Literature DB >> 25283514

Long-term outcomes of risk-reducing surgery in unaffected women at increased familial risk of breast and/or ovarian cancer.

Louise Heiniger1, Phyllis N Butow, Joseph Coll, Tracey Bullen, Judy Wilson, Brandi Baylock, Bettina Meiser, Melanie A Price.   

Abstract

This study prospectively investigated long-term psychosocial outcomes for women who opted for risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) and/or risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO). Unaffected women from high-risk breast cancer families who had completed baseline questionnaires for an existing study and subsequently underwent RRM and/or RRSO, completed measures of perceived breast and ovarian cancer risk, anxiety, depression, cancer-related anxiety, body image, sexual functioning, menopausal symptoms, use of hormone replacement therapy and decision regret 3 years post-surgery. Outcomes were compared to age- and risk-matched controls. Participants (N = 233) were 17 women who had RRM (39 controls), 38 women who had RRSO (94 controls) and 15 women who had RRM + RRSO (30 controls). Women who underwent RRM and those who underwent RRM + RRSO reported reductions in perceived breast cancer risk and perceived breast and ovarian cancer risk respectively, compared to their respective controls. RRM women reported greater reductions in cancer-related anxiety compared with both controls and RRSO women. RRSO women reported more sexual discomfort than controls and more urogenital menopausal symptoms than controls and RRM only women. No differences in general anxiety, depression or body image were observed. Regret was associated with greater reductions in body image since surgery and more sexual discomfort, although overall regret levels were low. Women who undergo RRM experience psychological benefits associated with reduced breast cancer risk. Although women who undergo RRSO experience some deterioration in sexual and menopausal symptoms, they do not regret their surgery decision. It is vital that women considering these procedures receive detailed information about potential psychosocial consequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25283514     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-014-9759-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  36 in total

1.  A qualitative study of the information needs of high-risk women undergoing prophylactic oophorectomy.

Authors:  N Hallowell
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  The psychosocial impact of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy: prospective study using questionnaires and semistructured interviews.

Authors:  M B Hatcher; L Fallowfield; R A'Hern
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-01-13

3.  A body image scale for use with cancer patients.

Authors:  P Hopwood; I Fletcher; A Lee; S Al Ghazal
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Anxiety/uncertainty reduction as a motivation for interest in prophylactic oophorectomy in women with a family history of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  K E Hurley; S M Miller; J W Costalas; D Gillespie; M B Daly
Journal:  J Womens Health Gend Based Med       Date:  2001-03

5.  Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium.

Authors:  D Ford; D F Easton; M Stratton; S Narod; D Goldgar; P Devilee; D T Bishop; B Weber; G Lenoir; J Chang-Claude; H Sobol; M D Teare; J Struewing; A Arason; S Scherneck; J Peto; T R Rebbeck; P Tonin; S Neuhausen; R Barkardottir; J Eyfjord; H Lynch; B A Ponder; S A Gayther; M Zelada-Hedman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Clinical follow-up after bilateral risk reducing ('prophylactic') mastectomy: mental health and body image outcomes.

Authors:  P Hopwood; A Lee; A Shenton; A Baildam; A Brain; F Lalloo; G Evans; A Howell
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  A prospective study of quality of life among women undergoing risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy versus gynecologic screening for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Carolyn Y Fang; Carol Cherry; Karthik Devarajan; Tianyu Li; John Malick; Mary B Daly
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Predictors of cancer worry in unaffected women from high risk breast cancer families: risk perception is not the primary issue.

Authors:  Melanie Anne Price; Phyllis Noami Butow; Sing Kai Lo; Judy Wilson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-09-09       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Validation of a decision regret scale.

Authors:  Jamie C Brehaut; Annette M O'Connor; Timothy J Wood; Thomas F Hack; Laura Siminoff; Elisa Gordon; Deb Feldman-Stewart
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  Psychological reactions, quality of life, and body image after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women at high risk for breast cancer: a prospective 1-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Yvonne Brandberg; Kerstin Sandelin; Staffan Erikson; Göran Jurell; Annelie Liljegren; Annika Lindblom; Ann Lindén; Anna von Wachenfeldt; Marie Wickman; Brita Arver
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  12 in total

1.  Heightened perception of breast cancer risk in young women at risk of familial breast cancer.

Authors:  Rachael Glassey; Moira O'Connor; Angela Ives; Christobel Saunders; Sarah O'Sullivan; Sarah J Hardcastle
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Perspectives of Women Considering Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy and their Peers towards a Telephone-Based Peer Support Intervention.

Authors:  D St-Pierre; K Bouchard; L Gauthier; J Chiquette; Michel Dorval
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Selected medical interventions in women with a deleterious BRCA mutation: a population-based study in British Columbia.

Authors:  G E Hanley; J N McAlpine; R Cheifetz; K A Schrader; M McCullum; D Huntsman
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Comparison between patient-reported outcomes after enucleation and proton beam radiotherapy for uveal melanomas: a 2-year cohort study.

Authors:  Laura Hope-Stone; Stephen L Brown; Heinrich Heimann; Bertil Damato
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Understanding Preoperative Breast Satisfaction among Patients Undergoing Mastectomy and Immediate Reconstruction: BREAST-Q Insights.

Authors:  Meghana G Shamsunder; Thais O Polanco; Colleen M McCarthy; Robert J Allen; Evan Matros; Michelle Coriddi; Babak J Mehrara; Andrea Pusic; Jonas A Nelson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Prospective follow-up of quality of life for participants undergoing risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy or ovarian cancer screening in GOG-0199: An NRG Oncology/GOG study.

Authors:  Phuong L Mai; Helen Q Huang; Lari B Wenzel; Paul K Han; Richard P Moser; Gustavo C Rodriguez; John Boggess; Thomas J Rutherford; David E Cohn; Noah D Kauff; Kelly-Anne Phillips; Kelly Wilkinson; Robert M Wenham; Chad Hamilton; Matthew A Powell; Joan L Walker; Mark H Greene; Martee L Hensley
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 7.  Nipple-sparing mastectomy in women at high risk of developing breast cancer.

Authors:  Rebecca S Lewis; Angela George; Jennifer E Rusby
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-06

8.  Choosing high-risk screening vs. surgery and the effect of treatment modality on anxiety and breast-specific sensuality in BRCA mutation carriers.

Authors:  Kristin E Rojas; Elizabeth Butler; Julie Gutierrez; Rebecca Kwait; Jessica Laprise; Jennifer Scalia Wilbur; Sarah Spinette; Christina A Raker; Katina Robison; Robert Legare; Jennifer Gass; Ashley Stuckey
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-06

9.  Patient-Reported Satisfaction after Prophylactic Operations of the Breast.

Authors:  Katja Keller; Cornelia Meisel; Nannette Grübling; Andrea Petzold; Pauline Wimberger; Karin Kast
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 10.  Risk-reducing mastectomy for the prevention of primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Nora E Carbine; Liz Lostumbo; Judi Wallace; Henry Ko
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-04-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.