Literature DB >> 11180581

Clinical follow-up after bilateral risk reducing ('prophylactic') mastectomy: mental health and body image outcomes.

P Hopwood1, A Lee, A Shenton, A Baildam, A Brain, F Lalloo, G Evans, A Howell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In Manchester, approximately 120 women at > or = 1:4 lifetime risk of breast cancer have considered preventative surgery since 1992. Women treated within the Manchester protocol receive two genetic counselling sessions, a psychological assessment and a surgical consultation pre-operatively and annual follow-up post-operatively. The vast majority of women have breast reconstruction.
METHODS: Since 1996, mental health and body image have been assessed in women attending annual follow-up using self-report questionnaires: the 28-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) and 10-item Body Image Scale (BIS). Women with high scores are assessed by clinical interview together with a proportion who have no significant problems.
RESULTS: Between 1995 and 1999, 76 women completed surgery. Ten were awaiting post-operative review and 60 (91%) attended for follow-up of whom 45 (75%) were interviewed. Questionnaire data were available for 52 (79%) women, mean age 40.8 years (range 27-58). Six women were gene mutation carriers and of these three had had breast cancer. One additional patient was affected but had not been genetically tested. Eight (17%) of 47 women with assessments in the first post-operative year scored in the 'caseness' range on the GHQ: the mean GHQ score was 3.8 (S.D. 6.7), range 0-25. Results were comparable with those for women attending the Family History Clinic for risk assessment. The mean score on the BIS was 5.1 (S.D. 5.5), range 0-25, comparable with scores for women undergoing conservative surgery for breast cancer. Twenty-one percent of women reported no negative change in body image following surgery (i.e. zero questionnaire summary scores) and the majority of changes reported were of minor degree (item scores 0 or 1). The most frequently reported changes were in sexual attractiveness (55%), feeling less physically attractive (53%) and self-consciousness about appearance (53%): a third of women felt less feminine to a minimal degree. These results appeared stable over time. A minority of women had more serious psychological or body image concerns, usually in relation to surgical complications: they received further psychiatric intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: For the majority of women there is no evidence of significant mental health or body image problems in the first 3 years following Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy (BPM), but women who have complications warrant additional psychological help. Careful pre-operative preparation and long-term monitoring are advocated in this new field of cancer prevention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11180581     DOI: 10.1002/1099-1611(200011/12)9:6<462::aid-pon485>3.0.co;2-j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  27 in total

Review 1.  Genotype phenotype correlation in Li-Fraumeni syndrome kindreds and its implications for management.

Authors:  R N Moule; S G Jhavar; R A Eeles
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Acceptance of preventive surgeries by Israeli women who had undergone BRCA testing.

Authors:  Vardit Kram; Tamar Peretz; Michal Sagi
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Attitudes to reproductive genetic testing in women who had a positive BRCA test before having children: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Elizabeth Ormondroyd; Louise Donnelly; Clare Moynihan; Cornelie Savona; Elizabeth Bancroft; D Gareth Evans; Rosalind Eeles; Stuart Lavery; Maggie Watson
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Body image issues after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy with breast reconstruction in healthy women at risk for hereditary breast cancer.

Authors:  Jessica P Gopie; Marc A M Mureau; Caroline Seynaeve; Moniek M Ter Kuile; Marian B E Menke-Pluymers; Reinier Timman; Aad Tibben
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 5.  Risk assessment and management of high risk familial breast cancer.

Authors:  D G R Evans; F Lalloo
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.318

6.  Screening for body image dissatisfaction in patients with advanced cancer: a pilot study.

Authors:  Wadih Rhondali; Gary B Chisholm; Marilene Filbet; Duck-Hee Kang; David Hui; Michelle Cororve Fingeret; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 2.947

7.  Mood, body image, fear of kidney failure, life satisfaction, and decisional stability following living kidney donation: Findings from the KDOC study.

Authors:  J R Rodrigue; J D Schold; P Morrissey; J Whiting; J Vella; L K Kayler; D Katz; J Jones; B Kaplan; A Fleishman; M Pavlakis; D A Mandelbrot
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  Perspectives of Women Considering Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy and their Peers towards a Telephone-Based Peer Support Intervention.

Authors:  D St-Pierre; K Bouchard; L Gauthier; J Chiquette; Michel Dorval
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Preoperative psychosocial characteristics may predict body image and sexuality two years after risk-reducing mastectomy: a prospective study.

Authors:  Dmytro Unukovych; Hemming Johansson; Yvonne Brandberg
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-02

10.  The psychosocial concerns and needs of women recently diagnosed with breast cancer: a qualitative study of patient, nurse and volunteer perspectives.

Authors:  Lisa Beatty; Melissa Oxlad; Bogda Koczwara; Tracey D Wade
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.