       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 2.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.