Literature DB >> 31328104

Choosing high-risk screening vs. surgery and the effect of treatment modality on anxiety and breast-specific sensuality in BRCA mutation carriers.

Kristin E Rojas1, Elizabeth Butler2, Julie Gutierrez3, Rebecca Kwait4, Jessica Laprise5, Jennifer Scalia Wilbur5, Sarah Spinette6, Christina A Raker5, Katina Robison5, Robert Legare5, Jennifer Gass5, Ashley Stuckey5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We have previously shown that breast cancer surgery affects breast specific sensuality, and that women who undergo mastectomy may have worse sexual function outcomes than those who undergo lumpectomy. It is less clear if patients who undergo prophylactic mastectomy are equally as affected as those with a cancer diagnosis. We sought to compare sexual function outcomes and their relationship to depression and anxiety between BRCA mutation carriers (mBRCA) with and without cancer in order to guide surgical counseling and improve survivorship outcomes.
METHODS: A confidential, cross-sectional survey was distributed electronically to mBRCA at least 18 years of age. The survey included investigator-generated questions, the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) surveys. Responses were analyzed in total and divided into two subgroups: those with and without breast cancer.
RESULTS: Sixty-three mBRCA responded (37%) of 170 email addresses were identified, and 77% were postmenopausal. Although more than half of all mBRCA reported that the role of the breast in intimacy was important, most patients without cancer and all of those with cancer experienced an impressive decline in certain breast-specific sensuality parameters postoperatively. Among those without cancer, anxiety scores were not different between those choosing prophylactic mastectomy and high-risk screening (HRS). Sexual function as measured by the FSFI was negatively correlated with depression and anxiety in mBRCA. FSFI scores were not significantly different between those with and without cancer. However, the median FSFI of mBRCA with cancer, those undergoing HRS, and those who underwent prophylactic mastectomy indicated sexual dysfunction.
CONCLUSIONS: As the availability of genetic testing increases, more women are found to harbor BRCA mutations and must choose between HRS and prophylactic surgery. Women with BRCA mutations, both with and without breast cancer, are susceptible to derangements in sexual function during the course of both screening or treatment, and this appears to be negatively correlated to depression and anxiety.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRCA; breast cancer surgery; breast-specific sensuality; depression, anxiety; high-risk screening (HRS); lumpectomy; mastectomy; sexual function

Year:  2019        PMID: 31328104      PMCID: PMC6606478          DOI: 10.21037/gs.2019.04.08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gland Surg        ISSN: 2227-684X


  31 in total

1.  The psychosocial impact of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy: prospective study using questionnaires and semistructured interviews.

Authors:  M B Hatcher; L Fallowfield; R A'Hern
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-01-13

2.  Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case Series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies.

Authors:  A Antoniou; P D P Pharoah; S Narod; H A Risch; J E Eyfjord; J L Hopper; N Loman; H Olsson; O Johannsson; A Borg; B Pasini; P Radice; S Manoukian; D M Eccles; N Tang; E Olah; H Anton-Culver; E Warner; J Lubinski; J Gronwald; B Gorski; H Tulinius; S Thorlacius; H Eerola; H Nevanlinna; K Syrjäkoski; O-P Kallioniemi; D Thompson; C Evans; J Peto; F Lalloo; D G Evans; D F Easton
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-04-03       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Long-term satisfaction and psychological and social function following bilateral prophylactic mastectomy.

Authors:  M H Frost; D J Schaid; T A Sellers; J M Slezak; P G Arnold; J E Woods; P M Petty; J L Johnson; D L Sitta; S K McDonnell; T A Rummans; R B Jenkins; J A Sloan; L C Hartmann
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-07-19       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review.

Authors:  Ingvar Bjelland; Alv A Dahl; Tone Tangen Haug; Dag Neckelmann
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.006

5.  Cancer risk estimates for BRCA1 mutation carriers identified in a risk evaluation program.

Authors:  Marcia S Brose; Timothy R Rebbeck; Kathleen A Calzone; Jill E Stopfer; Katherine L Nathanson; Barbara L Weber
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-09-18       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Long-term psychological impact of carrying a BRCA1/2 mutation and prophylactic surgery: a 5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Iris van Oostrom; Hanne Meijers-Heijboer; Litanja N Lodder; Hugo J Duivenvoorden; Arthur R van Gool; Caroline Seynaeve; Conny A van der Meer; Jan G M Klijn; Bert N van Geel; Curt W Burger; Juriy W Wladimiroff; Aad Tibben
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors.

Authors:  Jonathan Tyrer; Stephen W Duffy; Jack Cuzick
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  The value of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) for comparing women with early onset breast cancer with population-based reference women.

Authors:  R H Osborne; G R Elsworth; M A G Sprangers; F J Oort; J L Hopper
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  How many more breast cancer predisposition genes are there?

Authors:  D F Easton
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  1999-08-23       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Psychosocial impact of breast/ovarian (BRCA1/2) cancer-predictive genetic testing in a UK multi-centre clinical cohort.

Authors:  M Watson; C Foster; R Eeles; D Eccles; S Ashley; R Davidson; J Mackay; P J Morrison; P Hopwood; D G R Evans
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  2 in total

1.  Prevalent versus incident breast cancers: benefits of clinical and radiological monitoring in women with pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants.

Authors:  Claire Saule; Solveig Menu-Hespel; Matthieu Carton; Caroline Malhaire; Pascal Cherel; Fabien Reyal; Marine Le Mentec; Eugénie Guillot; Anne Donnadieu; Nasrine Callet; Sophie Frank; Florence Coussy; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Emmanuelle Mouret-Fourme
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 5.351

2.  Perceptions and care Recommendations from Previvors: Qualitative analysis of female BRCA1/2 mutation Carriers' experience with genetic testing and counseling.

Authors:  Kate E Dibble; Laura K M Donorfio; Preston A Britner; Keith M Bellizzi
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2022-05-02
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.