Literature DB >> 25279213

Upgrading and upstaging in prostate cancer: From prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy.

Carolina D'Elia1, Maria Angela Cerruto1, Antonio Cioffi1, Giovanni Novella1, Stefano Cavalleri1, Walter Artibani1.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer (CaP) is the most common malignancy in men and the second cause of cancer-related mortality after lung cancer. Several studies have evaluated the correlation between bioptic and pathological Gleason score (GS), documenting a correlation ranging between 30 and 60%. The aim of this study was the evaluation of the association between bioptic and pathological GS in a series of patients undergoing prostate needle biopsy and subsequent radical prostatectomy. We also aimed to evaluate the possible prognostic factors of upgrading and upstaging. We prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed data from 300 consecutive patients who underwent radical retropubic or robot-assisted prostatectomy at our Institution. Patients who underwent prostate needle biopsy, transrectal or transperineal, with a minimum of 5 samples, were included in this study. Upgrading and downgrading were defined as increase or decrease, respectively, from one prognostic grade group to another, similar to up- or downstaging. The mean age of the patients was 62.97 years and the mean prostate-spesific antigen (PSA) level was 7.83 ng/ml. A total of 51.3% of the population underwent a transperineal prostate biopsy. The most frequently represented bioptic GS was 3+3 (64.0%) followed by 3+4=7 (15.6%); the most frequent pathological Gleason score was 3+4 (44.3%), followed by 3+3 (31.0%). With reagard to the bioptic GS 4-5-6 group, approximately half of the specimens (46.7%) were subsequently upgraded to GS 3+4, and 5.3% to 4+3. With regards to the bioptic GS 3+4 group, 57.4% was confirmed in the surgical specimen. In the 4+3 group, 23.5% of the cases was downgraded to 3+4 and 35.3% was confirmed. With regards to stage, ~39.7% of the patients received an upstaging on the pathological specimen. We evaluated the correlations between preoperative serum PSA level, prostate volume, digital rectal examination and biopsy type and none of the variables considered exhibited a correlation with any upgrading (P>0.05). Moreover, we evaluated the correlations between the aforementioned variables and upstaging and, at the multivariate analysis, only a serum PSA <4 ng/ml was found to be an independent variable predictive of upstaging (P=0.017). Therefore, new tools are required to predict upgrading and upstaging of our patients, in order to ensure better counseling for optimal treatment planning.

Entities:  

Keywords:  prostate biopsy; prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy; upgrading; upstaging

Year:  2014        PMID: 25279213      PMCID: PMC4179778          DOI: 10.3892/mco.2014.370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol        ISSN: 2049-9450


  23 in total

1.  Errors in histological grading by prostatic needle biopsy specimens: frequency and predisposing factors.

Authors:  E Ruijter; G van Leenders; G Miller; F Debruyne; C van de Kaa
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 7.996

2.  A prospective randomized comparison of diagnostic efficacy between transperineal and transrectal 12-core prostate biopsy.

Authors:  A Takenaka; R Hara; T Ishimura; T Fujii; Y Jo; A Nagai; M Fujisawa
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 3.  Anaesthesia in transrectal prostate biopsy: which is the most effective technique?

Authors:  Carmen Maccagnano; Vincenzo Scattoni; Marco Roscigno; Marco Raber; Diego Angiolilli; Francesco Montorsi; Patrizio Rigatti
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease.

Authors:  Axel Heidenreich; Joaquim Bellmunt; Michel Bolla; Steven Joniau; Malcolm Mason; Vsevolod Matveev; Nicolas Mottet; Hans-Peter Schmid; Theo van der Kwast; Thomas Wiegel; Filliberto Zattoni
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention.

Authors:  P C Walsh; P J Donker
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Upgrading of Gleason score 6 prostate cancers on biopsy after prostatectomy in the low and intermediate tPSA range.

Authors:  D Colleselli; A E Pelzer; E Steiner; S Ongarello; G Schaefer; G Bartsch; C Schwentner
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 5.554

7.  A prospective, non-randomized trial comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy in one European institution.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Giacomo Novara; Simonetta Fracalanza; Carolina D'Elia; Silvia Secco; Massimo Iafrate; Stefano Cavalleri; Walter Artibani
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Biopsy core number represents one of foremost predictors of clinically significant gleason sum upgrading in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Umberto Capitanio; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Luc Valiquette; Paul Perrotte; Claudio Jeldres; Alberto Briganti; Andrea Gallina; Nazareno Suardi; Andrea Cestari; Giorgio Guazzoni; Andrea Salonia; Francesco Montorsi
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level < or =4.0 ng per milliliter.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Donna K Pauler; Phyllis J Goodman; Catherine M Tangen; M Scott Lucia; Howard L Parnes; Lori M Minasian; Leslie G Ford; Scott M Lippman; E David Crawford; John J Crowley; Charles A Coltman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate.

Authors:  K K Hodge; J E McNeal; M K Terris; T A Stamey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  10 in total

1.  Population-based study of grade progression in patients who harboured Gleason 3 + 3.

Authors:  Fanny Sampurno; Arul Earnest; Jeremy Millar; Mark Frydenberg; Declan Murphy; Warwick Delprado; Sue Evans
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Preoperative low serum testosterone is associated with high-grade prostate cancer and an increased Gleason score upgrading.

Authors:  A Pichon; Y Neuzillet; H Botto; J-P Raynaud; C Radulescu; V Molinié; J-M Herve; T Lebret
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 5.554

3.  Investigating the role of DCE-MRI, over T2 and DWI, in accurate PI-RADS v2 assessment of clinically significant peripheral zone prostate lesions as defined at radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Mehdi Taghipour; Alireza Ziaei; Francesco Alessandrino; Elmira Hassanzadeh; Mukesh Harisinghani; Mark Vangel; Clare M Tempany; Fiona M Fennessy
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2019-04

Review 4.  Extracellular vesicles for liquid biopsy in prostate cancer: where are we and where are we headed?

Authors:  V R Minciacchi; A Zijlstra; M A Rubin; D Di Vizio
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 5.554

5.  SNHG3 could promote prostate cancer progression through reducing methionine dependence of PCa cells.

Authors:  Xiaotian Wang; Yongsheng Song; Yaxing Shi; Da Yang; Jiaxing Li; Bo Yin
Journal:  Cell Mol Biol Lett       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 5.787

6.  Differences in Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Lower Saxony (Germany) and Groningen Province (Netherlands): Potential Impact of Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing.

Authors:  Sanny Kappen; Geertruida H de Bock; Eunice Sirri; Claudia Vohmann; Joachim Kieschke; Alexander Winter
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Targeted Prostate Biopsy Gleason Score Heterogeneity and Implications for Risk Stratification.

Authors:  Shane Mesko; Leonard Marks; Omar Ragab; Shyamal Patel; Daniel A Margolis; D Jeffrey Demanes; Mitchell Kamrava
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.787

8.  Age-Adjusted PSA Levels in Prostate Cancer Prediction: Updated Results of the Tyrol Prostate Cancer Early Detection Program.

Authors:  Isabel Heidegger; Josef Fritz; Helmut Klocker; Renate Pichler; Jasmin Bektic; Wolfgang Horninger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Integrated analysis of the prostate cancer small-nucleolar transcriptome reveals SNORA55 as a driver of prostate cancer progression.

Authors:  Francesco Crea; Luca Quagliata; Agnieszka Michael; Hui Hsuan Liu; Paolo Frumento; Arun A Azad; Hui Xue; Larissa Pikor; Akira Watahiki; Rudolf Morant; Serenella Eppenberger-Castori; Yuwei Wang; Abhijit Parolia; Kim A Lennox; Wan L Lam; Martin Gleave; Kim N Chi; Hardev Pandha; Yuzhuo Wang; Cheryl D Helgason
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 6.603

10.  African-American men and prostate cancer-specific mortality: a competing risk analysis of a large institutional cohort, 1989-2015.

Authors:  Vonetta L Williams; Shivanshu Awasthi; Angelina K Fink; Julio M Pow-Sang; Jong Y Park; Travis Gerke; Kosj Yamoah
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 4.452

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.